Literature DB >> 32547249

Management of Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD) During Pregnancy: Risks and Challenges.

Lucy McBride1, Catherine Wilkinson2, Shilpanjali Jesudason2,3.   

Abstract

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) affects up to 1 in 1000 people. The disease is characterized by the progressive development of cysts throughout the renal parenchyma due to inherited pathogenic variants in genes including PKD1 or PKD2 and eventually leads to gradual loss of renal function, along with manifestations in other organ systems such as hepatic cysts and intracranial aneurysms. ADPKD management has advanced considerably in recent years due to genetic testing availability, pre-implantation genetic diagnosis technology and new therapeutic agents. Renal disease in pregnancy is recognised as an important risk factor for adverse maternal and fetal outcome. Women with ADPKD and health professionals face multiple challenges in optimising outcomes during the pre-pregnancy, pregnancy and post-partum periods.
© 2020 McBride et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease; chronic kidney disease; cystic kidney disease; pregnancy

Year:  2020        PMID: 32547249      PMCID: PMC7261500          DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S204997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Womens Health        ISSN: 1179-1411


Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common form of monogenic kidney disease and cystic kidney disease, affecting around one in 1000 to one in 2500 individuals.1,2 Males and females are equally affected. The disease is characterised by the development of cysts throughout the renal parenchyma from early in life leading to progressive loss of renal function in many patients. ADPKD accounts for 5–10% of the patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD),3,4 usually occurring around the sixth decade. Hypertension is common, affecting most people with enlarged kidneys or biomedical features of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Complications as a result of cystic formation and growth include pain, cyst hemorrhage and hematuria, urinary tract infection (UTI), cyst infection, and nephrolithiasis. Although renal consequences predominate, extra-renal disease occurs, including polycystic liver disease, intracranial aneurysm and cardiac disease. ADPKD is caused by pathologic variants in PKD1 and PKD2 genes. PKD1, located on chromosome 16, encodes Polycystin-1 (PC1) and PKD2, located on chromosome 4, encodes polycystin-2 (PC2). The polycystins are a subfamily of protein channels that regulate intracellular calcium signalling. Polycystins are expressed in multiple tissues, including renal tubular epithelium, hepatic bile ducts and pancreatic ducts. Both PC1 and PC2 are found on the primary cilia. More than 1500 different pathogenic variants of PKD1 and PKD2 have been identified and indexed on the ADPKD mutation database.5 Mutations in PKD1 versus PKD2 generally lead to more severe disease, with an earlier average age of ESKD.6 A proportion of people with ADPKD will not have a family history of the disease due to de novo mutations (5–10%), mosaicism, or undiagnosed milder disease from certain mutations in family members. ADPKD has high phenotypic variability. All affected people develop cysts but with variable occurrence and progression of renal insufficiency. In addition to the affected locus, other genetic factors impact phenotype, and affected families may have significantly discordant disease severity, suggesting a role for environmental factors.6,7 Clinical factors have been associated with disease severity and outcomes, such as total kidney volume (TKV), blood pressure, renal function and intracranial aneurysm/haemorrhage.

Chronic Kidney Disease

CKD is an abnormality in kidney structure or function, present for greater than 3 months. CKD is classified into stages from 1 to 5, which indicate likelihood to develop complications related to CKD including progression to ESKD, anemia, adverse reactions to renally excreted drugs, cardiovascular events and all-cause death. Classification (illustrated in Figure 1) takes into account glomerular filtration rate and degree of albuminuria.8,9
Figure 1

Prognosis of CKD by GFR and Albuminuria Categories.

Notes: Green indicates low risk, yellow indicates moderate risk, orange indicates high risk, red indicates very high risk. Image reproduced with permission from NKF KDOGI Guidelines 2012. Available from 8

Abbreviations: CKD, chronic kidney disease; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; KDIGO, Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes.

By definition, all patients with ADPKD have at least CKD stage 1 given the abnormality in kidney structure. In Australia, an estimation of glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is calculated by using the CKD-EPI equation.10 This formula uses variables of patient age, gender and creatinine; is easily calculated; and is now mandatory to report with biochemistry. The eGFR is only valid for people over 18 years of age and is not validated for use in pregnancy.

