Jose Angel Barragan1, Carlos Ponce de León2, Juan Roberto Alemán Castro1, Aarón Peregrina-Lucano3, Felipe Gómez-Zamudio1, Erika Roxana Larios-Durán1. 1. Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Universidad de Guadalajara, Blvd. M. García Barragán #1451, C.P. 44430 Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico. 2. Laboratorio de Ingeniería Electroquímica, Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica, Universidad de Southampton, Highfield, SO17 1BJ Southampton, U.K. 3. Departamento de Farmacobiología, Universidad de Guadalajara, Blvd. M. García Barragán #1451, C.P. 44430 Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico.
Abstract
A strategy for the efficient recovery of highly pure copper and antimony metals from electronic waste (e-waste) was implemented by the combination of hydrometallurgical and electrochemical processes. The focus is on copper recovery as the main component in the leached solution, whereas the antimony recovery process was established as a purification step in order to achieve a highly pure copper deposit. The strategy includes mechanical methods to reduce the size of the wasted printed circuit boards to enhance the efficiency of antimony and copper lixiviation via ferric chloride in acidic media (0.5 M HCl) followed by an electrowinning process. In order to establish the best parameters for copper electrowinning, the leached solution was characterized by cyclic voltammetry and cathodic polarization. Then, an electrochemical reactor with a rotating cylinder electrode was used to evaluate the copper concentration decay, the cathodic current efficiency, the specific energy consumption, and mass-transfer coefficient. Furthermore, antimony was recovered via precipitation by a pH modification in accordance with the Pourbaix diagram. Under this methodology, two valuable products from the e-waste were recovered: a 96 wt % pure copper deposit and 81 wt % pure antimony precipitate. The strategy for recovery of other metal ions, such as lead, present in the e-waste at high concentrations will be reported in further works.
A strategy for the efficient recovery of highly pure copper and antimony metals from electronic waste (e-waste) was implemented by the combination of hydrometallurgical and electrochemical processes. The focus is on copper recovery as the main component in the leached solution, whereas the antimony recovery process was established as a purification step in order to achieve a highly pure copper deposit. The strategy includes mechanical methods to reduce the size of the wasted printed circuit boards to enhance the efficiency of antimony and copper lixiviation via ferric chloride in acidic media (0.5 M HCl) followed by an electrowinning process. In order to establish the best parameters for copper electrowinning, the leached solution was characterized by cyclic voltammetry and cathodic polarization. Then, an electrochemical reactor with a rotating cylinder electrode was used to evaluate the copper concentration decay, the cathodic current efficiency, the specific energy consumption, and mass-transfer coefficient. Furthermore, antimony was recovered via precipitation by a pH modification in accordance with the Pourbaix diagram. Under this methodology, two valuable products from the e-waste were recovered: a 96 wt % pure copper deposit and 81 wt % pure antimony precipitate. The strategy for recovery of other metal ions, such as lead, present in the e-waste at high concentrations will be reported in further works.
Rapid advances in electronic
technologies has led to a large number
of equipment being replaced periodically by new models resulting in
an exponential accumulation of obsolete devices without an adequate
decommissioning treatment. Around 50 million metric tons of waste
was produced at the end of 2018.[1] The main
implications of e-waste accumulation are the environmental and human
health risk due the hazardous materials contained in the printed circuit
boards (PCBs).[2,3] Waste printed circuit boards (WPCBs)
represent 6% of the total weight of e-waste, and its main content
is ferrous and non-ferrous metals, which can leak into the environment
and cause pollution. Adequate decommissioning could convert this waste
into source of income due to the high economic value of gold, palladium,
silver, and copper, among others metals.[4,5]Adequate
recycling of the e-waste including WPCBs will prevent
environmental pollution and the recovery and recycling of valuable
metals. Several methods such as mechanical processes for size reduction,[5−8] concentration via reverse flotation,[9] froth flotation,[10] and fluidization,[11,12] have been proposed by governments and research institutions. Physical-mechanical
processes are only a pretreatment for size reduction and concentration
of metallic fractions followed by pyrometallurgical techniques or
hydrometallurgical processes.[3] The recovery
of precious metals such as gold and palladium,[13,14] copper,[15,16] and rare earths[17] through pyrolysis methods has the disadvantage of using high temperatures
and only partial separation, whereby further processing and refining
are required.[18,19] Hydrometallurgical processes
are preferred over pyrometallurgical because of their high selectivity
and lower energy consumption.[20,21]In the case of
copper, the common hydrometallurgical recovery method
includes chemical leaching in sulphuric,[22−25] nitric,[26,27] or hydrochloric acids[28−30] combined with different oxidants
such as air, ferric chloride, ferric sulfate, or hydrogen peroxide.
