| Literature DB >> 32548233 |
Anna Brydsten1,2, Agneta Cederström1, Mikael Rostila1.
Abstract
•Experiencing early employment disadvantage could lead to long-term labour market instability and labour market exclusion.•Migrants showed more turbulent transitions between labour market states than natives.•Belonging to a turbulent labour market trajectory is association with poor mental ill health in mid-life.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32548233 PMCID: PMC7284057 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100600
Source DB: PubMed Journal: SSM Popul Health ISSN: 2352-8273
Descriptive characteristics of the study population, stratified by women and men.
| Women (n = 48044) | Men (n = 50590) | pa | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n = | % | n = | % | |||
| Sweden | 36794 | 76.6 | 38749 | 76.6 | 0.53 | |
| Second generation | 6348 | 13.2 | 6717 | 13.3 | ||
| European countries | 1822 | 3.8 | 1975 | 3.9 | ||
| Non-European countries | 3080 | 6.4 | 3149 | 6.2 | ||
| Employed | 9.7 | (0.02) | 11.9 | (0.02) | 0.91 | |
| Unemployed | 0.9 | (0.01) | 1.0 | (0.01) | ||
| Student | 4.0 | (0.02) | 2.9 | (0.01) | ||
| Parental leave | 1.4 | (0.01) | 0.1 | (<0.01) | ||
| Sick-leave | 0.3 | (0.01) | 0.2 | (<0.01) | ||
| NEETa | 1.3 | (0.01) | 1.4 | (0.01) | ||
| High | 12776 | 26.6 | 13573 | 26.8 | 0.85 | |
| Medium | 22021 | 45.8 | 23079 | 45.6 | ||
| Low | 11534 | 24.0 | 12145 | 24.0 | ||
| Unknown | 1713 | 3.6 | 1793 | 3.5 | ||
| Married | 32656 | 68.0 | 34692 | 68.6 | 0.04 | |
| Single/Other | 15388 | 32.0 | 15898 | 31.4 | ||
| No | 43483 | 90.5 | 45806 | 90.5 | 0.85 | |
| Yes | 4561 | 9.5 | 4784 | 9.5 | ||
| No | 46434 | 96.6 | 49259 | 97.4 | <0.01 | |
| Yes | 1610 | 3.4 | 1331 | 2.6 | ||
| No | 46604 | 97.0 | 49284 | 97.4 | <0.01 | |
| Yes | 1440 | 3.0 | 1306 | 2.6 | ||
aDenotes a p-value between women and men.
bNot having an income from education, employment or training (NEET).
Fig. 1Density plots of men's state sequences of labour market positions across the life course (age 20–37) clustered in four groups.
Fig. 2Density plots of women's state sequences of labour market positions across the life course (age 20–37) clustered in four groups.
Cluster membership based on region of origin, for men and women respectively (%, reported within cluster).
| Early labour market entry | Late labour market entry | Continuously unstable position | Long-term difficulties | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 33.0 | 49.2 | 13.2 | 4.50 |
| Second generation | 32.1 | 40.8 | 18.8 | 8.22 |
| European countries | 24.5 | 35.0 | 29.7 | 10.8 |
| Non-European countries | 23.3 | 31.1 | 35.2 | 10.3 |
| Sweden | 54.3 | 34.8 | 7.3 | 3.7 |
| Second generation | 50.0 | 31.2 | 12.5 | 6.3 |
| European countries | 40.6 | 29.9 | 21.4 | 8.1 |
| Non-European countries | 32.7 | 26.7 | 32.7 | 7.9 |
Mean time spent in labour market position for women and men across region of origin
| Employed | Unemployed | Student | Parental leave | Sick-leave | Other | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | (S.E.) | Mean | (S.E.) | Mean | (S.E.) | Mean | (S.E.) | Mean | (S.E.) | Mean | (S.E.) | |
| Sweden | 10.07 | (0.02) | 0.81 | (0.01) | 4.02 | (0.02) | 1.39 | (0.01) | 0.3 | (0.01) | 1.05 | (0.01) |
| Second generation | 9.08 | (0.06) | 1.06 | (0.02) | 3.89 | (0.04) | 1.29 | (0.02) | 0.37 | (0.01) | 1.67 | (0.04) |
| European countries | 7.56 | (0.11) | 1.32 | (0.05) | 3.83 | (0.08) | 1.25 | (0.03) | (0.33 | (0.02) | 2.23 | (0.08) |
| Non-European countries | 7.05 | (0.09) | 1.35 | (0.04) | 3.84 | (0.06) | 1.18 | (0.07) | 0.27 | (0.02) | 2.35 | (0.06) |
| Sweden | 12.51 | (0.02) | 0.88 | (0.01) | 2.87 | (0.02) | 0.05 | (<0.01) | 0.13 | (<0.01) | 1.23 | (0.01) |
| Second generation | 11.14 | (0.07) | 1.26 | (0.02) | 2.86 | (0.04) | 0.05 | (<0.01) | 0.19 | (0.01) | 1.94 | (0.04) |
| European countries | 9.42 | (0.12) | 1.61 | (0.05) | 2.98 | (0.07) | 0.06 | (0.01) | 0.21 | (0.02) | 2.32 | (0.08) |
| Non-European countries | 8.23 | (0.10) | 1.63 | (0.04) | 3.1 | (0.06) | 0.06 | (0.01) | 0.17 | (0.01) | 2.45 | (0.06) |
Fig. 1APredicted precarity across gender, region of origin and socioeconomic background
Average marginal effects (AME) of cluster membership and mental ill health in mid-life (age 38) and cluster trajectories, calculated from logistic regression results.
| Women | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AME (S.E.) | AME (S.E.) | AME (S.E.) | ||
| T1 | Ref | Ref | Ref | |
| T2 | −0.01 *** (<0.01) | −0.01 ** (0.01) | 0.00 (<0.01) | |
| T3 | 0.11 *** (0.01) | 0.11 *** (0.01) | 0.11 *** (0.01) | |
| T4 | 0.20 *** (0.01) | 0.20 *** (0.01) | 0.18 *** (0.01) | |
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||
| AME (S.E.) | AME (S.E.) | AME (S.E.) | ||
| T1 | Ref | Ref | Ref | |
| T2 | 0.00 (<0.01) | 0.13 *** (0.01) | 0.25 *** (0.01) | |
| T3 | 0.00 (<0.01) | 0.13 *** (0.01) | 0.25 *** (0.01) | |
| T4 | 0.01 (<0.01) | 0.13 *** (0.01) | 0.21 *** (0.01) | |
Model 1: Bivariate. Model 2: Adjusted for origin of birth. Model 3: Adjusted for model 2 and early-life course factors including parental socioeconomic position, own and parental mental health in childhood and parental marital status.