ADPKD and Women of Child-Bearing Age

As most (>80%) ADPKD patients are commenced on dialysis over the age of 45 years,4 ADPKD is uncommonly seen in Australian women who receive dialysis or have a kidney transplant in pregnancy.11,12 However, women with ADPKD may have earlier-stage CKD during pregnancy with hypertension, proteinuria, and mild renal impairment. Discussions regarding pregnancy should be a routine part of clinical care for all women with CKD of child-bearing age.13 All chronic kidney diseases, including ADPKD, are known to be associated with higher risk pregnancies, particularly preeclampsia and prematurity. Assessment of renal function, proteinuria, and blood pressure is essential in individualising risk assessment. Consider renal ultrasound if not done within 1 year to assess cyst's size and to use as a baseline scan for comparison in pregnancy. Contraception also allows adequate planning and timing of pregnancy to optimise maternal and fetal outcomes (see Figure 2) and should be considered as a part of routine care.
Figure 2

Algorithm for Pregnancy Management in Women with ADPKD.

Abbreviations: ADPKD, autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease; PGD, pre-implantation genetic diagnosis; BP, blood pressure; UTI, urinary tract infection; ACEi, angiotensin-converting enzyme; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; ICA, intra-cranial aneurysm; TKV, total kidney volume.

Prognosis of CKD by GFR and Albuminuria Categories. Notes: Green indicates low risk, yellow indicates moderate risk, orange indicates high risk, red indicates very high risk. Image reproduced with permission from NKF KDOGI Guidelines 2012. Available from 8 Abbreviations: CKD, chronic kidney disease; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; KDIGO, Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes. Algorithm for Pregnancy Management in Women with ADPKD. Abbreviations: ADPKD, autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease; PGD, pre-implantation genetic diagnosis; BP, blood pressure; UTI, urinary tract infection; ACEi, angiotensin-converting enzyme; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; ICA, intra-cranial aneurysm; TKV, total kidney volume.

ADPKD and Fertility

There is no evidence of impaired female fertility in ADPKD if renal function is normal.14 Some studies have reported an increased rate of ectopic pregnancy however numbers are small.15,16 Small studies report multiple abnormalities in males with ADPKD with regard to fertility, including necrospermia, ultrastructural flagellar defects, immotile sperm, seminal vesicle cysts and ejaculatory duct cysts. However, it is unknown how frequent the association between infertility and ADPKD is, and larger studies are required.14

General Management of ADPKD

Management of early stages of ADPKD and CKD generally is discussed in more detail elsewhere.17 The management of many aspects of ADPKD including genetic testing, cyst pain, and non-renal manifestations is also outlined in the Kidney Health Australia Caring for Australians with Renal Impairment (KHA-CARI) Guidelines.18 In brief, it is recommended that people maintain a healthy weight, regular exercise, and consume a moderate protein, sodium-restricted diet. Smoking avoidance or cessation and appropriate monitoring for hypertension and other cardiovascular risk factors are also important, with treatment as necessary.19 First-line treatment of hypertension is with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi), and if intolerant with angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB), with additional agents added as necessary to maintain blood pressure to individualised targets.20 Management of hypertension during pregnancy is discussed in greater detail below. Tolvaptan is a new therapy approved for ADPKD, providing additional treatment options for some patients, usually under strict selection criteria; however, it is not available in all countries as yet. Tolvaptan is an antagonist of the vasopressin V2 receptor. Cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) stimulates cyst epithelial cell proliferation and fluid secretion by these epithelial cells. cAMP is increased in ADPKD renal tissues and is produced by vasopressin-mediated activation of adenyl cyclase.21 Tolvaptan works by inhibiting vasopressin-stimulated cAMP production, thereby inhibiting fluid secretion and cell proliferation.22–24 The CRISP trial25 showed that TKV as measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was associated with reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and progression to ESKD. TKV >600 mL/m predicts GFR decline within the next 8 years with 75% sensitivity and specificity. Tolvaptan, therefore, may be of therapeutic benefit to slow or halt progression to ESKD.25 The key trials (TEMPO 3:4,22 REPRISE24 and TEMPO 4:423) demonstrated reduction of cyst growth and reduced rate of loss of GFR over time. The current Pharmaceutical Benefit Scheme indications in Australia for tolvaptan are for use in adult patients with ADPKD with eGFR between 30–89mL/min/1.73m2 with rapidly decreasing eGFR (>5mL/min/1.73m2/year). Regarding use in pregnancy, animal data show embryo-fetal toxicity at low exposure and it has been shown to cross easily into breastmilk.26 Safety in human pregnancy or infant and child populations has not been studied. Therefore, tolvaptan is classified as pregnancy category D and is recommended to be avoided in pregnancy and breastfeeding. Impact on fertility is unknown.

Physiologic Changes of Pregnancy

During pregnancy, maternal systemic vascular resistance decreases, reducing afterload and increasing cardiac output. The kidneys increase in size and the urinary collecting system dilates. Vasodilation results in glomerular hyperfiltration and an increase in glomerular filtration rate with a concomitant fall in serum creatinine. There are changes to tubular function, with some increase in non-albumin urinary protein excretion and reduction in tubular glucose reabsorption. There is an increase in total body sodium and potassium associated with increase in plasma volume throughout pregnancy.27 Estimated GFR calculations are invalid and renal function is best measured with serum creatinine, noting that the reference range is lower than for non-pregnant women.

