| Literature DB >> 32549372 |
Galyna Starchenko1, Andrіy Hrytsyk1, Ain Raal2, Оleh Koshovyi3.
Abstract
According to the WHO data (2017), depression is the most predominant disease worldwide, with about 300 million people suffering from it, and bipolar disorder is the second most common. Therefore, it is relevant to research new medicines based on medicinal herbal raw materials with anti-anxiety and antidepressant effects. Common heather (Calluna vulgaris (L.) Hull.), a flowering plant of the Ericaceae family, is a promising species for research in this area. The aim of this study was to investigate the phytochemical profile and several biological activities of hydroethanolic dry extracts from the C. vulgaris herb. Nineteen phenolic substances were identified and quantified in the extracts by HPLC. The quantitative content of the basic groups of biologically active compounds was determined by spectrophotometry. Arbutin was dominant among the hydroquinone derivatives; chlorogenic acid among the hydroxycinnamic acids; rutin, hyperoside and quercetin-3-D-glucoside among the flavonoids; and (+)-gallocatechin and (-)-epigallocatechin among the tannin metabolites. The water and hydroethanolic extract were compared, the extract of C. vulgaris herb obtained with 70% hydroethanolic had the most pronounced anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, anxiolytic, stress-protective, anti-anxiety and anti-depressant effects, and it is a promising substance for the development of new drugs or food supplements.Entities:
Keywords: Calluna vulgaris L.; anti-inflammatory; extract; neurotropic activity; phenolic substances
Year: 2020 PMID: 32549372 PMCID: PMC7356365 DOI: 10.3390/plants9060751
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Chemical profile of dry extracts of Calluna vulgaris herb.
| Substances | Content, %, | |
|---|---|---|
| Water Extract | Hydroethanolic Extract | |
| Phenols and their glycosides | ||
| Arbutin | 1.25 ± 0.05 | 0.83 ± 0.04 |
| Methylarbutin | 0.18 ± 0.03 | 0.23 ± 0.02 |
| Hydroxycinnamic acids | ||
| Chlorogenic | 1.25 ± 0.03 | 1.74 ± 0.03 |
| Caffeic | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.01 |
| Ferulic | 0.11 ± 0.02 | 0.12 ± 0.01 |
| 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | |
| Flavonoids | ||
| Rutin | 0.65 ± 0.05 | 1.25 ± 0.05 |
| Hyperoside | 0.15 ± 0.05 | 0.2 ± 0.01 |
| Quercetin-3-D-glucoside | 0.17 ± 0.03 | 0.29 ± 0.01 |
| Luteolin | 0 | 0,05 ± 0.01 |
| Apigenin | 0 | 0,04 ± 0.01 |
| Kaempferol | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0,05 ± 0.01 |
| Tannins metabolites | ||
| Gallic acid | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.13 ± 0.01 |
| (+)-Gallocatechin | 0.21 ± 0.01 | 0.94 ± 0.02 |
| (-)-Epigallocatechin | 0.95 ± 0.05 | 1.36 ± 0.09 |
| (+)-Catechin | 0.13 ± 0.03 | 0.21 ± 0.03 |
| (-)-Epicatechin | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.26 ± 0.02 |
| (-)-Catechin gallate | 0.11 ± 0.02 | 0.24 ± 0.01 |
| (-)Epicatechin gallate | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.01 |
Quantitative content (%) of different groups of phenolic substances in the dry extracts of Calluna vulgaris herb.
| The Group of BAS (Method of Analysis) | Content, | |
|---|---|---|
| Water Extract | Hydroethanolic Extract | |
| Total hydroquinone derivatives (spectrophotometry per arbutin) | 10.51 ± 0.04 | 7.86 ± 0.03 |
| Total hydroxycinnamic acids (spectrophotometry per chlorogenic acid) | 5.87 ± 0.02 | 7.92 ± 0.04 |
| Total flavonoids (spectrophotometry per rutin) | 0.89 ± 0.02 | 2.33 ± 0.07 |
| Total polyphenols (spectrophotometry per completely dry substance and pyrogallol) | 5.95 ± 0.11 | 11.08 ± 0.20 |
Figure 1Anti-exudative activity of Calluna vulgaris herb extracts.
