Literature DB >> 32550701

Endourology and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in COVID-19 Pandemic.

Alexis M Alva Pinto1, Mariano Sebastián González2.   

Abstract

The new disease COVID-19 pandemic has completely modified our lifestyle, changing our personal habits and daily activities and strongly our professional activity. Following World Health Organization (WHO) and health care authorities around the World recommendations, all elective surgeries from benign diagnose procedures must be postponed and imperatively continue working on emergent and oncological urgent pathologies. Surgical elective treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is not considered as a priority. During BPH endoscopic surgeries, urine and blood are mixed with the irrigation liquid implying a risk of viral presence. Furthermore, a steam and smoke bubble is being accumulated inside the bladder implying the risk of splashing and aerosols. The risks of other viral infections have been identified during endourological procedures and they are related to splashing events. Several studies observed 33-100% of splashing on goggles. All BPH endoscopic procedures must be postponed. In case of complete urinary obstruction, this event can be adequately treated by urethral or suprapubic catheter under local anesthesia. As soon as local COVID-19 prevalence decreases, endourological procedures could be restarted. As protocols are being validating around the World to redeem elective surgeries, a symptomatic obstructed patient could be operated knowing his COVID-19 status with a molecular PCR, a cleaned epidemiological interview with a normal preoperative protocol. If patient is COVID-19+, surgery must be delayed until complete recovery, because mortality could increase as Lei from Wuhan describes. Informed consent must include risks of complications related to COVID-19 disease. Surgery must be performed by an experienced surgeon in order to avoid increase of operating time and risks of complications. Surgical approach of BPH must be considered depending on availability of disposable material, infrastructure, and the epidemiological COVID-19 status of your area. The main aim is patients and healthcare staff safety. Copyright® by the International Brazilian Journal of Urology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19 [Supplementary Concept]; Pandemics; Prostatic Hyperplasia

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32550701      PMCID: PMC7719984          DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.S104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Braz J Urol        ISSN: 1677-5538            Impact factor:   1.541


INTRODUCTION

The coronavirus named SARS-CoV-2 is causing an outbreak of a new disease COVID-19. This pandemic has completely modified our lifestyle, changing our personal habits and daily activities and strongly our professional activity. At this point, current medical data and its clinical applications as suggested by conventional guidelines has had to be adapted to the feasibility of this new state of affairs. Nowadays, we face a new disease on Earth and there are not high level of evidence recommendations to deal with. Furthermore, during this pandemic, we have to follow expert recommendations modifying our urological indications and out-patient and in-patient schedules prioritizing emergent and urgent procedures in order to avoid a life-threatening situations or disease progression and/or maintain patient and sanitary staff safety with novels biosecurity protocols. Following World Health Organization (WHO) and health care authorities around the World recommendations, all elective surgeries from benign diagnose procedures must be postponed and imperatively continue working on emergent and oncological urgent pathologies. Unfortunately, in this context, surgical elective treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is not considered as a priority. However, this is a dynamic situation and information is evolving rapidly, so it is important to consider the status of your institution and locality to continue or recover your usual practice as proposed by the American College of Surgeons ( 1 ).

Risks during endourological procedures:

SARS-CoV-2 is a RNA virus belonging to the beta coronavirus family able to infect the upper respiratory tract. Spread mechanisms have been studied and identified from human-to-human respiratory interactions to airborne and fomites transmissions ( 2 – 8 ). In a hospital setting, knowing the extent of environmental contamination of SARS-CoV-2 in hospital wards (HW), operating room (OR) and intensive care units (ICU) is critical for improving safety practices for sanitary staff. Airborne and touching-fomites transmission have been observed in COVID dedicated ICUs and HWs ( 6 ). Some specific aerosol-producing procedures as endotracheal intubation, bronchoscopy, open suctioning, administration of nebulized treatment, manual ventilation before intubation, turning the patient to the prone position, disconnecting the patient from the ventilator, non-invasive positive-pressure ventilation, tracheostomy, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation, are considered high-risk situations ( 4 , 6 ). Furthermore, all aerosolization procedures are a security key point to be considered. Carcinogenetic hazard and risk of transmission of several bacteria and virus as corynebacterium , tuberculosis, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), human papillomavirus (HPV) and Hepatitis B have been described in different studies related to surgical smoke ( 9 – 13 ). At that point, many questions have been posed about bio-security in open, endoscopic and laparoscopic / robot assisted surgeries ( 13 – 15 ). Some risks during endourological procedures have been identified and they are related to splashing events and smoke/aerosolization producing procedures. SARS-CoV-2 RNA has been found also in blood, feces and urine implying a potential risk of transmission during endoscopic surgeries ( 16 – 21 ). All surgeons are aware of risks of viral transmission in blood splashing, however they are underestimated. Those who use routinely goggles notice these droplets over them. Several studies observed 33-100% of splashing on goggles ( 22 – 24 ) as shown in Table-1 . Moreover, not only on the chief surgeons but in assistants too, so eye protection is strongly suggested in each endourological procedure ( 24 ).
Table 1