The leaching process in these acidic media has been extensively studied.[31−33] Nevertheless, although leaching copper is currently a successful
process, the applied techniques could improve, especially the recovery
of metal ions from the leached solutions. In recent years, the strategy
adopted by some researchers has been the incorporation of electrochemical
recovery steps, which implies a fundamental understanding of electrochemical
reactors. However, these processes use simple reactor geometries and
mainly focus on the leaching process without considering electrochemical
engineering analysis such as mass transport, fluid flow conditions
or electrode sizes, and scalability. In addition, only few parameters,
such as current efficiency and the amount recovered are evaluated.
As a result, the electrochemical ion recovery treatment is lacking
efficient technical characterization and from the electrochemical
engineering point of view,[33] the process
requires adequate and more complex analysis to establish the viability
and influence of all electrochemical technical parameters. The problem
is still more complicated in the case of multi-metal chloride solutions,
which has been poorly studied due its highly corrosive behavior and
the complexity to obtain highly pure metals. In this way, Table presents the work
reported about copper electrowinning from chloride multi-metal solutions.
Table 1
Reported Processes for Cu Electrowinning
from Multi-Metal Ions in Chloride Media
metal recovered
metal ions
in solution
metal recovery
rate (%)
purity metal
recovered (%)
reactor geometry
used
reference
Cu
Cu, Ag, Sn, Pb, Zn, Fe,
Ni
Cu (45)
Cu (>99)
three chamber electrochemical
reactor
(34)
Cu, Te
Cu, Te
Cu (95), Te (85)
Cu (93.2), Te (98.3)
emew cell
(35)
Cu, Bi
Cu. Bi, As, Sb, Pb
Cu (97.8), Bi (97.8)
Cu–Bi alloy (42–58), Bi (98)
emew cell
(36)
Cu, Pb, Cd, Zn
Cu, Pb, Cd, Zn
not mentioned
Cu, Pb, Cd, Zn > 99% mol
conventional three
electrode
cell
(37)
On the other hand, the world supply of antimony is
based on minerology,
where the main source involves a pyrochemical process and the hydrometallurgical
route has been poorly approached. Consequently, until now, only one
commercial hydrometallurgical production process has been successfully
stablish by the Hunan Chenzhou Mining Group Co., Ltd in China.[38]This work presents a systematic methodology
for copper and antimony
recovery from WPCBs that will allow identifying the key parameters
to increase the process efficiency. Unlike previous studies, which
focus on metal recovery from e-waste, this study presents an analysis
of the hydrometallurgy characteristics followed by an electrochemical
process that uses a rotating cylinder electrode (RCE) electrochemical
reactor. The RCE reactor was selected because of its well-known regular
geometry,[39,40] efficient and predictable flow fluid patterns,
and adaptability to metal-ion recovery.[41−44] Furthermore, the reactor adapts
to different sizes, maintaining similar fluid flow and mass-transfer
patterns.[45] The RCE reactor has been deeply
studied and used in many electrochemical processes; however, as far
as the authors know, its application in a complex process dealing
with a real multimetallic solution obtained from the leaching of e-waste
has not been previously explored. The reactor was characterized by
a synthetic copper solution at the same concentration of metal ions
of the actual hydrometallurgical leaching process. The antimony is
recovered from the leached solution by precipitation. Figures of merit
such as conversion, current efficiency, specific energy consumption,
and mass-transfer coefficient were determined. Two valuable products,
highly pure metal copper and antimony salt were obtained; their purity
was determined by energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). The recovery
of other metal ions in high concentration different from copper and
antimony found in this paper will be reported in future works.
Methodology and Materials
Materials
The
WPCBs treated in this
work were obtained from a local collector in Guadalajara City, Mexico,
and mainly included RAM memories and integrated chips circuits of
different computer and phone models and manufactures.
