Literature DB >> 32547631

The value and practical utility of intraoperative touch imprint cytology of sentinel lymph node(s) in patients with breast cancer: A retrospective cytology-histology correlation study.

Yuji Uno1, Naoko Akiyama1, Sayaka Yuzawa1, Masahiro Kitada2, Hidehiro Takei1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Intraoperative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) for patients with breast cancer is widely performed with frozen section (FS), cytology, or a combination of both. Touch imprint cytology (TIC) reportedly has an equivalent sensitivity to FS. We studied its diagnostic utility to detect SLN metastases.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cases of 367 patients with breast cancer who underwent intraoperative valuation of SLNs (507 LNs) were evaluated. All FS and corresponding TIC slides of SLNs of each case were reviewed microscopically for the presence of metastases of any size. If present, the metastatic focus was measured on the FS.
RESULTS: Of these 507 SLNs, 82 LNs (16.2%) from 69 women were found to have metastases in the FS and consisted of 5 LNs of isolated tumor cells, 15 of micrometastasis, and 62 of macrometastasis. TIC identified metastases in 69 of these 82 SLNs (sensitivity: 84.1%, specificity: 100%, and accuracy: 97.4%). All macrometastases could be detected by TIC, whereas TIC identified approximately 50% of micrometastases and none of isolated tumor cells. The size detection limit of metastatic foci, defined as the smallest dimension of metastasis detected without false negatives, was 2 mm. The smallest metastatic focus identified was 0.8 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: TIC of SLNs is of great use given its negative predictive value of 100% for identification of macrometastasis in our study. For intraoperative evaluation of SLNs, based on our data, a practical two-step approach is proposed: SLN evaluation should be initially performed by TIC and then proceed to FS histological analysis only when cytologically positive to determine the size of metastatic focus. ©2020 Cytopathology Foundation Inc, Published by Scientific Scholar.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Frozen section; Sentinel lymph node; Tough imprint cytology

Year:  2020        PMID: 32547631      PMCID: PMC7294180          DOI: 10.25259/Cytojournal_80_2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytojournal        ISSN: 1742-6413            Impact factor:   2.091


  16 in total

1.  The use of touch preparation for the evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer.

Authors:  Julie A Guidroz; Matthew T Johnson; Carol E H Scott-Conner; Barry R De Young; Ronald J Weigel
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  The value of touch imprint cytology and frozen section for intra-operative evaluation of axillary sentinel lymph nodes.

Authors:  Bahram Memar; Ramin Sadeghi; Narjes-Khatoon Ayati; Seyed Amir Aledavood; Ali Tghizadeh; Shahram Naseri; Mohammad Naser Forghani; Fatemeh Homaee; Ali Abdollahi
Journal:  Pol J Pathol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.072

3.  Do all patients with sentinel node metastasis from breast carcinoma need complete axillary node dissection?

Authors:  K U Chu; R R Turner; N M Hansen; M B Brennan; A Bilchik; A E Giuliano
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Sentinel-lymph-node resection compared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer: overall survival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial.

Authors:  David N Krag; Stewart J Anderson; Thomas B Julian; Ann M Brown; Seth P Harlow; Joseph P Costantino; Takamaru Ashikaga; Donald L Weaver; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Lynne M Jalovec; Thomas G Frazier; R Dirk Noyes; André Robidoux; Hugh Mc Scarth; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Measuring the impact of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial on breast cancer surgery in a community health system.

Authors:  Gerald Paul Wright; Megan E Mater; Holly L Sobel; Gregory M Knoll; Leon D Oostendorp; Marianne K Melnik; Mathew H Chung
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  The evaluation and optimization of intraoperative touch imprint cytology for sentinel lymph nodes in early-stage breast cancer in China.

Authors:  Jia-Jian Chen; Ben-Long Yang; Jia-Xin Zhang; Wei-Ping Xu; Zhi-Min Shao; Jiong Wu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Armando E Giuliano; Kelly K Hunt; Karla V Ballman; Peter D Beitsch; Pat W Whitworth; Peter W Blumencranz; A Marilyn Leitch; Sukamal Saha; Linda M McCall; Monica Morrow
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Intraoperative imprint cytologic evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes for lobular carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  Andrew J Creager; Kim R Geisinger; Nancy D Perrier; Perry Shen; Jo Ann Shaw; Peter R Young; Doug Case; Edward A Levine
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Use of a new adhesive film for the preparation of multi-purpose fresh-frozen sections from hard tissues, whole-animals, insects and plants.

Authors:  Tadafumi Kawamoto
Journal:  Arch Histol Cytol       Date:  2003-05

Review 10.  Sentinel lymph nodes for breast carcinoma: an update on current practice.

Authors:  Aoife Maguire; Edi Brogi
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.087

View more
  1 in total

1.  Thematic trends and knowledge structure map of sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer: a bibliometric analysis from 2010 to 2019.

Authors:  Yujie Huo; Ting Fan; Si Chen; Qiannan Liu; Yue Fang; Fan Yao
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 0.496

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.