| Literature DB >> 32549386 |
Heba E Hashem1, Abd El-Galil E Amr2,3, Eman S Nossier4, Elsayed A Elsayed5,6, Eman M Azmy1.
Abstract
To develop new antimicrobial agents, a series of novel thiourea derivatives incorporated with different moieties 2-13 was designed and synthesized and their biological activities were evaluated. CompoundsEntities:
Keywords: E. coli DNA B gyrase; E. coli Topoisomerase IV; antimicrobial; molecular docking; thiourea
Year: 2020 PMID: 32549386 PMCID: PMC7356696 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25122766
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Recently discovered thiourea and thiosemicarbazide derivatives having antimicrobial activities via different mechanisms of action.
Scheme 1Synthetic route for compounds 2 and 3.
Scheme 2Synthetic route for thiosemicarbazides 6–8.
Scheme 3Synthetic route for derivatives 9–11.
Scheme 4Synthetic route for derivatives 12 and 13.
Antimicrobial studies for the synthesized compounds 2–13 at 1 µg/mL measured as inhibition zone diameter (mm) by well diffusion agar assay.
| Compd. | Mean Diameter of Inhibition Zone (Mean ± SEM) (mm) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gram Positive Bacteria | Gram Negative Bacteria | Fungi | ||||
|
| 9 ± 0.61 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
|
| NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
|
| 27 ± 0.20 | 30 ± 0.26 | 21 ± 0.26 | 12 ± 0.10 | 9 ± 0.03 | 6 ± 0.22 |
|
| 30 ± 0.22 | 33 ± 0.50 | 27 ± 0.03 | 18 ± 0.22 | 24 ± 0.02 | 15 ± 0.30 |
|
| 33 ± 0.01 | 35 ± 0.26 | 26 ± 0.21 | 18 ± 0.41 | 25 ± 0.15 | 16 ± 0.12 |
|
| 39 ± 1.21 | 42 ± 0.30 | 36 ± 0.12 | 27 ± 0.62 | 27 ± 0.21 | 18 ± 0.05 |
|
| 21 ± 0.30 | 18 ± 0.25 | 9 ± 0.25 | NA | 15 ± 0.33 | 9 ± 0.20 |
|
| 15 ± 0.42 | 12 ± 0.21 | 6 ± 0.02 | NA | 6 ± 0.41 | NA |
|
| 12 ± 0.30 | 6 ± 0.53 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
|
| 22 ± 0.05 | 23 ± 0.01 | 17 ± 0.20 | 5 ± 0.58 | 18 ± 0.03 | 14 ± 0.21 |
|
| 21 ± 0.10 | 24 ± 1.11 | 15 ± 0.11 | 6 ± 0.15 | 18 ± 0.22 | 12 ± 0.46 |
|
| 24 ± 0.60 | 23 ± 0.20 | 23 ± 0.90 | 26 ± 0.25 | NA | NA |
|
| NA | NA | NA | NA | 25 ± 0.40 | 27 ± 0.21 |
NA: No Activity, Ciprofloxacin and Clotrimazole were used as antibacterial and antifungal standards, respectively, SEM = standard error mean; each value is the mean of three measures.
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC; μg/mL) of the most active derivatives.