Mechanical Process
A wet mechanical
process for size reduction and concentration of the samples was implemented
by using a purpose-built ball miller of 95 dm3 volume.
The flow diagram of this process is shown in Figure . The WPCBs were mixed in a 1:1 weight ratio
with running tap water and grinded for 2 h. The content (branch A
in Figure ) was transferred
to a 100 dm3 capacity tank for 48 h sedimentation. The
sediment (branch C) was separated in two (branches D and E) with a
100-grid sieve, whereas the supernatant solution (branch B) was filtered
with 15 μm pore filter paper. The water was returned to the
initial point of the process (branch G), whereas the solids were dried
at room temperature for 72 h and submitted to a leaching process (branch
F). It should be noticed that concentration of copper and gold in
branch F also corresponds to that in branch B (see Table ). The treatment to the sediment
(fractions D and E) will be published and discussed in a future investigation
due the complexity of the high concentrations and variety of metals
in this fraction. The metals in the solid material (branches A, B
or F, C, D, and E.) were extracted by cupellation and the concentration
of gold and copper was analyzed by atomic absorption spectrometry.
In the following sections, only the recovery of copper is described,
whereas the gold recovery process will be reported in a further paper.
Figure 1
Flow diagram
of the mechanical process.
Table 2
Copper and Gold Concentration at Each
Branch Depicted in the Flow Diagram for the Mechanical Process
branch
Au (wt %)
Cu (wt %)
A
0.05
32.57
B, F
0.02
1.60
C
0.24
58.53
D
0.01
65.19
E
0.66
46.30
Flow diagram
of the mechanical process.
Hydrometallurgical Process
The leaching
experiments were performed with the dried solids in branch F in a
1 dm3 glass reactor fitted with a propeller at room temperature.
The leaching solution consisted of 0.5 mol dm–3 hydrochloric
acid (HCl) and 0.074 mol dm–3 ferric chloride (FeCl3) in distilled water[33] at a 1:10
solid/liquid (w/v) ratio stirred at 600 rpm for 24 h. The concentration
of the metal ions in the leached solution was quantified by an inductively
coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES, Thermo Elemental
IRIS Intrepid IID).
Electrochemical Characterization
The leached solution was characterized by cyclic voltammetry. In
order to identify the contribution of each metal ion, synthetic solutions
of each ion at the concentrations found in the leached solution, were
characterized separately. The cyclic voltammetries were performed
in a typical three-electrode cell with a vitreous carbon working electrode
of 0.05 cm2 geometrical area and a platinum disc of 0.03
cm2 as the counter electrode. A saturated calomel electrode
(SCE) was used as the reference electrode for all electrochemical
characterizations and a computer-controlled potentiostat/galvanostat
AUTOLAB model PGSTAT128N, fitted with the NOVA 2.0 software. The cyclic
voltammetries started at the OCP value toward negative potentials
at 50 mV s–1.In order to identify the kinetic
and mass-transfer control zones of the electroreduction of copper
ions, cathodic polarization curves were performed by using a copper
rotating disk electrode (RDE) of 0.32 cm2 geometrical area
as the working electrode and a graphite rod of 0.42 cm2 as the counter electrode. The experiments were performed in a 0.1
dm3 cell containing the synthetic copper solution prepared
in the laboratory with 0.5 mol dm–3 HCl, 0.074 mol
dm–3 FeCl3, and 1200 mg dm–3 copper. The cathodic polarization curves were obtained at different
rotation speeds f, between 100 ≤ f ≤ 600 rpm corresponding to the angular velocities between
10.5 ≤ ω ≤ 62.8 s–1 with a PINE
rotor connected to the working electrode at a scan rate of 50 mV s–1.
Antimony Recovery and Electrolyte
Purification
The Pourbaix diagrams for antimony were constructed
with HSC Chemistry
6.0 software to identify the predominance of the Sb species as a function
of E(V) and pH in order to have a thermodynamic understanding
of antimony chemistry for its recovery. Based on the Pourbaix diagrams,
the pH of the solution was modified from an initial value of 0.5–2.4
by adding 99.99 wt % pure NaOH crystals, and a precipitate was obtained
from this procedure. The volume of the leached solution was 1100 cm3 and 26 g of NaOH crystals were required to reach the final
pH. Using NaOH crystals instead of a saturated NaOH solution avoids
diluting the copper ions in the leached solution. The precipitate
was analyzed by EDS (Bruker), whereas the final solution was analyzed
by ICP-OES to determine the concentration of copper and antimony ions
after this process.