Splashing blood events on eye protection.

AuthorProcedureWhat was examinedSplash event
Davies and Harrison ( 22 )Transuretral ResectionBlood on Spectacles100%
Muir and Davies ( 23 )Video ResectionBlood droplets on goggles66%
Wines et al. ( 24 )Video TURBlood droplets on goggles33%
Wines et al. ( 24 )Flexible URSBlood droplets on eyes shield58%
In relation to aerosolization and smoke produced, the hazard in endoscopic procedures are moderate compared with the biological and carcinogenetic risks observed in open and laparoscopic surgeries ( 13 ). Laparoscopic procedures are related with high concentrations of surgical smoke and 10 times aerosol potential exposure ( 15 ) but at the same time they are a natural physical barrier, this aerosolization hazard has the opportunity of being very well controlled. Current ablative BPH endoscopic technologies deliver thermal energy to cut, resect, vaporize and coagulate prostatic tissue. These well-known technologies use electrical (monopolar and bipolar) and laser (holmium, thulium, KTP, diode) sources of energy allowing a huge variety of procedures including transurethral resection, plasma bipolar and laser vaporization, and laser enucleation. During these surgeries, urine and blood are mixed with the irrigation liquid implying a risk of viral presence. Furthermore, a steam and smoke bubble are being accumulated inside the bladder implying the risk of splashing and aerosols even if no COVID-19 transmission has not been reported by this way.

COVID-19 and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)

Since hospitals will face a huge demand of resources to fight against a possible surge of COVID-19 cases, elective surgeries of benign pathology have been recommended to be delayed until the strain on the hospital system from COVID-19 decreases. Following this rules, all BPH procedures as TURP, HoLEP, ThuLEP, PVP, etc. must be postponed. In case of complete urinary obstruction, this event can be adequately treated by urethral or suprapubic catheter under local anesthesia ( 25 , 26 ). As soon as local COVID-19 prevalence decreases ( 26 ), endourological procedures could be restarted. As protocols are being validating around the World to redeem elective surgeries, a symptomatic obstructed patient could be operated knowing his COVID-19 status with a molecular PCR, a cleaned epidemiological interview with a normal preoperative protocol. If patient is COVID-19+, surgery must be delayed until complete recovery. Informed consent must include risks of complications related to COVID-19 disease. Ti et al. reported up to 20% mortality rate in asymptomatic COVID-19+ patients which were unintentionally programed for elective surgery ( 27 ). Including non COVID-19, all patients must be considered as suspected ones. At this point, surgical staff including scrub nurse and anesthesiologist must wear a level 2 or 3 PPE. Initially, only the anesthesiologist and the assistant must be inside the OR with the patient. Once the patient is anesthetized, surgical staff can enter into the OR. It is important to minimize the number of strictly needed people and to count with all required materials in order to avoid frequent door openings ( 28 ). Surgery must be performed by an experienced surgeon in order to avoid increase of operating time and risks of complications. During surgery, in order to minimize smoke or aerosol risks, surgeon must be attentive to exchanges of equipment, to systematically aspirate the gas bubble and the outflow drainage connected to the central aspiration system.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic procedures apparently are not as hazardous as open or laparoscopic approaches because aerosolization and smoke carcinogenetic risks and viral transmission are less frequent. Surgical approach of BPH must be considered depending on availability of disposable material, infrastructure, and the epidemiological COVID-19 status of your area. The main aim is patients and healthcare staff safety.
  24 in total

1.  Evaluation of fine particles in surgical smoke from an urologist's operating room by time and by distance.

Authors:  Hong-Kai Wang; Fei Mo; Chun-Guang Ma; Bo Dai; Guo-Hai Shi; Yao Zhu; Hai-Liang Zhang; Ding-Wei Ye
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  The hazards of surgical smoke.