CKD and Pregnancy

It is estimated that 0.3–3% of the pregnancies are complicated by CKD28,29 including both women with known CKD entering pregnancy and women being diagnosed with CKD in pregnancy. Although previous generations of women with CKD were discouraged from pursuing pregnancy due to reports of poor outcomes,30 greater awareness around risks with appropriate monitoring and improvements in maternal-fetal care means more women are pursuing pregnancy successfully across the spectrum of disease severity.31

Adverse Pregnancy-Related Outcomes in CKD

Multiple review papers have discussed the adverse pregnancy-related outcomes associated with CKD.13,31,32 The key risk factors are CKD stage preconception, proteinuria and hypertension. Worsening CKD is associated with increased risk, both in severity and incidence, of adverse pregnancy-related outcomes, with the greatest risk of adverse outcomes seen in the dialysis population.32,33 Women with CKD are at greater risk of developing decline in renal function, hypertension, proteinuria and preeclampsia29,31,33-35 in pregnancy. This increased risk is also seen in women with ADPKD.15,36 Obstetric outcomes of induction of labour and Caesarean section are also more common in CKD populations.29 This increased risk includes in women with “normal” renal function, or CKD stage 1, even in the absence of hypertension and proteinuria.33,35 This is demonstrated in the increased relative risk of preeclampsia, pregnancy-induced hypertension and preterm delivery in otherwise well women undertaking pregnancy after kidney donation.37–39 This is particularly relevant to the ADPKD population, as most women with ADPKD may be entirely asymptomatic; however, given their structural renal disease and CKD stage 1, they are at increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes and warrant additional pregnancy care. Fetal risks, particularly lower birth weight, small for gestation age (SGA), prematurity, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), and stillbirth are increased, with higher risk associated with increasingly severe CKD stage.29,33,40 There may be an increased risk of fetal malformation with moderate-severe CKD, but no association has been found with earlier-stage disease.41 Maternal and fetal risks are increased with multiple pregnancies.42 Certain conditions such as immunological renal disease, systemic lupus erythematosus and vesicoureteric reflux have been shown to have worse pregnancy outcomes compared with other types of kidney disorders; however, this has not been particularly noted with ADPKD.29

Patient Perspectives and Shared Decision-Making in Pregnancy Counselling

Previous research has described multiple themes in relation to patient perspectives on CKD and pregnancy,43 including bodily failure, devastating loss and guilt at not achieving motherhood or gambling with maternal health. There are complex decisions when considering pregnancy, relating to women’s own health and survival, outcomes for their future offspring, including inheritance of genetic disease, and expectations of partners and families. Health professionals’ attitudes can lead to feelings of medical judgement and lack of support. Discussing the medical risks of pregnancy early in the disease course allows informed shared decision-making for pregnancy planning. Information provided needs to be well informed, up to date, and specific to women’s health/disease status. The challenge for the health professional is to balance discussion of medical risks sensitively with patients' values of hope, autonomy and family. Disengagement of the patient can occur if the focus on risks and judgement predominate above hope and positivity.43 A good therapeutic relationship gives health professionals the best opportunity to optimise medical outcomes.44 See Figure 3.
Figure 3

Suggested model of pregnancy care for women with ADPKD.

Abbreviations: ADPKD, autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease; PGD, pre-implantation genetic diagnosis.

Suggested model of pregnancy care for women with ADPKD. Abbreviations: ADPKD, autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease; PGD, pre-implantation genetic diagnosis.

ADPKD Genetics and Genetic Counselling

ADPKD is an autosomal dominant condition, meaning the offspring has 50% chance of inheriting a pathogenic variant from an affected parent. Genetic testing is not indicated in all patients with ADPKD; however, it is recommended for men and women seeking genetic counselling and family planning advice.45 Results of genetic testing, in addition to other factors described above, need to be explored with an experienced health professional to assist in decision-making regarding reproductive options well before pregnancy is planned. Personal and family experience (particularly events such as intracranial aneurysm and haemorrhage, or early ESKD), fertility issues and social circumstances also impact people's decision-making.46 Surveys of patients with ADPKD demonstrate mixed views on genetic testing and reproductive technology options. Less than 20% of the patients in one study would consider termination of pregnancy based on prenatal testing (as low as 4% in an older study47); however, over half of patients would consider pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), and almost 70% believe PGD should be offered.48

Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis

Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) allows embryos without ADPKD pathogenic variants to be selected and implanted using in vitro fertilisation (IVF) technology. PGD requires prior identification of the pathogenic variant causing ADPKD in the affected parent. This may require testing of extended family members in the situation of novel variants to confirm pathogenicity. The variant cannot be identified in percentage of patients (around 10%) using currently available techniques.45 Egg collection, in vitro fertilisation, then testing of embryos is performed. In ADPKD, as 50% of embryos are expected to be affected, the number of embryos likely to be required for successful pregnancy is increased. The unaffected embryo(s) are then implanted. IVF pregnancies are recognised to be associated with increased risks,49 particularly of multiple pregnancy, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, preterm labour and delivery, low birth weight, a small increased risk of birth defects, as well as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and procedural risks. IVF also can be emotionally and financially burdensome, and access may be an issue for many people.

Maternal and Fetal Monitoring During Pregnancy

Women should have an initial review by a multidisciplinary team including an obstetrician and physician/obstetric nephrologist with expertise in high-risk pregnancy. Women should have regular monitoring of blood pressure, renal function, screening for proteinuria (using urine protein:creatinine ratio or urine albumin:creatinine ratio) and bacteriuria (see Figure 1). Frequency of testing should be based on individualised risk assessment depending on baseline parameters. Asymptomatic bacteriuria should be treated. Many women with ADPKD who are low risk (normal pre-pregnancy renal function, without hypertension or proteinuria) may be managed through lower risk care arrangements (ie with midwifery or primary care shared care). In additional to routine fetal monitoring, we would suggest third trimester fetal ultrasound, for assessment of growth parameters, amniotic fluid assessment and uterine artery dopplers, in line with consensus recommendations for pregnancy with CKD50 (see Figure 1).

Timing and Mode of Delivery

Timing and mode of delivery will be individualised, based on the course of each pregnancy. Mode of delivery should be based on usual obstetric indications, and caesarean section to avoid intra-cystic bleeding is not generally recommended.

Common Complications of Pregnancies Affected by ADPKD

Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy

In pregnancy, hypertension is defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) greater than or equal to 140mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) greater than or equal to 90mmHg, using the average of at least two readings taken at least 15 mins apart.51 Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy occur in almost 10% of all pregnancies, and 2–5% of the women develop preeclampsia.52 All hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are more common in women with ADPKD.15,29,36 In one study, 16% developed new-onset hypertension during pregnancy. Twenty-five percent developed a hypertensive complication of pregnancy including 11% who developed preeclampsia.15 Normotensive women with ADPKD who develop any hypertensive disorder of pregnancy are at increased risk of developing chronic hypertension.15

Aspirin Prophylaxis for Preeclampsia

Low dose aspirin (75–150mg daily) is recommended from 12 weeks in women with risk factors for developing preeclampsia including CKD.51,53 There is minimal data on the role of aspirin in women with ADPKD; however, use in this population is recommended by extrapolation of data in other at-risk populations.54,55

Chronic Hypertension

Chronic hypertension is a common complication of ADPKD, and by definition includes hypertension identified in pregnancy prior to 20 weeks’ gestation.51 Pre-existing maternal hypertension in a ADPKD cohort with predominantly normal renal function pre-pregnancy has been found to be the most important independent risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes.15 Women with chronic hypertension are particularly at increased risk of preeclampsia (of women who were normotensive prior to their first pregnancy, 13 (8%) developed preeclampsia vs 54% of those with chronic hypertension), fetal loss and maternal complications.15 Many antihypertensive agents used to control chronic hypertension are not suitable for use in pregnancy; in particular, ACEi and ARB exposure in the second and third trimester may lead to major birth defects including renal agenesis. Recent guidelines50,56 recommend in women with a strong indication for continued renin-angiotensin blockade, ACEi can be stopped after pregnancy is confirmed. This is to prevent uncontrolled proteinuria during the period of time taken to conceive (unless there is significant concern regarding inadvertent exposure into pregnancy due to patient factors). In women without a strong indication for renin-angiotensin blockade (non-proteinuric kidney disease), ACEi and ARB agents should be ceased, and patients stabilised on alternative antihypertensives are suitable for use in pregnancy (see Table 1) prior to attempts to conceive.
Table 1

Preferred Antihypertensive Medications in Pregnancy. Adapted from SOMANZ51 and Hypertension Canada64 Guidelines of Hypertension Management in Pregnancy. Additional Information sourced from Australian Medicines Handbook76