Indicators of the peripheral blood after the exudative phase of inflammation in the study of anti-inflammatory activity of Calluna vulgaris extracts.
| Group of Animals | Indicators of Blood | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hemoglobin Content, g/L | Number of Red Blood Cells, ×1012/L | Number of Leukocytes, ×109/L | |
| Control | 128.6 ± 2.5 | 7.25 ± 0.14 | 17.56 ± 0.38 |
| Water extract | 126.08 ± 3.6 | 6.98 ± 0.24 | 14.62 ± 0.46 |
| Hydroethanolic extract | 127.71 ± 1.5 | 6.79 ± 0.09 | 12.14 ± 0.27 |
| 138.6 ± 3.7 | 7.12 ± 0.11 | 12.26 ± 0.16 | |
| Intact animals | 131.86 ± 4.8 | 7.78 ± 0.15 | 11.92 ± 0.25 |
Figure 2Comparative characteristics of the effect of investigated extracts on mice in the “Open Field” test. (A) Effect on the orienting-research behavior of mice. (B) Effect on the level of anxiety of mice.
Behavior of animals in conditions of the “Elevated Plus Maze” test.
| Indicator | Number of Animals | Groups | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group I | Group II | Control | Group III | Intact Animals | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Total number of appearances in the dark chamber | 1 | 2 ± 0.24 *,** | 1.14 ± 0.36 ** | 1.14 | 1.43 ± 0.42 * | 1.71 |
| 2 | 1.71 ± 0.20 ** | 1.43 ± 0.10 ** | 2.14 | 0.57 ± 0.04 * | 1.71 | |
| 3 | 1.43 ± 0.29 * | 2.29 ± 0.05 * | 0.71 | 0.86 ± 0.71 * | 1.43 | |
| 4 | 1.86 ± 0.14 * | 1.29 ± 0.28 ** | 1.29 | 0.57 ± 0.41 * | 1.86 | |
| 5 | 1.57 ± 0.36 * | 1.29 ± 0.79 ** | 1.29 | 1.43 ± 1 * | 1.14 | |
| Σ 1–5 | 8.57 ± 0.31 ** | 7.43 ± 0.20 ** | 6.57 | 4.86 ± 0.29 * | 7.86 | |
| Total time of staying in the dark branches of the maze, s | 1 | 19 ± 0.01 ** | 18.14 ± 0.17 ** | 18.86 | 40.71 ± 0.10 * | 45.57 |
| 2 | 23.57 ± 0.09 ** | 18.43 ± 0.02 ** | 24.43 | 40.86 ± 0.17 * | 45.57 | |
| 3 | 23.71 ± 0.02 ** | 33.43 ± 0.12 ** | 22.71 | 44.43 ± 0.24 * | 51.86 | |
| 4 | 23.14 ± 0.02 ** | 32.71 ± 0.24 ** | 21.86 | 47.14 ± 0.11 * | 46.14 | |
| 5 | 13.86 ± 0.02 ** | 33.57 ± 0.17 ** | 22.71 | 42.57 ± 0.04 * | 54.57 | |
| Σ 1–5 | 103.29 ± 0.02 ** | 136.29 ± 0.04 ** | 110.57 | 215.71 ± 0.09 * | 243.71 | |
| Total number of appearances in the central location | 1 | 2.86 ± 0.24 ** | 2.29 ± 0.58 * | 2 | 2 ± 1 * | 1.43 |
| 2 | 3.14 ± 0.40 ** | 2.57 ± 0.34 ** | 2.86 | 1.86 ± 0.20 * | 2.43 | |
| 3 | 2.14 ± 0.35 ** | 2.29 ± 0.27 ** | 2 | 1.14 ± 0.10 * | 1.14 | |
| 4 | 3.43 ± 0.07 ** | 2 ± 0.60 * | 2.14 | 1.14 ± 0.22 * | 2.43 | |
| 5 | 2.57 ± 0.23 ** | 1.14 ± 0.20 * | 2.29 | 1.72 ± 0.68 * | 1 | |