Authors:  Brenda C Ulmer
Journal:  AORN J       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 0.676

Review 3.  Health risks associated with exposure to surgical smoke for surgeons and operation room personnel.

Authors:  Kae Okoshi; Katsutoshi Kobayashi; Koichi Kinoshita; Yasuko Tomizawa; Suguru Hasegawa; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 4.  Seasonality of Respiratory Viral Infections.

Authors:  Miyu Moriyama; Walter J Hugentobler; Akiko Iwasaki
Journal:  Annu Rev Virol       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 10.431

Review 5.  Awareness of surgical smoke hazards and enhancement of surgical smoke prevention among the gynecologists.

Authors:  Yi Liu; Yizuo Song; Xiaoli Hu; Linzhi Yan; Xueqiong Zhu
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2019-06-02       Impact factor: 4.207

6.  Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding.

Authors:  Roujian Lu; Xiang Zhao; Juan Li; Peihua Niu; Bo Yang; Honglong Wu; Wenling Wang; Hao Song; Baoying Huang; Na Zhu; Yuhai Bi; Xuejun Ma; Faxian Zhan; Liang Wang; Tao Hu; Hong Zhou; Zhenhong Hu; Weimin Zhou; Li Zhao; Jing Chen; Yao Meng; Ji Wang; Yang Lin; Jianying Yuan; Zhihao Xie; Jinmin Ma; William J Liu; Dayan Wang; Wenbo Xu; Edward C Holmes; George F Gao; Guizhen Wu; Weijun Chen; Weifeng Shi; Wenjie Tan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Organ distribution of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) in SARS patients: implications for pathogenesis and virus transmission pathways.

Authors:  Yanqing Ding; Li He; Qingling Zhang; Zhongxi Huang; Xiaoyan Che; Jinlin Hou; Huijun Wang; Hong Shen; Liwen Qiu; Zhuguo Li; Jian Geng; Junjie Cai; Huixia Han; Xin Li; Wei Kang; Desheng Weng; Ping Liang; Shibo Jiang
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.996

8.  Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1.

Authors:  Neeltje van Doremalen; Trenton Bushmaker; Dylan H Morris; Myndi G Holbrook; Amandine Gamble; Brandi N Williamson; Azaibi Tamin; Jennifer L Harcourt; Natalie J Thornburg; Susan I Gerber; James O Lloyd-Smith; Emmie de Wit; Vincent J Munster
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing surgeries during the incubation period of COVID-19 infection.

Authors:  Shaoqing Lei; Fang Jiang; Wating Su; Chang Chen; Jingli Chen; Wei Mei; Li-Ying Zhan; Yifan Jia; Liangqing Zhang; Danyong Liu; Zhong-Yuan Xia; Zhengyuan Xia
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2020-04-05

Review 10.  Airborne or Droplet Precautions for Health Workers Treating Coronavirus Disease 2019?

Authors:  Prateek Bahl; Con Doolan; Charitha de Silva; Abrar Ahmad Chughtai; Lydia Bourouiba; C Raina MacIntyre
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 7.759

View more
  3 in total

1.  COVID-19: The impact on urolithiasis treatment in Brazil.

Authors:  Fernando Korkes; Khalil Smaidi; Matheus Pascotto Salles; Antonio Correa Lopes; Ita Pfeferman Heilberg; Sidney Glina
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 2.  Impact of coronavirus disease on the management of lower urinary tract symptoms and voiding dysfunction.

Authors:  Osman Can; Alper Otunctemur
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.309

3.  Perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing urological elective surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national overview across 28 Italian institutions.

Authors:  Andrea Minervini; Fabrizio Di Maida; Andrea Mari; Angelo Porreca; Bernardo Rocco; Antonio Celia; Pierluigi Bove; Paolo Umari; Alessandro Volpe; Antonio Galfano; Antonio Luigi Pastore; Filippo Annino; Paolo Parma; Francesco Greco; Roberto Nucciotti; Riccardo Schiavina; Fabio Esposito; Daniele Romagnoli; Costantino Leonardo; Roberto Falabella; Fabrizio Gallo; Michele Amenta; Carmine Sciorio; Paolo Verze; Alessandro Tafuri; Luigi Pucci; Virginia Varca; Stefano Zaramella; Vincenzo Pagliarulo; Giorgio Bozzini; Carlo Ceruti; Mario Falsaperla; Angelo Cafarelli; Alessandro Antonelli
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2021-04-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.