The benefits of breastfeeding are well established. Breastfed infants are at lower risk of
respiratory infections, otitis media, gastroenteritis, and sudden infant death syndrome.[1] Children who were breastfed have lower rates of obesity, type 1 and type 2 diabetes
mellitus, and acute leukemia.[1] They also may have higher intelligence quotient (IQ) scores than formula-fed infants.[1] For mothers, breastfeeding benefits include lower rates of postpartum depression and
type 2 diabetes mellitus and long-term risk reduction of cardiovascular disease,
hypertension, breast, and ovarian cancer.[1] Economic considerations also favor breastfeeding over infant formula. Given these
advantages, breastfeeding should be recommended unless there are clear and compelling
contraindications. The American Academy of Pediatrics specifically recommends exclusive
breastfeeding for the first 6 months.[1] In reality, 75% of women in the United States initiate breastfeeding, but at 6 months
postpartum, only 43% are still doing any breastfeeding and only 13% exclusively breastfeeding.[1] Maternal education, socioeconomic status, and race influence the likelihood of
breastfeeding, as do cultural and social mores.[2] Women with epilepsy face unique barriers and are even less likely to breastfeed.[3-5] Their major concern is presumed to be that antiepileptic drug (AED) in breast milk
could be harmful to their child. The 2009 American Academy of Neurology guideline on
pregnancy management in women with epilepsy noted that the paucity of evidence around
breastfeeding served as a source of anxiety for both women and health-care providers.[6] One area of caution has been the potential for AED in breast milk to cause immediate
dose-related adverse effects, such as sedation, irritability, liver dysfunction, or rash.
Reports of such adverse events in exposed infants have been infrequent.[7] Nevertheless, for those trying to calculate the likelihood of toxic exposure, the
pharmacokinetic considerations are complex and published studies of concentration of AED in
breast milk and/or infant serum have been limited in number and scope.[7] A second potential concern is that extended exposure to AED via breastfeeding could
adversely affect the developing brain, resulting in behavioral or intellectual impairment.
However, previously published prospective data from the Neurodevelopmental Effects of
Antiepileptic Drugs (NEAD) study of offspring of women with epilepsy taking monotherapy
lamotrigine, carbamazepine, valproate, or phenytoin during pregnancy showed higher average
IQ at 6 years of age those that were breastfed.[8] Similarly, a large prospective cohort study from Norway found that babies exposed to
AED during pregnancy who were continuously breastfed had better developmental outcomes at 18
months compared to those with limited or no breastfeeding.[4] The authors of these studies concluded that women with epilepsy could be encouraged
to breast feed, but it is not clear that rates of breastfeeding have improved over time.Newly published data on AED levels in breastfeeding infants from the NEAD study should
further increase support of breastfeeding by women with epilepsy. Birnbaum et al measured
temporally matched maternal and breastfed infant serum AED levels in 164 pairs 5 to 20 weeks postpartum.[9] A total of 82% of the women were on a monotherapy AED regimen. The most common AEDs
were lamotrigine (n = 73) and levetiracetam (n = 63) and small numbers of mothers taking
carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, topiramate, valproate, and zonisamide. In 49% of the infants,
the AED concentration was below the lower limit of detection. In single drug analysis, 71%
of infants exposed to levetiracetam had undetectable serum levels, while 88.6% of infants
exposed to lamotrigine had measurable levels. The median infant to mother AED concentration
was 29% for lamotrigine, 44% for levetiracetam, 21% for valproate, and less than 20% for all
of the other AED. A regression analysis of a subset of the pairs taking levetiracetam and
lamotrigine found infant drug concentration was predicted by maternal serum concentration,
but not by time between maternal drug dosing and feeding or by overall duration of
breastfeeding. The authors noted that the levels of AED exposure to breastfed infants is
very low compared to that which occurs during pregnancy and therefore would be unlikely to
result in additional adverse neurodevelopmental impact.As clinicians, we need to determine how to convert the growing body of evidence on the
safety of breastfeeding for women taking AED into expanding the numbers who successfully
breastfeed for the recommend 6 months or longer. Blanket recommendations to avoid
breastfeeding out of an abundance of caution are no longer acceptable in the face of
available data. Many other barriers still remain. First, many physicians lack the knowledge
and training necessary to advise women on the benefits of breast feeding.[1] If this is true for family practitioners and pediatricians, then certainly most
neurologists have an educational gap in this area. Providers can access free, up to date
information about medications and breastfeeding through the National Library of Medicine
LactMed database (http://lactmed.nlm.nih.gov). Second, there is abundant evidence that
health-care providers are generally poor at accurately communicating with patients about
medical risks and that this communication failure contributes to poor health-care decision-making.[10] One area for improvement is how we as health-care providers frame the conversation
around risk.[10] Are you advising your patient that she could breastfeed, only to then excessively
caution about the need to monitor for infant sedation or infant AED levels? A balanced
discussion should include both the potential benefits as well as potential harms and avoid
an unintended focus on atypically severe or uncommon outcomes. Finally, we should explore
other barriers to breastfeeding in women with epilepsy outside of AED exposure. For example,
women with epilepsy may fear that breastfeeding will increase sleep deprivation and
potentially increase the risk of breakthrough seizures. In fact, parents who breastfed in
the first 3 months of life have been shown to get both more sleep and less disrupted sleep
compared to those feeding formula to their infants at night.[11] The best time to have these conversations with your own patients is prior to
conception or prior to delivery, before the opportunity to start breastfeeding has been lost
or breastfeeding interrupted. The good news: When health-care providers support
breastfeeding and empower their patients with appropriate education, rates of breastfeeding improve.[2]
Authors: Lawrence M Gartner; Jane Morton; Ruth A Lawrence; Audrey J Naylor; Donna O'Hare; Richard J Schanler; Arthur I Eidelman Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: K J Meador; G A Baker; N Browning; J Clayton-Smith; D T Combs-Cantrell; M Cohen; L A Kalayjian; A Kanner; J D Liporace; P B Pennell; M Privitera; D W Loring Journal: Neurology Date: 2010-11-24 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Kimford J Meador; Gus A Baker; Nancy Browning; Morris J Cohen; Rebecca L Bromley; Jill Clayton-Smith; Laura A Kalayjian; Andres Kanner; Joyce D Liporace; Page B Pennell; Michael Privitera; David W Loring Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Cynthia L Harden; Page B Pennell; Barbara S Koppel; Collin A Hovinga; Barry Gidal; Kimford J Meador; Jennifer Hopp; Tricia Y Ting; W A Hauser; David Thurman; Peter W Kaplan; Julian N Robinson; Jacqueline A French; Samuel Wiebe; Andrew N Wilner; Blanca Vazquez; Lewis Holmes; Allan Krumholz; Richard Finnell; Patricia O Shafer; Claire L Le Guen Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 5.864