| Σ 1–5 | 14.14 ± 0.12 ** | 10.29 ± 0.49 ** | 11.29 | 7.86 ± 0.31 * | 8.43 | |
| Total number of appearances in the illuminated branches of the maze | 1 | 1.57 ± 0.22 ** | 1 ± 0.36 ** | 1.14 | 0.71 ± 0.10 * | 0.86 |
| 2 | 0.86 ± 0.46 ** | 0.86 ± 0.42 ** | 0.71 | 0.57 ± 0.59 * | 0.14 | |
| 3 | 0.71 ± 0.41 ** | 0.71 ± 0.41 ** | 0.57 | 0.29 ± 0.36 * | 0.43 | |
| 4 | 0.86 ± 0.09 ** | 0.43 ± 0.36 *.** | 0.71 | 0.14 ± 0.17 * | 0.71 | |
| 5 | 1.14 ± 0.06 ** | 0.29 ± 0.27 * | 0.71 | 0.43 ± 0.42 * | 0.14 | |
| Σ 1–5 | 5.14 ± 0.04 ** | 3.29 ± 0.27 ** | 3.86 | 2.14 ± 0.07 * | 2.29 | |
| Total time of staying in the illuminated branches of the maze, s | 1 | 35.14 ± 0.02 ** | 34.71 ± 0.11 ** | 32.71 | 14.71 ± 0.11 * | 7.14 |
| 2 | 26.57 ± 0.20 ** | 36.29 ± 0.04 ** | 22.71 | 15 ± 0.60 * | 6 | |
| 3 | 27.43 ± 0.01 ** | 20.14 ± 0.11 ** | 25.86 | 7.14 ± 0.08 * | 3.86 | |
| 4 | 25.14 ± 0.07 ** | 19.43 ± 0.13 ** | 27.43 | 9.43 ± 0.24 | 8.86 | |
| 5 | 24.14 ± 0.11 ** | 18.29 ± 0.17 ** | 24.86 | 10.71 ± 0.11 * | 0.86 | |
| Σ 1–5 | 138.43 ± 0.04 ** | 128.86 ± 0.02 ** | 133.57 | 57 ± 0.11 * | 26.71 | |
| Total time of staying in the central location, s | 1 | 5.86 ± 0.86 ** | 7.14 ± 0.31 ** | 8.43 | 4.57 ± 1 * | 7.29 |
| 2 | 9.86 ± 0.15 ** | 5.29 ± 0.07 * | 12.86 | 3.14 ± 0.07 * | 8.43 | |
| 3 | 8.86 ± 0.73 ** | 6.43 ± 0.34 * | 11.43 | 8.43 ± 0.46 * | 4.29 | |
| 4 | 10.29 ± 0.12 ** | 7.86 ± 0.61 * | 10.71 | 3.43 ± 0.17 * | 5 | |
| 5 | 22 ± 0.06 ** | 8.14 ± 0.34 * | 12.43 | 6.71 ± 0.17 * | 4.57 | |
| Σ 1–5 | 56.86 ± 0.12 ** | 34.86 ± 0.23 * | 55.86 | 26.29 ± 0.23 * | 29.57 | |
| Number of cases of looking down (risk assessment) | 1 | 4.86 ± 0.09 ** | 2.57 ± 0.91 ** | 2.43 | 2.57 ± 1 * | 1.29 |
| 2 | 3.14 ± 0.40 * | 3.29 ± 0.10 * | 1.71 | 2.14 ± 0.78 * | 0.57 | |
| 3 | 3.71 ± 0.23 */** | 1.57 ± 0.10 * | 2.14 | 2.14 ± 0.89 * | 0.43 | |
| 4 | 3.57 ± 0.02 ** | 1.29 ± 0.20 * | 2.86 | 1.43 ± 0.34 * | 0.71 | |
| 5 | 4.57 ± 0.04 ** | 1.71 ± 0.05 * | 3.57 | 1.43 ± 0.07 * | 0.29 | |
| Σ 1–5 | 19.86 ± 0.02 ** | 10.43 ± 0.17 * | 12.71 | 9.71 ± 0.75 * | 3.29 | |
| The latent period of the first appearance in the branch of the maze | 0.07 ± 0.34 ** | 0.36 ± 0.28 * | 0.78 | 0.8 ± 0.79 * | 1.52 | |
Note: Group I—animals treated with hydroethanolic extract, group II—animals treated with water extract, group III—animals treated with Hypericum tincture, n—number of animals, *—the reliability of deviations in relation to the control group data, **—the reliability of deviations in relation to the reference group data (p ≤ 0.05).
