| Literature DB >> 32546928 |
Okti Herawati1, Tri Untari1, Marla Anggita1, Sidna Artanto1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Antibiotic resistance poses a risk to human health and has therefore been the focus of research. One of the causes of this resistance is the use of antibiotics as feed additives for animal nutrition. The development of antibiotic resistance in poultry through nutrition feed has drawn attention to the need for alternative antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs). Mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana L.), as a natural source of bioactive phytochemicals, is a potential AGP, but the effect of mangosteen-based treatment on antibiotic resistance in poultry has not been reported to date. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of mangosteen peel extract as an AGP on body weight gain, feed conversion rate (FCR), and the antibiotic resistance in broilers.Entities:
Keywords: antibiotic resistance; antibiotics; broiler; growth promoters; mangosteen
Year: 2020 PMID: 32546928 PMCID: PMC7245713 DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2020.796-800
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet World ISSN: 0972-8988
The effect of mangosteen peels extract on chicken body weight.
| Parameters | Group A | Group B | Group C |
|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight | |||
| Day 1 | 51.90±6.12 | 50.50±5.46 | 47.60±4.81 |
| 1st week | 445.50±46.898 | 453.80±47.138 | 460.80±38.378 |
| 2nd week | 719.40±68.850 | 718.00±78.330 | 667.20±49.620 |
| 3rd week | 1198.20±88.853 | 1220.70±145.223 | 1167.10±83.298 |
| 4th week | 1389.80±109.700 | 1393.80±212.756 | 1401.60±153.569 |
| Body weight gain | |||
| 1st week | 393.60±43.436 | 403.30±44.535 | 413.20±37.371 |
| 2nd week | 273.90±31.370 | 264.20±37.199 | 206.40±36.127 |
| 3rd week | 478.80±104.303[ | 502.70±79.462[ | 499.90±49.298[ |
| 4th week | 191.60±152.030 | 173.10±108.575 | 234.50±184.117 |
Different superscript indicates significant different. Group A=control, Group B=given AGP, Group C=given mangosteen peels extract (p<0.05). AGP=Antibiotic growth promoter
The effect of mangosteen peels extract on feed intake and FCR.
| Parameters | Group A | Group B | Group C |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feed intake | |||
| 1st week | 175.80±0.0032 | 164.20±0.0030 | 198.80±0.0029 |
| 2nd week | 261.93±0.0033 | 261.26±0.0029 | 237.06±0.0028 |
| 3rd week | 466.66±0.0030 | 466.67±0.0028 | 466.65±0.0020 |
| 4th week | 786.66±0.0025 | 786.65±0.0205 | 786.66±0.0029 |
| FCR | |||
| 1st week | 0.398±0.038 | 0.412±0.046 | 0.485±0.045 |
| 2nd week | 0.366±0.033 | 0.367±0.038 | 0.357±0.026 |
| 3rd week | 1.057±0.431[ | 0.386±0.043[ | 0.401±0.028[ |
| 4th week | 0.569±0.042 | 0.576±0.088 | 0.554±0.059 |
Different superscript indicates significant different. Group A=control, Group B=given AGP, Group C=given mangosteen peels extract (p<0.05). FCR=Feed consumption rate. AGP=Antibiotic growth promoter, FCR=Feed conversion rate
Effect of mangosteen peels extract on percentage of antibiotic resistance (%).
| Antibiotic | Group | Pre-treatment | Post-treatment |
|---|---|---|---|
| CIP | A | 100 | 100 |
| B | 100 | 100 | |
| C | 100 | 100 | |
| CT | A | 100 | 80 |
| B | 100 | 90 | |
| C | 100 | 90 | |
| AML | A | 100 | 100 |
| B | 100 | 100 | |
| C | 100 | 100 | |
| C | A | 70 | 90 |
| B | 50[ | 90[ | |
| C | 100 | 80 | |
| S | A | 100 | 100 |
| B | 90 | 100 | |
| C | 100 | 100 | |
| TE | A | 100 | 100 |
| B | 100 | 100 | |
| C | 100 | 100 | |
| AMP | A | 100 | 100 |
| B | 100 | 100 | |
| C | 100 | 100 | |
| CN | A | 90 | 100 |
| B | 90 | 100 | |
| C | 100 | 100 |
Different superscript indicates significant difference. Group A=control, Group B=given AGP, Group C=given mangosteen peels extract. CIP=Ciprofloxacin, CT=Colistin, AML=Amoxicilin, C=Cloramphenicol, S=Streptomycin, TE=Tetracycline, AMP=Ampicilin, CN=Gentamicin (p<0.05). AGP=Antibiotic growth promoter