Antihypertensive MedicationDosageMechanism of ActionContra-IndicationsPractice Points/Side Effects
First Line
Labetalol100–400mg TDSNon-selective beta-blocker with mild alpha vasodilator effectBradycardia, heart block, bronchospasmSide effects include bradycardia, bronchospasm, headache, nausea, scalp tingling
Nifedipine XR20–60mg BDDihydropyridine calcium channel blockerAortic stenosisSide effects include headache, flushing, constipation, peripheral oedema, tachycardia
Methyl-dopa250–750mg TDSCentrally acting alpha adrenergic agonistDepressionSlow onset of actionSide effects include dry mouth, sedation, blurred vision, and depression (recommend ceased early in the post-partum period)
Second-Line
Clonidine75–300 µg TDSCentrally acting alpha antagonistBradycardia, depressionWithdrawal effects with rebound hypertension;Avoid in breastfeeding (may cause reduced prolactin)
Hydralazine25–50 mg q8HArteriolar vasodilatorIdiopathic SLE/related diseasesSide effects include flushing, headache, nausea, oedema, reflex tachycardia
Prazosin0.5–5mg TDSAlpha-1 blockerAortic stenosisFirst-dose hypotension, orthostatic hypotension

Abbreviations: BD, twice daily; TDS, three times daily; q8H, 8 hourly; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus.

Preferred Antihypertensive Medications in Pregnancy. Adapted from SOMANZ51 and Hypertension Canada64 Guidelines of Hypertension Management in Pregnancy. Additional Information sourced from Australian Medicines Handbook76 Abbreviations: BD, twice daily; TDS, three times daily; q8H, 8 hourly; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus. Early pregnancy is associated with reduction in blood pressure, with the nadir occurring around mid-pregnancy, and some women may require reduction or withdrawal of antihypertensive therapy during this time.

Gestational or Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension

Gestational or pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) is hypertension that develops after 20 weeks’ gestation.51 Risk of adverse outcomes and development of preeclampsia is higher if earlier onset or more severe hypertension, where onset near term is associated with little increased risk. As for chronic hypertension, women with ADPKD are at increased risk of developing PIH.15,36

Blood Pressure Targets in Pregnancy

Optimal blood pressure control in pregnancy requires balancing the risks of overtreatment and undertreatment. Overtreatment of hypertension, resulting in impaired uteroplacental blood flow has been linked to an increased risk of SGA and low birth weight.57,58 Therefore, targets for blood pressure that may be applied in ADPKD outside of pregnancy (as low as 95/60 to 110/75 mmHg59) may not be appropriate in pregnancy. The Control of Hypertension in Pregnancy Study (CHIPS) investigated blood pressure control in women with PIH or chronic hypertension.60 More severe hypertension was found in the “less tight” (DBP < 100) group compared with “tight” (DBP < 85) group. Post hoc analysis demonstrated an association between the occurrence of severe hypertension and increased risk of pregnancy loss, the need for high-level neonatal care greater than 48 hrs, low birth weight and preterm delivery.61 A subsequent meta-analysis also found an association between less tight control and severe maternal hypertension.62 For the non-CKD population, the current National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines recommend offering treatment if blood pressure is 140/90mmHg or above, and target a blood pressure on treatment of 135/85mmHg.63 Other guidelines are similar.51,64 Specific to patients with CKD, blood pressure targets of less than 135/85mmHg are recommended (but not consistently less than 110/70mmHg).50 Antihypertensive medications commonly used in pregnancy are summarised in Table 2.
Table 2

Summary of Causes of Acute Abdominal Pain in Pregnancy

ObstetricNon-ObstetricExacerbated by PregnancyExtra-Abdominal
Early Pregnancy:Ectopic pregnancyMolar pregnancyOvarian cyst: torsion, hemorrhage, ruptureDegeneration of uterine fibroidsRound ligament painLate Pregnancy:Placental abruptionAcute fatty liver of pregnancyAbdominal pregnancyHemolysis elevated liver enzymes low platelet count syndromePreeclampsiaRuptured uterusFibroid degenerationFallopian tube torsionUterine torsionRuptured rectus musclePolyhydramniosSymphysis diastasisIntraperitoneal bleedSurgical:AppendicitisCholecystitisBiliary colicAcute pancreatitisPeptic ulcerUrolithiasisIntestinal obstructionInflammatory bowel diseaseRuptured aneurysm, including of splenic arteryTraumaMedical:GastroenteritisPorphyriaSickle cell crisisDeep vein thrombosisCystic complications including rupture, hemorrhage and infection in ADPKDGastro-esophageal reflux diseaseGallbladder diseaseCystitisPyelonephritisMusculoskeletal painCardiac painNon-specific abdominal painPleuritic painPsychological drug abuse or withdrawalHerpes zoster infection

Note: Copyright © 2019. Adapted from Zachariah SK, Fenn M, Jacob K, Arthungal SA, Zachariah SA. Management of acute abdomen in pregnancy: current perspectives. Int J Womens Health. 2019;11:119–134.91

Abbreviation: ADPKD, Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.

