Literature DB >> 32550331

An outcome analysis of videoscopic assisted retroperitoneal debridement in infected pancreatic necrosis: a single centre experience.

Dattaraj Budkule1, Gunjan Desai1, Prasad Pande1, Rajvilas Narkhede1, Prasad Wagle1, Paresh Varty1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) is a dreadful complication of moderately severe and severe acute necrotising pancreatitis (ANP). Videoscopic assisted retroperitoneal debridement (VARD) is a minimally invasive surgical option for predominantly left sided, posterior and laterally located disease in patients not responding to conservative and percutaneous options. This study aimed to present an outcome analysis of VARD in the management of IPN at our tertiary care centre.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The present retrospective analysis of prospectively entered data included 22 patients diagnosed as ANP with IPN from January 2015 to December 2017. These patients were admitted in the surgical gastroenterology unit of our tertiary care centre. The outcome of these patients managed with VARD was evaluated.
RESULTS: The aetiology of ANP was idiopathic, and gallstones were found in 7 patients each and alcohol in 8. Twelve patients were managed with a single VARD procedure; whereas, 10 required a re-debridement due to suboptimal improvement. Eighteen out of 22 patients survived whereas 4 succumbed to major postoperative bleeding/severe sepsis and multiorgan failure (Mortality 18.2%). Hospital stay after the index procedure was between 6 to 11 weeks.
CONCLUSION: VARD is a safe and effective surgical option for the management of IPN that worsens or fails to respond to conservative and percutaneous drainage options after a minimum of 4 weeks of moderately severe and severe ANP. It decreases postoperative morbidity and mortality and avoids major laparotomy, and hence, it can be considered in a selected group of patients.
Copyright © 2019, Turkish Surgical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Videoscopic assisted retroperitoneal debridement; acute necrotising pancreatitis; infected pancreatic necrosis; step up approach

Year:  2019        PMID: 32550331      PMCID: PMC6795228          DOI: 10.5578/turkjsurg.4289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Surg        ISSN: 2564-6850


  22 in total

1.  CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections.

Authors:  T C Horan; R P Gaynes; W J Martone; W R Jarvis; T G Emori
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 2.  The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Giovanni Marchegiani; Christos Dervenis; Micheal Sarr; Mohammad Abu Hilal; Mustapha Adham; Peter Allen; Roland Andersson; Horacio J Asbun; Marc G Besselink; Kevin Conlon; Marco Del Chiaro; Massimo Falconi; Laureano Fernandez-Cruz; Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo; Abe Fingerhut; Helmut Friess; Dirk J Gouma; Thilo Hackert; Jakob Izbicki; Keith D Lillemoe; John P Neoptolemos; Attila Olah; Richard Schulick; Shailesh V Shrikhande; Tadahiro Takada; Kyoichi Takaori; William Traverso; Charles R Vollmer; Christopher L Wolfgang; Charles J Yeo; Roberto Salvia; Marcus Buchler
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Risk factors of infected pancreatic necrosis secondary to severe acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Liang Ji; Jia-Chen Lv; Zeng-Fu Song; Mai-Tao Jiang; Le Li; Bei Sun
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int       Date:  2016-08

Review 4.  Advances in management of pancreatic necrosis.

Authors:  D Rohan Jeyarajah; Houssam G Osman; Shirali Patel
Journal:  Curr Probl Surg       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  Percutaneous necrosectomy and sinus tract endoscopy in the management of infected pancreatic necrosis: an initial experience.

Authors:  C R Carter; C J McKay; C W Imrie
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Case matched comparison study of the necrosectomy by retroperitoneal approach with transperitoneal approach for necrotizing pancreatitis in patients with CT severity score of 7 and above.

Authors:  Perumal Senthil Kumar; P Ravichandran; S Jeswanth
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 6.071

7.  Safety and efficacy of video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement for infected pancreatic collections: a multicenter, prospective, single-arm phase 2 study.

Authors:  Karen Horvath; Patrick Freeny; Jaime Escallon; Patrick Heagerty; Bryan Comstock; David J Glickerman; Eileen Bulger; Mika Sinanan; Lorrie Langdale; Orpheus Kolokythas; R Torrance Andrews
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2010-09

8.  Early and late complications after pancreatic necrosectomy.

Authors:  S Connor; N Alexakis; M G T Raraty; P Ghaneh; J Evans; M Hughes; C J Garvey; R Sutton; J P Neoptolemos
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 9.  Surgical management of acute necrotizing pancreatitis: a 13-year experience and a systematic review.

Authors:  V B Nieuwenhuijs; M G H Besselink; L P van Minnen; H G Gooszen
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl       Date:  2003

10.  Endoscopic or surgical step-up approach for infected necrotising pancreatitis: a multicentre randomised trial.

Authors:  Sandra van Brunschot; Janneke van Grinsven; Hjalmar C van Santvoort; Olaf J Bakker; Marc G Besselink; Marja A Boermeester; Thomas L Bollen; Koop Bosscha; Stefan A Bouwense; Marco J Bruno; Vincent C Cappendijk; Esther C Consten; Cornelis H Dejong; Casper H van Eijck; Willemien G Erkelens; Harry van Goor; Wilhelmina M U van Grevenstein; Jan-Willem Haveman; Sijbrand H Hofker; Jeroen M Jansen; Johan S Laméris; Krijn P van Lienden; Maarten A Meijssen; Chris J Mulder; Vincent B Nieuwenhuijs; Jan-Werner Poley; Rutger Quispel; Rogier J de Ridder; Tessa E Römkens; Joris J Scheepers; Nicolien J Schepers; Matthijs P Schwartz; Tom Seerden; B W Marcel Spanier; Jan Willem A Straathof; Marin Strijker; Robin Timmer; Niels G Venneman; Frank P Vleggaar; Rogier P Voermans; Ben J Witteman; Hein G Gooszen; Marcel G Dijkgraaf; Paul Fockens
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.