| Literature DB >> 32549629 |
John J Raphael1, Michael A Vacca2, Annmarie Hosie3,4,5, Natalie Rodden6, Ashley K Fernandes7,8, E Wesley Ely9,10,11.
Abstract
There is much confusion surrounding how to interpret provision of artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH) at the bedside in complicated clinical circumstances. The specific scenario that prompted these questions was a request by a patient and her family to remove a feeding tube that had become, in the patient's eyes and opinion, disproportionately burdensome in her particular set of clinical circumstances. This clinically relevant article can be viewed as a bedside interpretation of Catholic bioethical teachings on provision of ANH to the dying patient. Please note that this article does not address specific ethical issues that pertain to persistent vegetative state, which is beyond the scope of this particular discussion. © Catholic Medical Association 2020.Entities:
Keywords: ANH; Artificial nutrition and hydration; End of life; Feeding tube
Year: 2020 PMID: 32549629 PMCID: PMC7273638 DOI: 10.1177/0024363919898934
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Linacre Q ISSN: 0024-3639