RCE Electrochemical Reactor
An in-house
design RCE electrochemical reactor was used for recovering copper
ions from the leached solution by electrolysis. The reactor container
was built up with the Nylamid polymer. An electrolytic grade copper
cylinder of 3.8 cm diameter and 10 cm length was the cathode, whereas
a graphite hollow cylinder with an inner diameter of 8 and 10 cm length
was the anode. The geometrical areas of the cathode and anode exposed
to the electrolyte were 120 and 251 cm2, respectively.
The rotation rate of the cathode was 50 rpm corresponding to a Reynolds
number (Re) of 15120. The Reynolds number is defined
as Re = ud/ν, where d is the RCE diameter in cm, u the RCE
angular velocity in cm s–1, and ν the electrolyte
kinematic viscosity in cm2 s–1.[46]
Cu Recovery in RCE Electrochemical
Reactor
A constant electrode potential of −0.45 V
versus SCE was
applied to the RCE electrochemical reactor for 2400 s. Samples of
1 cm3 were taken every 8 min in order to follow the copper-ion
concentration. After the electrolysis, the copper deposited on the
cylinder was scraped with care to avoid damaging the electrode surface
and the composition was analyzed by EDS (Bruker).The electrochemical
reactor was evaluated in terms of conversion, current efficiency,
and specific energy consumption. These parameters were calculated
according to the following equations:[47]where c and c0 are
the concentration of
copper ions at t > 0 and at t =
0, respectively, in mol cm–3, n is the number of electrons transferred (equiv mol–1), F the Faraday constant, VR the reaction volume in cm3, I the current in amperes, Ecell the cell
voltage in volts, and M the molecular weight of the
reactant ion in g mol–1.
Results
and Discussion
Figure shows the
flow diagram of
the experimental conditions during the process, whereas Table presents the gold and copper
content as solid metal concentrations (wt %) obtained at each step.
After the sedimentation process, the concentrations of gold and copper
in the branch C were 4.8 and 1.8 times higher than the initial values
in branch A, respectively [0.24 wt % Au and 58.53 wt % Cu in branch
C, whereas previously in branch A, they were 0.05 wt % Au and 32.57
wt % Cu]. Low concentrations of metals, as those obtained in the solids
at the supernatant solution, branch B, also F, [0.02 wt % Au, 1.6
wt % Cu] are suitable for the leaching process and the electrochemical
recovery. High concentrations, as those obtained in branches D [0.01
wt % Au, 65.19 wt % Cu] and E [0.66 wt % Au, 46.3 wt % Cu] are more
complex to deal with. Future research will be needed to discuss the
treatment of these branches (D and E), and the results will be published
in future papers. The focus of this study is on the leaching process,
branch F (the metal concentrations at branch F corresponds to those
in branch B), and the copper electrochemical recovery, branch H.Table shows the concentration
of the different metal ions present in solution after the leaching
process, branch H in Figure . The highest concentration corresponds to copper ions and
one of the lowest to gold ions, which is in accordance with the e-waste
characterization reported in Section . In addition, other metals ions were identified
at this point even though in lower concentrations than copper. The
concentrations of antimony, nickel, and lead would require a complete
electrochemical characterization in order to identify and avoid interferences
in the electrochemical recovery of copper, as well as to stablish
the route to their recovery.
Table 3
Metal Ion Concentration
in the Leached
Solution Characterized by ICP-OES from Branch H in Figure
metal ion
concentration (mg dm–3)
metal ion
concentration (mg dm–3)
Cu
1200
W
4.62
Au
1.8
Pd
0.38
Sb
430
Ag
1.43
Ni
80
Ti
1.78
Pb
400
Ba
13.87
Figure a shows a
typical cyclic voltammetry response of several solutions; the blue
line was obtained with the leached solution, branch H. The red line
corresponds to the voltammetry response of the synthetic solution
with 1200 mg dm–3 copper, and the black line represents
the voltammetry for the leaching solution before the leaching process. Figure b–d depict
the cyclic voltammetry for synthetic solutions for antimony, nickel,
and lead ions, respectively, at the same concentration as those of
the leached solution, branch H, cited in Table .