Summary of Causes of Acute Abdominal Pain in Pregnancy Note: Copyright © 2019. Adapted from Zachariah SK, Fenn M, Jacob K, Arthungal SA, Zachariah SA. Management of acute abdomen in pregnancy: current perspectives. Int J Womens Health. 2019;11:119–134.91 Abbreviation: ADPKD, Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.

Preeclampsia

Preeclampsia is a multisystem disorder unique to pregnancy. In women with ADPKD, the development of preeclampsia is one of the most important factors determining poor pregnancy/perinatal outcome. Development of preeclampsia in women with ADPKD significantly increased the risk of chronic hypertension and reduced the age at which chronic hypertension was diagnosed (34 years old vs 45 years old).15 It is associated with an increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI); all instances of AKI in a cohort of women with ADPKD in pregnancy occurred in the setting of preeclampsia.15 Preeclampsia is defined as new-onset hypertension and proteinuria or other evidence of maternal end-organ dysfunction (ie hematological, neurological, hepatic, pulmonary edema) or fetal compromise after 20 weeks’ gestation.51 The diagnosis in women with chronic hypertension and renal disease including baseline proteinuria can be extremely difficult and may be clinically indistinguishable from more benign gestational progression of hypertension and proteinuria, progression of underlying renal disease or other superimposed cause of renal impairment. Often when maternal or fetal indications for delivery are met, the underlying aetiology of deterioration may remain unclear. Although not yet in widespread clinical use, angiogenic markers in the prediction and diagnosis of preeclampsia have a significant potential clinical role, including placental growth factor (PlGF) and soluble FMS-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFLT-1). sFLT-1/PIGF ratios have been studied in a CKD population, demonstrating significantly different values between patients with preeclampsia and those with CKD.65 In women with CKD and chronic hypertension between 20 and 36+6 weeks, low maternal plasma PIGF has been demonstrated to have high diagnostic accuracy for prediction of superimposed preeclampsia requiring delivery within 14 days,66 suggesting a potential role in helping guide decision-making regarding admission and delivery. There is currently no therapy that alters the pathophysiology of preeclampsia, and delivery is the only definitive treatment strategy. Severe preeclampsia requires urgent delivery. In non-severe preeclampsia and chronic hypertension/PIH, timing of delivery is dependent on gestational age, balanced with severity of disease and measures of fetal well-being. In women with CKD, specialist input into the additional maternal risks (ie of AKI and irreversible progression of CKD) is recommended and delivery plans must be individualised. Post-partum resolution of preeclampsia can take days or longer, and some features of the disease may worsen initially following delivery; therefore, ongoing close monitoring is required. In those with CKD, blood pressure, proteinuria and renal function may not return to pre-pregnancy baseline. Enalapril (or captopril for short-term use) is safe for use in breastfeeding term infants and is the first-line treatment in most women with ADPKD post-partum.

Urinary Tract Infection

Pregnancy is a time of increased risk of UTI. This is thought to relate to physiological changes in pregnancy, including hydroureter secondary to effects of increased progesterone, changes in the renal tubules causing glycosuria and aminoaciduria, relative immunosuppression/immune changes and in later pregnancy the mechanical effect of gravid uterus. Urinary stasis contributes to increase the risk of pyelonephritis.67 Pyelonephritis has been associated with prematurity, low-birth weight and pregnancy loss.29 Women with ADPKD have a further increased risk of UTI (14%) in pregnancy compared with non-ADPKD controls.36 Increased screening for bacteriuria is recommended in this population with a low threshold for commencing antibiotic prophylaxis for the duration of pregnancy.68 Early recognition of symptoms, urine collection for microscopy, culture and sensitivity and commencement of appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy (with particular consideration to safety in pregnancy and local epidemiology). Cyst infection accounts for up to 10% of the hospital admissions related to complications of ADPKD.69 The gold standard for diagnosis is aspiration of purulent fluid from an infected cyst; however, the diagnosis is usually based on clinical criteria.69 Pyuria is frequently absent, although cyst infection may be secondary to ascending urinary tract infection.70 Ultrasound and CT imaging might not assist with diagnosis; however, contrast CT, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron-emission tomography (PET) may be more useful imaging modalities,71 with MRI the preferred modality in pregnancy. Aggressive management of cyst infection in pregnancy is important, due to the potential adverse events associated with urinary tract infection in pregnancy (as discussed above). In addition to safety in pregnancy and local epidemiology, penetration of antibiotics into cysts needs to be considered (water-soluble antibiotics penetrate cysts poorly compared with lipid-soluble antibiotics72), recognising the potential need for prolonged antibiotics for cyst infections. Large cysts may require surgical drainage.

