| Literature DB >> 32547726 |
Anucha Muenthaisong1, Boondarika Nambooppha1, Amarin Rittipornlertrak1, Pallop Tankaew2, Thanya Varinrak2, Korkiat Muangthai3, Kheemchompu Atthikanyaphak3, Takuo Sawada4, Nattawooti Sthitmatee1,5.
Abstract
Hemorrhagic septicemia (HS) is an important infectious disease in cattle and buffaloes, caused by Pasteurella multocida B:2 and E:2. The intranasal recombinant OmpH-based vaccine was successfully used to protect dairy cattle from HS in a previous study. Thus, this study aimed to examine the protective ability of that vaccine among buffaloes. Four groups of Thai swamp buffaloes received different vaccines and were labeled as 100 or 200 μg of the rOmpH with CpG-ODN2007, commercial HS bacterin vaccine, and nonvaccinated control groups. Sera and whole blood were collected to examine the antibody levels and cellular immune response using indirect ELISA and MTT assay, respectively. Challenge exposure was performed with virulent P. multocida strain M-1404 serotype B:2 on day 72 of the experiment. The antibody titers to P. multocida among immunized buffaloes were significantly higher than in the control group (p < 0.01), especially the 200 μg of the rOmpH group. The stimulation index (SI) of the intranasally vaccinated groups revealed significantly higher levels than the nonvaccinated group (p < 0.01), but not different from the intramuscularly commercial HS vaccine. The clinical signs and high fever were observed after challenge exposure in the nonvaccinated group, while it was not observed among the 200 μg of rOmpH immunized buffaloes. The other immunized groups showed partial protection with transient fever. In conclusion, the rOmpH-based intranasal vaccine could elicit protective ability and induce antibody- and cell-mediated immune response against virulent P. multocida strain among swamp buffaloes.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32547726 PMCID: PMC7271248 DOI: 10.1155/2020/3548973
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Med Int ISSN: 2042-0048
Vaccine formulations, number of immunizations, and protection in buffaloes.
| Group | Vaccine formulations | No. of immunizations | Inoculum strainc | No. of buffaloes without clinical sign/total (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 100 | 6 | M-1404 | 4/6 (66.67) |
| 2 | 200 | 6 | 6/6 (100) | |
| 3 | Commercial haemorrhagic septicemia vaccineb | 6 | 5/6 (83.33) | |
| 4 | No vaccination | 6 | 0/6 (0)d |
aIntranasal administration with 1.0 ml/dose. bIntramuscular administration with 1.0 ml/dose. cChallenge inoculum was 1 ml of PBS containing approximately 103 CFU/ml. dThis group was terminated due to the clinical signs of buffaloes.
Figure 1Serum IgG profile of buffalo immunized with different vaccine formulations against rOmpH of P. multocida strain M-1404 by indirect ELISA. Asterisk (∗) represents the significant differentiation of antibody IgG level compared to the nonvaccinated control group (p < 0.01).
Figure 2Stimulation index (SI) of buffalo PBMCs immunized with different vaccine formulations against Con A and rOmpH of P. multocida strain M-1404 antigen. Asterisk (∗) represents the significant differentiation of SI value compared to the nonvaccinated control group (p < 0.01).