Figure 2
Electrochemical characterization by cyclic voltammetry
of leached
and synthetic solutions. (a) Black line corresponds to the leaching
solution, red and blue lines correspond to the synthetic copper solution
and leached solution with 1200 mg dm–3 of copper,
respectively; cyclic voltammetry of (b) 430 mg dm–3 antimony; (c) 80 mg dm–3 nickel, and (d) 400 mg
dm–3 lead. All solutions with 0.5 mol dm–3 HCl, 0.074 mol dm–3 FeCl3, and the
corresponding ion concentration at a scan rate of 50 mV s–1 on vitreous carbon with a surface area of 0.05 cm2.
Electrochemical characterization by cyclic voltammetry
of leached
and synthetic solutions. (a) Black line corresponds to the leaching
solution, red and blue lines correspond to the synthetic copper solution
and leached solution with 1200 mg dm–3 of copper,
respectively; cyclic voltammetry of (b) 430 mg dm–3 antimony; (c) 80 mg dm–3 nickel, and (d) 400 mg
dm–3 lead. All solutions with 0.5 mol dm–3 HCl, 0.074 mol dm–3 FeCl3, and the
corresponding ion concentration at a scan rate of 50 mV s–1 on vitreous carbon with a surface area of 0.05 cm2.The CV curves in Figure a show that the reduction and oxidation processes
of the leaching
solution, black line, are minimal compared to the redox characteristics
of the leached solution, branch H. The synthetic copper solution,
red line, presents a slightly visible reduction process in the potential
range of 0.3–0.2 V versus SCE related to the reduction of copper
from Cu(II) to Cu(I) and a process associated to the reduction of
Cu(I) to Cu(0) at potentials between −0.25 and −0.5
V versus SCE. In addition, the synthetic copper solution, red line,
presents two oxidation processes attributed to the Cu(0) to Cu(I)
and Cu(I) to Cu(II) oxidations in the intervals of −0.25 to
−0.1 and 0.1 to 0.25 V versus SCE, respectively.[48] This phenomenon is in good agreement with the
literature for the reduction process of copper ions in chloride media,
where copper reduction takes place in two single-electron transfer
steps because Cu(I) is stabilized by chloride ions.[49] The same redox signals are observed for the leached solution, Figure a blue line; however,
some differences are evident: first, two reduction signals are presented,
a wider reduction peak from −0.3 to −0.75 V versus SCE
which overlaps with another one that shows a small shoulder from −0.5
to −0.4 V versus SCE. This behavior can be indeed associated
to the reduction signal of copper, but also to the reduction processes
of lead and antimony ions, which are observed between −0.5
and −0.8 V versus SCE and from −0.3 to −0.5 V
versus SCE, respectively, as is clearly shown in Figure b,d. The oxidation process
in the leached solution, blue line, presents some differences in comparison
with the synthetic copper solution, red line. First of all, two oxidation
signals are observed, the first one in the range of −0.25 to
−0.1 V versus SCE and the other between 0.5 and 0.75 V versus
SCE associated to the reduction of copper and antimony, respectively.On the other hand, Figure c shows the voltammetric response of a synthetic solution
of nickel ions, the reduction process takes place at around 0.25 V
versus SCE; whereas its oxidation is observed at around 0.7 V versus
SCE. The electrochemical response of nickel ions is not observed in
the voltammetry response of the leached solution, Figure a blue line, because nickel
ions are presented at 80 mg dm–3, which is lower
than copper, lead, and antimony concentration as shown in Table . This conclusion
is in good agreement with the results summarized in Table ; the ions at the highest concentrations
are the ones that have the greatest current response in their reduction/oxidation
processes and overlap the electrochemical responses from the ions
at lower concentrations. The metal ions in the second column of Table were not analyzed
because they do not interfere significantly with the quality of copper
deposition, and they are not of strong economic interest at those
low concentrations, although from the environmental perspective, it
will be necessary to remove them. Future research will be needed to
increase their concentration and subsequent recuperation.From
the potential reduction ranges for copper and antimony presented
above, a highly pure copper deposit is not possible to achieve in
the presence of antimony. This is in accordance with the thermodynamic
data available from the literature;[50] for
these reasons, a purification process to remove and recover antimony
ion was implemented as described in Section . The recovery of Pb ions will be discussed
in future work.