Behavior of animals in conditions of the “Porsolt Forced Swim Test”.
| Groups of Animals | Latent Period of The First “Fading” | Active Swimming, s | Passive Swimming, s | Total Time of Immobility, s | Number of Dives | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Day 1 of experiment | 3.47 ± 0.46 * | 190.29 ± 0.17 * | 156 ± 0.86 * | 13.71 ± 0.10 ** | 3.43 ± 0.06 ** |
| Group II | 3.23 ± 0.46 * | 93.43 ± 0.12 ** | 217.71 ± 0.01 ** | 48.86 ± 0.11 * | 2.43 ± 0.28 ** | |
| Group III | 3.25 ± 0.39 * | 136.14 ± 0.73 * | 156.14 ± 0.73 * | 67.71 ± 0.23 * | 0.14 ± 0.10 * | |
| Control | 4.09 | 157.14 | 177 | 25.86 | 1.86 | |
| Intact animals | 3.07 | 98 | 201 | 61 | 1.29 | |
| Group I | Day 3 of experiment | 3.73 ± 0.75 * | 99.57 ± 0.11 ** | 245.29 ± 0.55 ** | 15.14 ± 0.46 ** | 0.86 |
| Group II | 2.98 ± 0.49 ** | 83.29 ± 0.61 ** | 226.71 ± 0.17 * | 50 ± 0.31 * | 0 | |
| Group III | 3.85 ± 0.61 * | 58.71 ± 0.61 * | 263.29 ± 0.86 * | 38 ± 0.49 * | 0 | |
| Control | 3.4 | 71.14 | 263.43 | 25.43 | 0.14 | |
| Intact animals | 2.4 | 78.86 | 141.57 | 107 | 2.43 | |
| Group I | Day 5 of experiment | 2.89 ± 0.34 * | 72.14 ± 0.17 * | 215 ± 0.39 * | 62.14 ± 0.61 ** | 0.57 |
| Group II | 3.26 ± 0.60 **/* | 45.29 ± 0.02 * | 260.14 ± 0.12 * | 45 ± 0.34 ** | 0.14 | |
| Group III | 2.22 ± 0.31 * | 58.57 ± 0.02 * | 215.14 ± 0.39 * | 86.29 ± 0.17 * | 0.57 | |
| Intact animals | 3.15 | 34.14 | 297 | 43.14 | 0 | |
Note: Group I—animals treated with hydroethanolic extract, group II—animals treated with water extract, group III—animals treated with Hypericum tincture, n—number of animals, *—the reliability of deviations in relation to the control group data, **—the reliability of deviations in relation to the reference group data (p ≤ 0.05).
Behavior of animals in conditions of the “Cube” test.
| The Investigated Indicator | Group I | Group II | Control | Group III | Intact Animals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latent period of the first approach to the cube, s | 0.46 ± 0.01 ** | 1.64 ± 0.46 * | 2.73 | 1.73 ± 0.34 * | 0.72 |
| Total number of approaches to the cube | 5.00 ± 0.07 * | 3.71 ± 0.46 * | 2.71 | 3.86 ± 0.27 * | 6.71 |
| Total time of the cube examination, s | 9.43 ± 0.34 * | 14.57 ± 0.02 | 4.43 | 7.43 ± 0.24 * | 8.86 |