PURPOSE: Discovering an incidental finding (IF) or secondary finding (SF) is a potential result of genomic testing, but few data exist describing types and frequencies of SFs likely to appear in broader clinical populations. METHODS: The Electronic Medical Records and Genomics Network Phase III (eMERGE III) developed a CLIA-compliant sequencing panel of 109 genes and 1551 variants of clinical relevance or research interest and deployed this panel at ten clinical sites. We evaluated medically actionable SFs across 67 genes and 14 single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) in a diverse cohort of 21,915 participants drawn from a variety of settings (e.g., primary care, biobanks, specialty clinics). RESULTS: Correcting for testing indication, we found a 3.02% overall frequency of SFs; 2.54% from 59 genes the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics recommends for SF return, and 0.48% in other genes, primarily HFE and PALB2. SFs associated with cancer susceptibility were most frequent (1.38%), followed by cardiovascular diseases (0.87%), and lipid disorders (0.50%). After removing HFE, the frequency of SFs and proportion of pathogenic versus likely pathogenic SFs did not differ in those self-identifying as White versus others. CONCLUSION: Here we present frequencies and types of medically actionable secondary findings to support informed decision making by patients, participants, and practitioners engaged in genomic medicine.
PURPOSE: Discovering an incidental finding (IF) or secondary finding (SF) is a potential result of genomic testing, but few data exist describing types and frequencies of SFs likely to appear in broader clinical populations. METHODS: The Electronic Medical Records and Genomics Network Phase III (eMERGE III) developed a CLIA-compliant sequencing panel of 109 genes and 1551 variants of clinical relevance or research interest and deployed this panel at ten clinical sites. We evaluated medically actionable SFs across 67 genes and 14 single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) in a diverse cohort of 21,915 participants drawn from a variety of settings (e.g., primary care, biobanks, specialty clinics). RESULTS: Correcting for testing indication, we found a 3.02% overall frequency of SFs; 2.54% from 59 genes the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics recommends for SF return, and 0.48% in other genes, primarily HFE and PALB2. SFs associated with cancer susceptibility were most frequent (1.38%), followed by cardiovascular diseases (0.87%), and lipid disorders (0.50%). After removing HFE, the frequency of SFs and proportion of pathogenic versus likely pathogenic SFs did not differ in those self-identifying as White versus others. CONCLUSION: Here we present frequencies and types of medically actionable secondary findings to support informed decision making by patients, participants, and practitioners engaged in genomic medicine.
Entities:
Keywords:
clinical sequencing; eMERGE; incidental findings secondary findings; personal genomics
Authors: Laura M Amendola; Kathleen Muenzen; Leslie G Biesecker; Kevin M Bowling; Greg M Cooper; Michael O Dorschner; Catherine Driscoll; Ann Katherine M Foreman; Katie Golden-Grant; John M Greally; Lucia Hindorff; Dona Kanavy; Vaidehi Jobanputra; Jennifer J Johnston; Eimear E Kenny; Shannon McNulty; Priyanka Murali; Jeffrey Ou; Bradford C Powell; Heidi L Rehm; Bradley Rolf; Tamara S Roman; Jessica Van Ziffle; Saurav Guha; Avinash Abhyankar; David Crosslin; Eric Venner; Bo Yuan; Hana Zouk; Gail P Jarvik Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2020-10-26 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Jessica Ezzell Hunter; Charisma L Jenkins; Joanna E Bulkley; Marian J Gilmore; Kristy Lee; Christine M Pak; Kathleen E Wallace; Adam H Buchanan; Ann Katherine M Foreman; Amanda S Freed; Scott Goehringer; Kandamurugu Manickam; Naomi J L Meeks; Erin M Ramos; Neethu Shah; Robert D Steiner; Sai Lakshmi Subramanian; Tracy Trotter; Elizabeth M Webber; Marc S Williams; Katrina A B Goddard; Bradford C Powell Journal: Genet Med Date: 2022-03-25 Impact factor: 8.864
Authors: Andrew M Glazer; Giovanni Davogustto; Christian M Shaffer; Carlos G Vanoye; Reshma R Desai; Eric H Farber-Eger; Ozan Dikilitas; Ning Shang; Jennifer A Pacheco; Tao Yang; Ayesha Muhammad; Jonathan D Mosley; Sara L Van Driest; Quinn S Wells; Lauren Lee Shaffer; Olivia R Kalash; Yuko Wada; Sarah Bland; Zachary T Yoneda; Devyn W Mitchell; Brett M Kroncke; Iftikhar J Kullo; Gail P Jarvik; Adam S Gordon; Eric B Larson; Teri A Manolio; Tooraj Mirshahi; Jonathan Z Luo; Daniel Schaid; Bahram Namjou; Tarek Alsaied; Rajbir Singh; Ashutosh Singhal; Cong Liu; Chunhua Weng; George Hripcsak; James D Ralston; Elizabeth M McNally; Wendy K Chung; David S Carrell; Kathleen A Leppig; Hakon Hakonarson; Patrick Sleiman; Sunghwan Sohn; Joseph Glessner; Joshua Denny; Wei-Qi Wei; Alfred L George; M Benjamin Shoemaker; Dan M Roden Journal: Circulation Date: 2021-12-21 Impact factor: 39.918
Authors: Deborah J Bowen; Sukh Makhnoon; Brian H Shirts; Stephanie M Fullerton; Eric Larson; James D Ralston; Kathleen Leppig; David R Crosslin; David Veenstra; Gail P Jarvik Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2021-01-07
Authors: Steven M Harrison; Christina A Austin-Tse; Serra Kim; Matthew Lebo; Annette Leon; David Murdock; Aparna Radhakrishnan; Brian H Shirts; Marcie Steeves; Eric Venner; Richard A Gibbs; Gail P Jarvik; Heidi L Rehm Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2021-12-28 Impact factor: 4.700