| Literature DB >> 32548402 |
Juan Mercado-Pacheco1, Yuranis Julio-Altamiranda1, Eduardo Sánchez-Tuirán1, Ángel Dario González-Delgado2, Karina A Ojeda1.
Abstract
In this work, a combination of mechanical and chemical pretreatments using urea on corn residues (leaves and stems) was evaluated to obtain total reducing sugars (TRSs). The residues were characterized via high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to quantify biomass composition. During the mechanical pretreatment, the particle size of the biomass was reduced to 0.5, 1, and 2 mm. The chemical pretreatment was performed with urea solution at different concentrations (2, 5, and 10% w/v) and a fixed biomass-to-solvent ratio of 1:25 (g/mL) as well as stirring at 150 rpm for 20 h. The effect of temperature on the pretreatment results was evaluated by varying such operating variables in 30 and 50 °C. After both pretreatments, hydrolysis was carried out in an autoclave using sulfuric acid at 1% v/v at 121 °C for 1 h. The content of TRS was quantified using 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) method and biomass after pretreatment was characterized via Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR). For both leaves and stems, the HPLC technique reported the presence of 47.4 g of cellulose, 40.04 g of hemicellulose, and 26.38 g of lignin. It was found that the highest amount of TRS (36.50 g/L) was obtained with a urea concentration of 2% at 50 °C using a particle size of 0.5 mm. The production of TRS was significantly higher for pretreated biomass than that for raw corn residues, confirming the importance of both mechanical and chemical pretreatments to reach better delignification results.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32548402 PMCID: PMC7271402 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c00645
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Main Advantages and Disadvantages of Chemical Pretreatment with Urea
| noncorrosive compared with acids; less cellulose degradation than acids; low-cost nitrogen-release fertilizer with high nitrogen content; easy to dissolve in water and convert to gaseous ammonia; can be employed and transported at regular temperatures and pressure without extra equipment cost | Ojeda-Delgado et al.[ | |
| Wang et al.[ | ||
| Yu et al.[ | ||
| stronger smelling compared with solid acids; use of more chemicals than in hot water extraction; less safe than ethanol | Venturin et al.[ | |
| Yu et al.[ |
Chemical Composition of Raw Corn Biomass
| cellulose | hemicellulose | lignin | ash | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| composition (wt % dry biomass) | leaves | stems | leaves | stems | leaves | stems | leaves | stems |
| 19.1 ± 0.4 | 28.3 ± 0.1 | 19.5 ± 0.1 | 20.9 ± 0.3 | 13.3 ± 0.2 | 13.1 ± 0.2 | 12.8 ± 0.1 | 4.5 ± 0.1 | |
Effect of Size Reduction on the Production of TRS from Corn Biomass
| particle size (mm) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRS (g/L) | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | Raw |
| 20.1 ± 0.8 | 20.6 ± 0.7 | 21.4 ± 0.9 | 18.3 ± 0.4 | |
Total Reducing Sugar Production from Pretreated and Hydrolyzed Biomass at 50 °C
| reducing sugars after pretreatment (g/L) | reducing sugars after hydrolysis (g/L) | total reducing sugars (g/L) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| particle size (mm) | S2% | S5% | S10% | S2% | S5% | S10% | S2% | S5% | S10% |
| 0.5 | 3.4 | 4.2 | 6.4 | 33.1 | 26.5 | 20.7 | 36.5 | 30.8 | 27.2 |
| 1 | 3.4 | 4.1 | 6.9 | 30.8 | 23.6 | 22.2 | 34.2 | 27.79 | 29.2 |
| 2 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 5 | 29.4 | 25.4 | 21.3 | 32.6 | 28.6 | 26.4 |
| raw | 2.7 | 3.2 | 5.1 | 29.4 | 25.3 | 15.2 | 32.2 | 28.5 | 20.3 |
| standard deviation | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 3.2 | 1.9 | 1.3 | 3.8 |
Total Reducing Sugar Production from Pretreated and Hydrolyzed Biomass at 30 ° C
| reducing sugars after pretreatment (g/L) | reducing sugars after hydrolysis (g/L) | total reducing sugars (g/L) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| particle size (mm) | S2% | S5% | S2% | S5% | S2% | S5% |
| 0.5 | 2.9 | 2.4 | 27 | 25 | 30 | 27.5 |
| 1 | 3.3 | 2.8 | 26.2 | 23.5 | 29.5 | 26.4 |
| 2 | 2.8 | 2.2 | 27.9 | 26.2 | 30.8 | 28.5 |
| raw | 2.5 | 2.1 | 26.9 | 19.5 | 29.4 | 21.7 |
| standard deviation | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 2.9 | 0.6 | 3.0 |
Comparison of Operating Conditions for the Biomass Pretreatment in the Present Study with Those in Previous Works
| conditions | Wang et al.[ | Ojeda et
al.[ | Julio-Altamiranda
et al.[ | this work |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| raw material | corn stover | corn leaves and stems | empty fruit bunches and kernel shells | corn leaves and stems |
| urea concentration (% w/v) | 97 | 5 | 4–6 | 2 |
| temperature (°C) | 80 | 80 | 80 | 50 |
| biomass/urea solution ratio (g/mL) | 1:1 | 1:25 | 1:25 | 1:25 |
Figure 1FT-IR spectra of the S2% sample (2% w/v urea solution, 0.5 mm particle size, and 50 °C).
Figure 2FT-IR spectra of the S10% sample (10% w/v urea solution, 2 mm particle size, and 50 °C).