Renal Tract Obstruction

During pregnancy, physiological hydronephrosis can develop, with an incidence of 60–80%. Changes can be noted on ultrasound in the second trimester and they resolve by 6 weeks postpartum.67 Incidence of hydronephrosis in ADPKD is rare and related to secondary pathology, such as ureteric stricture.73 Single parapelvic cysts identified on routine imaging may be misdiagnosed as hydronephrosis.74

Acute Abdominal Pain

Women with ADPKD may experience acute abdominal pain. The differential diagnosis is summarised in Table 2. Cyst complications include rupture, hemorrhage and infection. Cyst infection typically presents with sudden onset unilateral diffuse flank pain, accompanied by signs of infection. Cyst rupture and hemorrhage is also typically acute onset, unilateral flank pain, but often associated with point tenderness (although pain may be more diffuse if subcapsular hematoma results). These differentials should be considered in an approach to assessing acute abdominal pain.

Chronic Pain

Chronic pain due to capsular distension and other factors can occur in patients with ADPKD and guidelines on management are detailed elsewhere.75 Severe chronic pain syndromes should be managed in conjunction with a pain specialist, and anaesthetic review completed in advance of delivery. Paracetamol is considered safe during all trimesters of pregnancy. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are avoided in pregnancy and used with caution in those with CKD. Opioid analgesics may cause respiratory depression in newborns and withdrawal effects may occur in neonates of dependent mothers.76

Intracranial Aneurysm

Intracranial aneurysms are vascular lesions with increased risk of rupture, which occur in approximately 1.8% of the general population. The frequency in the asymptomatic ADPKD population is around 9–17%, higher in those with a family history.77 Risk factors for rupture included size and location of aneurysm, smoking, hypertension and alcohol excess, and there is noted to be familial clustering of ICA rupture. Guidelines for screening are based on expert opinion and low-quality data, and generally recommend selective screening in those with a family history or other high-risk features (high-risk occupation, uncontrolled hypertension, prior to major surgery, smokers, those requiring anticoagulants, patient anxiety regarding risk).77,78 Although pregnancy is associated with hemodynamic and hormonal changes that can influence aneurysm development and growth, guidelines do not include pregnancy as an indication for screening. Women who are known to have an intracranial aneurysm should be discussed with an experienced neurosurgical department where possible. Data on the risk of aneurysm rupture in pregnancy, delivery and postnatally are conflicting, with some studies suggesting risk is not increased compared with background risk,79,80 however, careful consideration of blood pressure control and mode of delivery is still recommended. Caesarean section is often favoured to avoid hemodynamic changes associated with vaginal delivery. Avoidance of a prolonged second stage with adequate analgesia is another strategy to reduce hemodynamic stress. Data regarding the efficacy of these approaches are lacking.

Polycystic Liver Disease

Polycystic liver disease is the most common extra-renal manifestation of ADPKD and is associated with both PKD1 and PKD2.81 Cyst incidence increases with age, with 33% incidence by 25 and 94% by 45.82 An incidence of 44% was noted in one cohort of pregnant women.36 The majority of patients remain asymptomatic with preserved liver function.81 A proportion of patients develop massive polycystic liver disease that is associated with abdominal mass effect, pain, early satiety, fatigue and cyst infection.83 Other complications are rare. There are no reports on pregnancy-associated complications of polycystic liver disease, and management of complications arising in pregnancy should follow that in the non-pregnant population. Estrogen exposure is associated with increased risk of polycystic liver disease, through pregnancy, estrogen-containing contraceptives84 and hormone replacement therapy.85 Estrogen-containing contraception should therefore be avoided to reduce the risks of worsening liver disease.

Post-Partum Care and Follow-Up of Mother and Baby

Usual post-partum care includes pain management, support with care of the newborn, including feeding and other skills and psychological support (acknowledging the high risk of mental health issues in the post-partum period, especially in the setting of pregnancy complications). Although NSAIDs are used routinely for post-partum analgesia, they should be avoided in women with ADPKD, especially where there is superimposed preeclampsia. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis should be considered based on risk factor assessment, particularly if nephrotic range proteinuria is present,50 which although uncommon in ADPKD can occur with superimposed preeclampsia. An individualised plan should be made to review renal function and blood pressure post-partum. The frequency of immediate follow-up will depend on the individual circumstances. All women should have longer-term monitoring of renal parameters. Contraception needs to be addressed post-partum, with progesterone-only methods favoured in the post-partum period for multiple reasons, including in the context of CKD,50 breastfeeding86 and polycystic liver disease (as discussed above). There is evidence to suggest there are long-term impacts of pregnancy on maternal health and ADPKD. The development of preeclampsia is associated with poorer long-term cardiovascular outcomes.87 Some data suggest in women with ADPKD, having more than three or four pregnancy is associated with accelerated renal impairment.15,88 However, reassuringly, if a woman with ADPKD has an uncomplicated pregnancy, subsequent pregnancies are likely to also progress without complication.15 Babies are at higher risk of lower birth weight, SGA, prematurity, NICU admission and IUGR as discussed above when born to mothers with CKD. ADPKD has also been associated with trends to worse neonatal outcomes; however, numbers are smaller.36 Neonatal factors (such as low birth weight and prematurity) may also be associated with the progression of renal disease long-term.89 Although manifestations of ADPKD usually arise later in life, disease does occur in children, and proteinuria and hypertension may accelerate progression. Therefore, children at risk of inheriting ADPKD are recommended to have blood pressure screened every 2 years after the age of 5 years.90 Genetic testing and ultrasound screening in children remain controversial, and genetic counselling should be sought prior to further investigations as discussed in more detail elsewhere.46,90

