Literature DB >> 32550833

Further Evidence Breastfeeding by Women With Epilepsy Is Safe: Are Mothers Getting the Message?

Katherine Noe.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32550833      PMCID: PMC7281906          DOI: 10.1177/1535759720917997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsy Curr        ISSN: 1535-7511            Impact factor:   7.500


× No keyword cloud information.

Commentary

The benefits of breastfeeding are well established. Breastfed infants are at lower risk of respiratory infections, otitis media, gastroenteritis, and sudden infant death syndrome.[1] Children who were breastfed have lower rates of obesity, type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus, and acute leukemia.[1] They also may have higher intelligence quotient (IQ) scores than formula-fed infants.[1] For mothers, breastfeeding benefits include lower rates of postpartum depression and type 2 diabetes mellitus and long-term risk reduction of cardiovascular disease, hypertension, breast, and ovarian cancer.[1] Economic considerations also favor breastfeeding over infant formula. Given these advantages, breastfeeding should be recommended unless there are clear and compelling contraindications. The American Academy of Pediatrics specifically recommends exclusive breastfeeding for the first 6 months.[1] In reality, 75% of women in the United States initiate breastfeeding, but at 6 months postpartum, only 43% are still doing any breastfeeding and only 13% exclusively breastfeeding.[1] Maternal education, socioeconomic status, and race influence the likelihood of breastfeeding, as do cultural and social mores.[2] Women with epilepsy face unique barriers and are even less likely to breastfeed.[3-5] Their major concern is presumed to be that antiepileptic drug (AED) in breast milk could be harmful to their child. The 2009 American Academy of Neurology guideline on pregnancy management in women with epilepsy noted that the paucity of evidence around breastfeeding served as a source of anxiety for both women and health-care providers.[6] One area of caution has been the potential for AED in breast milk to cause immediate dose-related adverse effects, such as sedation, irritability, liver dysfunction, or rash. Reports of such adverse events in exposed infants have been infrequent.[7] Nevertheless, for those trying to calculate the likelihood of toxic exposure, the pharmacokinetic considerations are complex and published studies of concentration of AED in breast milk and/or infant serum have been limited in number and scope.[7] A second potential concern is that extended exposure to AED via breastfeeding could adversely affect the developing brain, resulting in behavioral or intellectual impairment. However, previously published prospective data from the Neurodevelopmental Effects of Antiepileptic Drugs (NEAD) study of offspring of women with epilepsy taking monotherapy lamotrigine, carbamazepine, valproate, or phenytoin during pregnancy showed higher average IQ at 6 years of age those that were breastfed.[8] Similarly, a large prospective cohort study from Norway found that babies exposed to AED during pregnancy who were continuously breastfed had better developmental outcomes at 18 months compared to those with limited or no breastfeeding.[4] The authors of these studies concluded that women with epilepsy could be encouraged to breast feed, but it is not clear that rates of breastfeeding have improved over time. Newly published data on AED levels in breastfeeding infants from the NEAD study should further increase support of breastfeeding by women with epilepsy. Birnbaum et al measured temporally matched maternal and breastfed infant serum AED levels in 164 pairs 5 to 20 weeks postpartum.[9] A total of 82% of the women were on a monotherapy AED regimen. The most common AEDs were lamotrigine (n = 73) and levetiracetam (n = 63) and small numbers of mothers taking carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, topiramate, valproate, and zonisamide. In 49% of the infants, the AED concentration was below the lower limit of detection. In single drug analysis, 71% of infants exposed to levetiracetam had undetectable serum levels, while 88.6% of infants exposed to lamotrigine had measurable levels. The median infant to mother AED concentration was 29% for lamotrigine, 44% for levetiracetam, 21% for valproate, and less than 20% for all of the other AED. A regression analysis of a subset of the pairs taking levetiracetam and lamotrigine found infant drug concentration was predicted by maternal serum concentration, but not by time between maternal drug dosing and feeding or by overall duration of breastfeeding. The authors noted that the levels of AED exposure to breastfed infants is very low compared to that which occurs during pregnancy and therefore would be unlikely to result in additional adverse neurodevelopmental impact. As clinicians, we need to determine how to convert the growing body of evidence on the safety of breastfeeding for women taking AED into expanding the numbers who successfully breastfeed for the recommend 6 months or longer. Blanket recommendations to avoid breastfeeding out of an abundance of caution are no longer acceptable in the face of available data. Many other barriers still remain. First, many physicians lack the knowledge and training necessary to advise women on the benefits of breast feeding.[1] If this is true for family practitioners and pediatricians, then certainly most neurologists have an educational gap in this area. Providers can access free, up to date information about medications and breastfeeding through the National Library of Medicine LactMed database (http://lactmed.nlm.nih.gov). Second, there is abundant evidence that health-care providers are generally poor at accurately communicating with patients about medical risks and that this communication failure contributes to poor health-care decision-making.[10] One area for improvement is how we as health-care providers frame the conversation around risk.[10] Are you advising your patient that she could breastfeed, only to then excessively caution about the need to monitor for infant sedation or infant AED levels? A balanced discussion should include both the potential benefits as well as potential harms and avoid an unintended focus on atypically severe or uncommon outcomes. Finally, we should explore other barriers to breastfeeding in women with epilepsy outside of AED exposure. For example, women with epilepsy may fear that breastfeeding will increase sleep deprivation and potentially increase the risk of breakthrough seizures. In fact, parents who breastfed in the first 3 months of life have been shown to get both more sleep and less disrupted sleep compared to those feeding formula to their infants at night.[11] The best time to have these conversations with your own patients is prior to conception or prior to delivery, before the opportunity to start breastfeeding has been lost or breastfeeding interrupted. The good news: When health-care providers support breastfeeding and empower their patients with appropriate education, rates of breastfeeding improve.[2]
  10 in total