| Compd. | MIC (Mean ± SEM) (μg/mL) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gram Positive Bacteria | Gram Negative Bacteria | Fungi | ||||
|
| 5.12 ± 0.05 | 2.29 ± 0.05 | 2.48 ± 0.11 | 7.80 ± 0.10 | 26.20 ± 0.03 | 91 ± 0.02 |
|
| 4.15 ± 0.22 | 1.39 ± 0.50 | 2.81 ± 0.01 | 4.22 ± 0.12 | 5.21 ± 0.11 | 64 ± 0.41 |
|
| 3.90 ± 0.26 | 1.46 ± 0.10 | 2.72 ± 0.15 | 4.68 ± 0.13 | 5.70 ± 0.01 | 76 ± 0.31 |
|
| 3.25 ± 1.00 | 1.38 ± 0.25 | 1.25 ± 0.50 | 0.95 ± 0.22 | 2.11 ± 0.51 | 39.8 ± 0.20 |
|
| 9.92 ± 0.30 | 8.60 ± 0.25 | 17.62 ± 0.20 | - | 20.45 ± 0.30 | 94 ± 0.10 |
|
| 5.22 ± 0.03 | 2.30 ± 0.05 | 12.50 ± 0.20 | 27 ± 0.02 | 15.60 ± 0.01 | 85 ± 0.15 |
|
| 5.60 ± 0.15 | 2.72 ± 1.11 | 13.41 ± 0.10 | 33. ± 0.10 | 14.55 ± 0.20 | 83 ± 0.22 |
|
| 5.85 ± 0.13 | 2.90 ± 0.02 | 2.90 ± 0.04 | 2.90 ± 0.25 | - | - |
|
| - | - | - | - | 4.25 ± 0.05 | 12.5 ± 0.15 |
-: Not tested, SEM = mean of the standard error; each value is the mean of three values.
Figure 2Antimicrobial activity (MIC) of the most active compounds against different bacterial and fungal A. flavus strains compared with the reference drugs, ciprofloxacin and clotrimazole, respectively.
Cytotoxic activity for the highly potent synthesized compounds against breast cancer (MCF-7) and normal kidney epithelial cell line (Vero cells).
| Compd. No. | IC50 (Mean ± SEM) (µM) a | IC50 (Mean ± SEM) (µM) a |
|---|---|---|
| MCF-7 Cells | Vero Cells | |
|
| 8.897 ± 0.37 | 92.16 ± 0.07 |
|
| 23.69 ± 0.96 | 122.81 ± 0.40 |
|
| 10.17 ± 0.65 | 149.10 ± 0.21 |
|
| 11.589 ± 0.59 | 133.26 ± 0.40 |
|
| 22.35 ± 0.36 | 144.72 ± 0.36 |
|
| 26.45 ± 0.46 | 62.45 ± 0.20 |
|
| 35.92 ± 0.85 | 79.19 ± 0.28 |
|
| 37.68 ± 0.93 | 84.11 ± 0.32 |
a IC50 values were calculated from the mean values of data from three separate experiments.
Inhibitory assay of compound 8 against Escherichia coli DNA gyrase B, E. coli Topoisomerase IV and DHFR kinases.
| Kinase | IC50 (mean ± SEM) (µM) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | Novobiocin | Methotrexate | |
|
| 0.33 ± 1.25 | 0.28 ± 1.45 | - |
|
| 19.72 ± 1.00 | 10.65 ± 1.02 | - |
|
| 189.47 ± 1.06 | - | 0.14 ± 1.62 |
IC50: Compound concentration required to inhibit the enzyme activity by 50%, SEM = Standard error mean; each value is the mean of three values.
Figure 3Two-dimensional interaction diagrams of novobiocin redocked in the active sites of E. coli DNA gyrase B (PDB ID: 1AJ6) (A) and Topoisomerase IV (PDB ID: 1S14) (B), respectively using Molecular Operating Environment (MOE) software. H-bond interactions with the proteins are shown as dashed arrows.
Figure 4Two-dimensional (A) and three-dimensional (B) interaction diagrams of compound 8 docked in the active site of E. coli DNA gyrase B (PDB ID: 1AJ6) using MOE software. H-bond interactions with the protein are shown as dashed lines.
Figure 5Two-dimensional (A) and three-dimensional (B) interaction diagrams of compound 8 docked in the active site of E. coli Topoisomerase IV (PDB ID: 1S14) using MOE software. H-bond interactions with the protein are shown as dashed lines.
Figure 6Three-dimensional representation of the docked novobiocin (red) in superimposition with compound 8 (yellow) in the active sites of E. coli DNA gyrase B (PDB ID: 1AJ6) (A) and Topoisomerase IV (PDB ID: 1S14) (B).