| Literature DB >> 32547917 |
Georgiana Deak1, Călin Mircea Gherman1, Angela Monica Ionică2, Áron Péter1, D Attila Sándor1,3, Andrei Daniel Mihalca1.
Abstract
To understand the importance of host' habitat choice in determining parasite burden, we studied the distribution of two helminth parasites of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) in south-eastern Europe (Romania): Crenosoma vulpis and Eucoleus aerophilus, both widely distributed respiratory nematodes parasitic in various carnivores. Even though the life cycle and biology of the two nematodes follow a different pattern, both parasites appear to be co-distributed and often co-infect foxes with variable prevalences across their range. Between July 2016 and August 2018, 550 red foxes, V. vulpes were collected by hunters in different localities from 22 counties of Romania and examined by necropsy. All parasites found in the trachea and bronchial system were collected and preserved in 70% ethanol. We characterised red fox/parasite habitats using seven predictors (fragmentation, altitude, presence/absence of water surface, per cent cover of arable land/grassland/urbanized areas/forest cover/wetlands). Prevalence, abundance, intensity, and sex ratio were calculated and statistically analysed using the R software. Out of the 550 examined foxes, 76.2% were infected with lungworms. The overall prevalence was 32.0% for C. vulpis and 72.5% for E. aerophilus. The mean intensity of infection was 13.70 for C. vulpis 6.15 for E. aerophilus. For both nematodes, the prevalence was significantly higher in males than in females, and there was no influence of hosts' age. No statistical differences were found for intensity and mean intensity in the case of infection with C. vulpis and E. aerophilus between age and sex categories. The abundance of C. vulpis showed a strong positive relationship with the presence of wetlands and habitat fragmentation. We found a significant correlation between the abundance of E. aerophilus and altitude, with foxes from higher elevations showing higher prevalences.Entities:
Keywords: Crenosoma vulpis; Eucoleus aerophilus; Nematodes; Romania; Vulpes vulpes
Year: 2020 PMID: 32547917 PMCID: PMC7286923 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2020.05.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl ISSN: 2213-2244 Impact factor: 2.674
Fig. 1Distribution of Crenosoma vulpis and Eucoleus aerophilus in Romania.
Correspondence between CORINE LandCover categories and land-use types used in this study.
| Code Level 3 | Label Level3 | Assigned land-use type |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous urban fabric | Urban | |
| Discontinuous urban fabric | Urban | |
| Industrial or commercial units | Urban | |
| Road and rail networks and associated land | Urban | |
| Port areas | Urban | |
| Airports | Urban | |
| Mineral extraction sites | Urban | |
| Dump sites | Urban | |
| Construction sites | Urban | |
| Green urban areas | Urban | |
| Sport and leisure facilities | Urban | |
| Non-irrigated arable land | Arable | |
| Permanently irrigated land | Arable | |
| Rice fields | Arable | |
| Vineyards | Arable | |
| Fruit trees and berry plantations | Arable | |
| Olive groves | Arable | |
| Pastures | Grassland | |
| Annual crops associated with permanent crops | Arable | |
| Complex cultivation patterns | Arable | |
| Land principally occupied by agriculture, with significant areas of natural vegetation | Grassland | |
| Agro-forestry areas | Forest | |
| Broad-leaved forest | Forest | |
| Coniferous forest | Forest | |
| Mixed forest | Forest | |
| Natural grasslands | Grassland | |
| Moors and heathland | Grassland | |
| Sclerophyllous vegetation | Grassland | |
| Transitional woodland-shrub | Forest | |
| Sparsely vegetated areas | Grassland |
Prevalence of Crenosoma vulpis and Eucoleus aerophilus in red foxes from Romania.
| Category | Examined | Negative | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 550 | 131 | 176 | 399 | 20 | 243 | 156 | |
| (23.8%) | (32.0%) | (72.5%) | (3.6%) | (44.2%) | (28.4%) | ||
| 315 | 60 | 115 | 244 | 11 | 140 | 104 | |
| (19.0%) | (36.5%) | (77.5%) | (3.5%) | (44.4%) | (33.0%) | ||
| 235 | 71 | 61 | 155 | 9 | 9 | 52 | |
| (30.2%) | (26.0%) | (66.0%) | (3.8%) | (3.8%) | (22.1%) | ||
| 180 | 37 | 68 | 134 | 9 | 75 | 59 | |
| (20.6%) | (37.8%) | (74.4%) | (5.0%) | (42.7%) | (32.8%) | ||
| 370 | 94 | 108 | 265 | 11 | 168 | 97 | |
| (25.4%) | (29.2%) | (71.6%) | (3.0%) | (45.4%) | (26.2%) |
Intensity of Crenosoma vulpis in red foxes from Romania and its statistical interpretation (calculated for 168 foxes out the 176 infected ones).