Determination of Electrolysis
Potential for
Cu Electrowinning
The optimal electrode potential at which
copper ions deposit on a copper bulk electrode was determined by the
polarization curves shown in Figure , which represent the RDE experiments of a synthetic
solution with 1200 mg dm–3 copper (0.018 mol dm–3). This solution emulates the copper concentration
in the real leached solution. Looking at the current–potential
curves in Figure ,
the potential range of copper deposition depends on the rotation rate.
At 100 rpm, the reduction process occurs in the interval of −0.36
> E < −1.0 V versus SCE. As can be observed,
in this polarization interval, the process is controlled by mass transfer;
however, the polarization interval diminishes as the rotation rate
increases, reaching an interval between −0.5 > E < −0.8 V versus SCE at the highest rotation speed of 600
rpm. In all cases, the hydrogen evolution reaction occurs at more
negative polarization potentials, which should be avoided in order
to reach high current efficiencies.
Figure 3
Cathodic polarization curves at different
angular velocities in
a copper RDE with a geometric area of 0.32 cm2 for a synthetic
solution with 0.5 mol dm–3 HCl, 0.074 mol dm–3 FeCl3, and 1200 mg dm–3 Cu (0.0189 mol dm–3) at a scan rate of 50 mV s–1.
Cathodic polarization curves at different
angular velocities in
a copper RDE with a geometric area of 0.32 cm2 for a synthetic
solution with 0.5 mol dm–3 HCl, 0.074 mol dm–3 FeCl3, and 1200 mg dm–3 Cu (0.0189 mol dm–3) at a scan rate of 50 mV s–1.The electrolysis potential
at which reduction of copper is a mass
transfer control process on the RCE electrochemical reactor was selected
at −0.45 V versus SCE and 50 rpm. This polarization potential
will avoid the deposition of other metal ions with a more negative
reduction potential than −0.45 V versus SCE, such as lead ions.
If more metals are present in the leached solution, a purification
process will be required to avoid their electroreduction on the RCE
at the polarization potential close or more positive than −0.45
V versus SCE.Figure shows the E versus pH diagram for antimony
in aqueous media in the
presence of chloride ions. According to the diagram, at the pH of
the leached solution, corresponding to 0.5, antimony is stable as
an SbO+ complex and at a pH higher than 1, the SbO+ complex will precipitate asSb2O3(s). The chloride ions do not interfere with the stability of Sb species
under this experimental condition.
Figure 4
Pourbaix diagrams constructed with HSC
Chemistry 6.0 software at
the corresponding concentrations of antimony and chloride ions (Sb
0.0035 mol dm–3, Cu 0.0189 mol dm–3, Pb 0.002 mol dm–3, Ni 0.0014 mol dm–3, Fe 0.07 mol dm–3, Cl 0.57 mol dm–3).
Pourbaix diagrams constructed with HSC
Chemistry 6.0 software at
the corresponding concentrations of antimony and chloride ions (Sb
0.0035 mol dm–3, Cu 0.0189 mol dm–3, Pb 0.002 mol dm–3, Ni 0.0014 mol dm–3, Fe 0.07 mol dm–3, Cl 0.57 mol dm–3).In order to ensure the precipitation
of SbO+ to Sb2O3(S), the pH value
of the leached solution was
changed from its original value of 0.5 to 2.4 by adding 99.99 wt %
pure NaOH crystals to avoid the copper ions dilution. The precipitated
salt was analyzed by EDS. Figure shows the precipitate obtained by this procedure and
the results of the analysis, which indicate that the predominant element
in the sample is antimony, however a slight signal corresponds to
copper. The quantitative results of this analysis report a concentration
corresponding to 81 wt % Sb2O3(s). On the other
hand, an analysis by ICP-OES reveals that after changing the pH, the
final Cu and Sb ion concentrations in the leached solution was 1060
and 6.38 mg dm–3, respectively. The increment in
the pH value is an adequate methodology to purify the leached solution,
reaching 98.5% depletion of antimony by precipitation. The Cu ions
concentration determined by the ICP-OES analysis of the leached solution
corresponds to the concentration fed to the RCE reactor.
