Literature DB >> 32550401

Genome editing of Caenorhabditis briggsae using CRISPR/Cas9 co-conversion marker dpy-10.

Sarah Cohen1, Paul Sternberg1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 32550401      PMCID: PMC7252229          DOI: 10.17912/micropub.biology.000171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MicroPubl Biol        ISSN: 2578-9430


× No keyword cloud information.
(A) Wildtype AF16 worms as compared with (B) Cbr-dpy-10, which shows the Dumpy phenotype.

Description

Genomic editing of the roundworm Caenorhabditis elegans using the CRISPR/Cas9 system has allowed for widespread creation of null mutants – vital for scientific understanding of this model organism. A closely-related nematode species, Caenorhabditis briggsae, is emerging as an alternative model organism to better understand how findings in C. elegans can broaden and develop the larger field of nematology (Gupta et al. 2007). To that end, we have developed an effective and efficient co-conversion CRISPR/Cas9 system for use in C. briggsae using the gene dpy-10. We modified the universal STOP-IN cassette method, as described by Wang et al. (2018), for use in C. briggsae (Wang et al. 2018). Using the wildtype AF16 strain, we tested the method by choosing the gene Cbr-dpy-10 because of its readily observed predicted phenotype. Cbr-dpy-10 is a predicted one-to-one ortholog of C. elegans dpy-10, which encodes a protein important for cuticle development and has a phenotype characterized by short, fat animals relative to wild type (Brenner 1974). A universal STOP-IN allele of Cbr-dpy-10, sy1387, was generated and confirmed by genotype sequencing. The expected phenotype was subsequently observed, consistent with the creation of a null allele (Figure 1). Surprisingly, sy1387 is dominant. Injections of 20 animals produced 15 successful injections; 247 animals from these 15 injections (F1) were singled out and allowed to self-fertilize to produce F2. 81% of the F1 Dumpy progeny were homozygous as evidenced by their segregation of only Dumpy progeny – one of these candidates became sy1387. 2% of the F1s did not produce progeny. 17% of the 247 F1 Dumpy progeny were heterozygotes and had a mixture of Dumpy and non-Dumpy progeny; these non-Dumpy F2s only produced non-Dumpy progeny. This discovery of a dominant mutation will allow for more effective use of this as a co-conversion marker when screening for other mutations. We used Cbr-dpy-10 as a potential co-CRISPR marker for a second target that will be described elsewhere. We used PCR to detect insertion of a STOP-IN cassette at this other locus; we screened 39 Dumpy strains to obtain 11 candidates for our target gene, from which we have three STOP-IN alleles.
Figure 1

(A) Wildtype AF16 worms as compared with (B) Cbr-dpy-10, which shows the Dumpy phenotype.

Methods

We used the universal STOP-IN cassette method essentially as described in Wang et al. (2018). Potential guide sequences were followed by a 5’-NGG-3’ PAM site and were close to the start codon ATG of the target gene. The guide sequence for Cbr-dpy-10 used in this protocol was ATTCGCGTCAGATGATGTAC, located at the beginning of the gene’s second exon. To detect the stop-in insertion into Cbr-dpy-10, we used forward primer GAAAAACAACGGCAGAGACG and reverse primer TCCGCTTCCATAAGCACCAC. In sy1387, the second exon of Cbr-dpy-10 (shown below) was changed with the 41 basepair insert highlighted in red. This caused the early introduction of a stop codon (underlined) and a subsequent frameshift.

Reagents

All CRISPR/Cas9 system reagents were ordered from IDT except for the Cas9 protein, which was kindly provided by Tsui-Fen Chou. Sequences were downloaded from WormBase. Strain Generated: PS8520 Cbr-dpy-10 (sy1387) II
  3 in total

1.  The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  S Brenner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Genomics and biology of the nematode Caenorhabditis briggsae.

Authors:  Bhagwati P Gupta; Robert Johnsen; Nansheng Chen
Journal:  WormBook       Date:  2007-05-03

3.  An Efficient Genome Editing Strategy To Generate Putative Null Mutants in Caenorhabditis elegans Using CRISPR/Cas9.

Authors:  Han Wang; Heenam Park; Jonathan Liu; Paul W Sternberg
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 3.154

  3 in total
  3 in total

1.  The Cbr-DPY-10(Arg92Cys) modification is a reliable co-conversion marker for CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in Caenorhabditis briggsae.

Authors:  Itai Antoine Toker; Oliver Hobert
Journal:  MicroPubl Biol       Date:  2022-04-20

2.  Modular metabolite assembly in Caenorhabditis elegans depends on carboxylesterases and formation of lysosome-related organelles.

Authors:  Henry H Le; Chester Jj Wrobel; Sarah M Cohen; Jingfang Yu; Heenam Park; Maximilian J Helf; Brian J Curtis; Joseph C Kruempel; Pedro Reis Rodrigues; Patrick J Hu; Paul W Sternberg; Frank C Schroeder
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Formation and function of dauer ascarosides in the nematodes Caenorhabditis briggsae and Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Sarah M Cohen; Chester J J Wrobel; Sharan J Prakash; Frank C Schroeder; Paul W Sternberg
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.154

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.