| Fox category | Male nematodes | Female nematodes | Total | M:F ratio | Min | Median | Max | Mean intensity ± STDEV | H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 411 | 1303 | 1714 | 1:3.17 | 1 | 2 | 265 | 15.58 ± 32.09 | 3.27; n.s. | |
| Female | 165 | 424 | 589 | 1:2.57 | 1 | 2 | 87 | 10.16 ± 17.28 | ||
| Young | 337 | 919 | 1256 | 1:2.73 | 1 | 5 | 265 | 19.03 ± 38.80 | 2.35, n.s. | |
| Adult | 239 | 808 | 1047 | 1:3.38 | 1 | 3 | 115 | 10.26 ± 17.07 | ||
Significance levels: n.s. = not significant.
Intensity of Eucoleus aerophilus in red foxes from Romania and its statistical interpretation (calculated for 378 foxes out the 399 infected ones).
| Fox category | Male nematodes | Female nematodes | Total | M:F ratio | Min | Median | Max | Mean intensity ± STDEV | H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 338 | 1255 | 1593 | 1:3.71 | 1 | 3.5 | 24 | 4.94 ± 4.37 | 3.82; | |
| Female | 154 | 578 | 732 | 1:3.75 | 1 | 4 | 51 | 6.93 ± 7.51 | ||
| Young | 186 | 632 | 818 | 1:3.40 | 1 | 4 | 28 | 6.29 ± 5.98 | 0.36; n.s. | |
| Adult | 306 | 1201 | 1507 | 1:3.92 | 1 | 4 | 51 | 6.08 ± 6.81 | ||
Significance levels: p < ‘*’ 0.05, n.s. = not significant.
Prevalence of Crenosoma vulpis by sex and age of foxes (n = 550 foxes; 176 infected);32%; 95% CI = 28.24–36.01%) and its statistical interpretation.
| Fox category | % | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 36.51 | 31.38–41.96 | 6.40; | |
| Female | 25.96 | 20.48–32.06 | ||
| Young | 37.78 | 30.67–45.29 | 3.72; 0.053 | |
| Adult | 29.19 | 24.79–34.02 | ||
Significance levels: p < ‘**’ 0.01.
Prevalence of Eucoleus aerophilus by sex and age of foxes (n = 550 foxes; 399 infected; 72.55%; 95% CI = 68.67–76.11%) and its statistical interpretation.
| Fox category | % | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 77.46 | 72.53–81.73 | 8.373; | |
| Female | 65.96 | 59.51–71.99 | ||
| Young | 74.44 | 67.42–80.64 | 0.353; n.s. | |
| Adult | 71.62 | 66.82–75.97 | ||
Significance levels: p < ‘**’ 0.01, n.s. = not significant.
Statistical analysis of co-infection rates of foxes with C. vulpis and E. aerophilus.
| Fox category | % | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 33.02 | 28.05–38.39 | 7.33; | |
| Female | 22.13 | 16.99–27.98 | ||
| Young | 32.78 | 25.98–40.15 | 2.25; n.s. | |
| Adult | 26.22 | 22.00–30.93 | ||
Significance levels: p < ‘**’ 0.01, n.s. = not significant.
Effect of environmental predictors (relative area of land-use categories, altitude and fragmentation inside 400 ha sample plots) on the abundance of the nematode Crenosoma vulpis in red foxes from Romania.
| Estimate | Std. Error | z value | Sign | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Intercept) | 280.0388 | 59.9906 | 4.668 | ||
| Arable | −367.1515 | 80.5074 | −4.560 | *** | |
| Forest | −512.0818 | 116.1698 | −4.408 | *** | |
| Grassland | −285.7888 | 61.5950 | −4.640 | *** | |
| Urban | 0.1270 | 2.3779 | 0.053 | ||
| Wetlands | 167.8188 | 85.8575 | 4.440 | *** | |
| Altitude | 0.2429 | 0.2318 | 1.048 | ||
| Fragmentation | 84.6652 | 15.8377 | 5.346 | *** | |
Significance levels: p < ‘***’ 0.001, ‘**’ 0.01, ‘*’ 0.05.