Figure 5
EDS results
of the precipitate in the leached solution after pH
modification and the precipitate obtained. (Photo taken by the authors).
EDS results
of the precipitate in the leached solution after pH
modification and the precipitate obtained. (Photo taken by the authors).
Copper Recovery and Performance
Analysis of
the RCE Electrochemical Reactor
The RCE electrochemical reactor
was operated for 2400 s at −0.45 V versus SCE as selected from Figure . During the electrolysis,
the concentration of copper decreased as a function of time as shown
in Figure a from 1060
mg dm–3 (16 × 10–3 mol dm–3) to 110 mg dm–3 (1.73 × 10–3 mol dm–3) after 2400 s.
Figure 6
Performance
parameters in the RCE for Cu(II) recovery operating
at −0.45 V vs SCE and 50 rpm for the real
leached solution (0.5 mol dm–3 HCl, 0.074 mol dm–3 FeCl3 and 1060 mg dm–3 Cu) from e waste. (a) Depletion of Cu(II) ions in solution; (b)
specific energy consumption, Es; (c) Current
efficiency, ϑ %; (d) conversion, X(t). (b–d) were constructed using eqs –3.
Performance
parameters in the RCE for Cu(II) recovery operating
at −0.45 V vs SCE and 50 rpm for the real
leached solution (0.5 mol dm–3 HCl, 0.074 mol dm–3 FeCl3 and 1060 mg dm–3 Cu) from e waste. (a) Depletion of Cu(II) ions in solution; (b)
specific energy consumption, Es; (c) Current
efficiency, ϑ %; (d) conversion, X(t). (b–d) were constructed using eqs –3.The performance parameters of
the RCE reactor were determined using eqs –3. Figure d
shows that up to 90% conversion was achieved in 2400 s. Figure c,b) show the current efficiency
and the specific energy consumption, respectively, for the deposition
of metallic copper onto the RCE. Both parameters maintained almost
constant values during the first 800 s; this behavior is due to the
high concentration of copper, which is the main reaction over other
secondary reactions. At higher times, the value of the current efficiency
decreases almost linearly to a final value of 73%, which is still
acceptable if compared with values reported in the literature. For
example, the current efficiency for nickel recovery in a RCE electrochemical
reactor from emulated industrial discharges, started at low concentrations
(i.e., 200 mg dm–3), was 60% and was still an economically
viable benefit.[51] Opposite behavior was
observed for the specific energy consumption, which increases with
time after 900 s to a final value of 1.75 kW h kg–1 at 2400 s. The changes observed in Figure c,b are associated to the depletion of copper
ions as a function of time (as is shown in Figure a). As expected, the current efficiency decreases,
and the specific energy increases when the copper concentration in
the solution decays more than 50% of the initial value. At low concentrations,
secondary reactions such ashydrogen evolution take place. For instance,
in the case of the global current efficiencies, the values in this
work are higher than those previously reported by Fogarasi et al.,[52] who achieved a global cathodic current efficiency
of 63.84% in 240 min in a flow cell, operating at 4 mA cm–2 and a flow rate of 200 mL min–1 with static electrodes
and a similar leaching system for copper recovery. The differences
in the energetics values reported are associated to the electrochemical
reactor configurations and operation mode, besides that the RCE diminishes
considerably the operation time. On the other hand, the specific energy
consumption values reported in this study are lower than those reported
by Haccuria et al.,[53] where 2.33 kW h kg–1 was achieved in 2 h of electrochemical processing
for copper recovery at 40 °C from e-waste and also with static
electrodes, where the agitation of the system was promoted with a
magnetic stirring bar in order to improve the mass transport phenomena.