1.  Misleading communication of risk.

Authors:  Gerd Gigerenzer; Odette Wegwarth; Markus Feufel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-10-12

Review 2.  Epilepsy and recommendations for breastfeeding.

Authors:  Gyri Veiby; Marte Bjørk; Bernt A Engelsen; Nils Erik Gilhus
Journal:  Seizure       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 3.184

3.  Unintended pregnancy, prenatal care, newborn outcomes, and breastfeeding in women with epilepsy.

Authors:  Emily L Johnson; Anne E Burke; Anqi Wang; Page B Pennell
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Breastfeeding and the use of human milk.

Authors:  Lawrence M Gartner; Jane Morton; Ruth A Lawrence; Audrey J Naylor; Donna O'Hare; Richard J Schanler; Arthur I Eidelman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Effects of breastfeeding in children of women taking antiepileptic drugs.

Authors:  K J Meador; G A Baker; N Browning; J Clayton-Smith; D T Combs-Cantrell; M Cohen; L A Kalayjian; A Kanner; J D Liporace; P B Pennell; M Privitera; D W Loring
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Breastfeeding in children of women taking antiepileptic drugs: cognitive outcomes at age 6 years.

Authors:  Kimford J Meador; Gus A Baker; Nancy Browning; Morris J Cohen; Rebecca L Bromley; Jill Clayton-Smith; Laura A Kalayjian; Andres Kanner; Joyce D Liporace; Page B Pennell; Michael Privitera; David W Loring
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 16.193

7.  Breast-feeding increases sleep duration of new parents.

Authors:  Therese Doan; Annelise Gardiner; Caryl L Gay; Kathryn A Lee
Journal:  J Perinat Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2007 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.638

8.  Early child development and exposure to antiepileptic drugs prenatally and through breastfeeding: a prospective cohort study on children of women with epilepsy.

Authors:  Gyri Veiby; Bernt A Engelsen; Nils Erik Gilhus
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 18.302

Review 9.  Management issues for women with epilepsy--focus on pregnancy (an evidence-based review): III. Vitamin K, folic acid, blood levels, and breast-feeding: Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee and Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society.

Authors:  Cynthia L Harden; Page B Pennell; Barbara S Koppel; Collin A Hovinga; Barry Gidal; Kimford J Meador; Jennifer Hopp; Tricia Y Ting; W A Hauser; David Thurman; Peter W Kaplan; Julian N Robinson; Jacqueline A French; Samuel Wiebe; Andrew N Wilner; Blanca Vazquez; Lewis Holmes; Allan Krumholz; Richard Finnell; Patricia O Shafer; Claire L Le Guen
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.864

Review 10.  Breastfeeding: What are the Barriers? Why Women Struggle to Achieve Their Goals.

Authors:  Natasha K Sriraman; Ann Kellams
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 2.681

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.