Conclusion

In summary, ADPKD has important implications in pregnancy affecting maternal and fetal well-being. It is important for women, their families and health professionals to be aware of these implications and where possible engage in pre-pregnancy planning, careful pregnancy care and adequate follow-up. This should be done with a multidisciplinary team assisting in shared decision-making, including genetics, fertility, nephrology and obstetrics, in order to optimise maternal and fetal outcomes.
  85 in total

1.  Fall in mean arterial pressure and fetal growth restriction in pregnancy hypertension: an updated metaregression analysis.

Authors:  Peter von Dadelszen; Laura A Magee
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2002-12

Review 2.  KHA-CARI Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease Guideline: Genetic Testing for Diagnosis.

Authors:  Michel Tchan; Judy Savige; Chirag Patel; Andrew Mallett; Allison Tong; David J Tunnicliffe; Gopala K Rangan
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.299

Review 3.  Management of renal cyst infection in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marten A Lantinga; Niek F Casteleijn; Alix Geudens; Ruud G L de Sévaux; Sander van Assen; Anna M Leliveld; Ron T Gansevoort; Joost P H Drenth
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 5.992

4.  Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with CKD.

Authors:  Giorgina Barbara Piccoli; Gianfranca Cabiddu; Rossella Attini; Federica Neve Vigotti; Stefania Maxia; Nicola Lepori; Milena Tuveri; Marco Massidda; Cecilia Marchi; Silvia Mura; Alessandra Coscia; Marilisa Biolcati; Pietro Gaglioti; Michele Nichelatti; Luciana Pibiri; Giuseppe Chessa; Antonello Pani; Tullia Todros
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 10.121

5.  Pregnancy outcomes after kidney donation.

Authors:  H N Ibrahim; S K Akkina; E Leister; K Gillingham; G Cordner; H Guo; R Bailey; T Rogers; A J Matas
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 8.086

6.  Pregnancy outcomes according to dialysis commencing before or after conception in women with ESRD.

Authors:  Shilpanjali Jesudason; Blair S Grace; Stephen P McDonald
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 8.237

7.  Multiple pregnancies in CKD patients: an explosive mix.

Authors:  Giorgina Barbara Piccoli; Silvana Arduino; Rossella Attini; Silvia Parisi; Federica Fassio; Marlisa Biolcati; Arianna Pagano; Carlotta Bossotti; Elena Vasario; Valentina Borgarello; Germana Daidola; Martina Ferraresi; Pietro Gaglioti; Tullia Todros
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  Cyst infections in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.

Authors:  Marion Sallée; Cédric Rafat; Jean-Ralph Zahar; Benoît Paulmier; Jean-Pierre Grünfeld; Bertrand Knebelmann; Fadi Fakhouri
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 9.  KDOQI US commentary on the 2012 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of CKD.

Authors:  Lesley A Inker; Brad C Astor; Chester H Fox; Tamara Isakova; James P Lash; Carmen A Peralta; Manjula Kurella Tamura; Harold I Feldman
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2014-03-16       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 10.  Pregnancy across the spectrum of chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Michelle A Hladunewich; Nir Melamed; Kate Bramham
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 10.612

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease and pioglitazone for its therapy: a comprehensive review with an emphasis on the molecular pathogenesis and pharmacological aspects.

Authors:  Aryendu Kumar Saini; Rakesh Saini; Shubham Singh
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 6.354

2.  Birth of two healthy girls following preimplantation genetic diagnosis and gestational surrogacy in a rapidly progressive autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease case using tolvaptan.

Authors:  Ramón Peces; Rocío Mena; Carlos Peces; Emilio Cuesta; Pablo Lapunzina; Rafael Selgas; Julián Nevado
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2021-04-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.