Therefore, it is noticeable that the use of the RCE electrochemical
reactor improves the process efficiency and reduces the operation
time when compared with static electrodes. In addition, it should
be highlighted that under these working conditions, the current efficiency
values are not too different when compared to values reported for
silver recovery by Arredondo et al.,[46] where
the current efficiency is up to 90% before the 95% of silver-ion recovery
is achieved in electrolysis time of 90 min in a RCE electrochemical
reactor.Using the data from Figure a, it is possible to evaluate the specific
mass-transfer coefficient
for copper ions at the RCE reactor by evaluating the parameters in eq for a simple batch reactor
and assuming a first-order kinetic reactionwhere c0and c are the copper concentrations
in mol cm–3, at time 0 and t, respectively; km is the mass transport coefficient in cm s–1, a is the specific surface area
in cm–1, and t is the electrolysis
time in s.[46]The graphical analysis
of eq , shown in Figure , suggests a specific
mass-transfer coefficient, ka, of 8.66 × 10–4 s–1, which is similar to 6.39 ×
10–5 s–1 reported by de Oca et
al.[42] for Cu(II) ions reduction onto a
304-type stainless-steel RCE in acidic media, 1.0 M H2SO4, and 15.7 mM Cu(II); which suggest that the process is mass
transport-controlled over the charge-transport phenomena. The mass
transport value calculated could be useful to determine the Sherwood
number (Sh) for subsequent scale up and optimization
of the process.
Figure 7
Logarithmic decay of the concentration of copper ions vs time. Electrolysis was in the RCE reactor at constant
potential
of −0.45 V vs SCE for the real leached solution from e-waste
[0.5 mol dm–3 HCl, 0.074 mol dm–3 FeCl3 and 1060 mg dm–3 Cu (16 ×
10–3 mol dm–3 Cu)] on a copper
cylinder of 120 cm2 geometric area exposed to the electrolyte
rotating at 50 rpm, Re number 15120.
Logarithmic decay of the concentration of copper ions vs time. Electrolysis was in the RCE reactor at constant
potential
of −0.45 V vs SCE for the real leached solution from e-waste
[0.5 mol dm–3 HCl, 0.074 mol dm–3 FeCl3 and 1060 mg dm–3 Cu (16 ×
10–3 mol dm–3 Cu)] on a copper
cylinder of 120 cm2 geometric area exposed to the electrolyte
rotating at 50 rpm, Re number 15120.Figure a
shows
the EDS results of the copper deposited. The main signals are related
to copper, which corresponds to a purity of 96 wt %. The lower signals
correspond to oxygen and chloride, which comes from the copper oxidation
after the process and from the electrolyte composition, respectively.
It is worth noting that the EDS result does not shows the presence
of impurities of Pb, Sb, and Fe in the leached solution. This suggests
that the methodology for purifying the electrolyte and choosing the
reactor operation potential were adequately established. Figure b,c shows the RCE
used in the electrochemical reactor before and after copper recovery,
respectively.
Figure 8
(a) EDS results of the Cu deposit; RCE (b) before the
Cu electrodeposition
process and (c) after the Cu electrodeposition process. (Photo taken
by the authors).
(a) EDS results of the Cu deposit; RCE (b) before the
Cu electrodeposition
process and (c) after the Cu electrodeposition process. (Photo taken
by the authors).
Conclusions
A process for the successful recovery of copper from e-waste by
using both hydrometallurgical and electrochemical techniques was developed.
A simple intermediate purification step, which allows the recovery
of antimony, through variation of pH, was presented. The electrochemical
characterization was the main objective to achieve copper recovery
and allowed establishing the parameters for the selective copper electrowinning
onto the RCE.The RCE configuration proves to be an efficient
technology for
metal-ion recovery from e-waste. The process achieved high-performance
parameters, reaching 73% in the total cathodic current efficiency
and 1.8 kW h kg–1 Cu for the specific energy consumption
after 2400 s. The specific mass-transport coefficient was evaluated
as well, reporting an efficient value of 8.66 × 10–4 s–1.The methodology proposed in this work
allows recovery of not only
metallic copper at high purity, but also an 81 wt % Sb2O3(s) salt, that is two commercially valuable products.
Authors: Ionela Birloaga; Ida De Michelis; Francesco Ferella; Mihai Buzatu; Francesco Vegliò Journal: Waste Manag Date: 2013-01-29 Impact factor: 7.145
Authors: Eleazar Salinas-Rodríguez; Juan Hernández-Ávila; Eduardo Cerecedo-Sáenz; Alberto Arenas-Flores; Maria A Veloz-Rodríguez; Norman Toro; Maria Del P Gutiérrez-Amador; Otilio A Acevedo-Sandoval Journal: Materials (Basel) Date: 2022-03-22 Impact factor: 3.623