| Literature DB >> 32546712 |
Charles Nkufi Tango1, Sang-Soo Seo2, Minji Kwon1, Dong-Ock Lee2, Ha Kyun Chang2, Mi Kyung Kim3.
Abstract
The cervical microbiome is associated with cervical cancer risk, but how microbial diversity and functional profiles change in cervical cancer remains unclear. Herein, we investigated microbial-compositional and functional differences between a control group and a high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer (CIN2/3-CC) group. After retrospective collection of 92 cervical swab samples, we carried out 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing on 50 and 42 samples from the control and CIN2/3-CC groups, respectively. The EzBioCloud pipeline was applied to identify the genomic features associated with the groups using 16S rRNA data. A linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) was performed to assess the enrichment in the assigned taxonomic and functional profiles. We found a lower richness in the control group relative to the CIN2/3-CC group; however, the β-diversity tended to be similar between the groups. The LEfSe analysis showed that a phylum Sacchaaribacteria_TM7, 11 genera, and 21 species were more abundant in the CIN2/3-CC group and that one uncharacterized Gardnerella species was more abundant only in the control group. Further characterization of the functional pathways using EzBioCloud showed that the 4 KEGG orthologs (Phosphotransferase system [PTS] sucrose-specific IIA, IIB, IIC components and PTS cellubiose-specific IIC component) were involved in the KEGG pathway of starch and sucrose metabolism. The two pathways of folate biosynthesis and oxidative phosphorylation were more abundant in the CIN2/3-CC group. Further confirmation of these results in larger samples can help to elucidate the potential association between the cervical microbiome and cervical cancer.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32546712 PMCID: PMC7297964 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-66607-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Demographic and lifestyle characteristics of study subjects.
| Characteristics | Control (n = 50) | CIN2/3-CC (n = 42) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years)a | 45.1 (11.6) | 45.7 (11.7) | 0.877 |
| Body-mass index (Kg/m2)a | 21.9 (2.8) | 22.1 (2.9) | 0.97 |
| HPV status (%) | |||
| Positive | 27 (54.0) | 29 (69.1) | 0.141 |
| Negative | 23 (46.0) | 13 (30.9) | |
| Menopause status (%)b | |||
| Pre-menopause | 29 (63.0)b | 25 (62.5) | 0.959 |
| Post-menopause | 17 (37.0) | 15 (37.5) | |
| Smoking status (%)b | |||
| No | 37 (80.4) | 35 (87.5) | 0.376 |
| Yes | 9 (19.6) | 5 (12.5) | |
| Alcohol-drinking status (%) | |||
| No | 15 (35.6) | 6 (15.0) | 0.058 |
| Yes | 31 (67.4) | 34 (85.0) | |
| Oral contraception use (%)b | |||
| No | 38 (82.6) | 33 (82.5) | 0.989 |
| Yes | 8 (17.4) | 7 (17.5) | |
aFor age and body-mass index, the values are in means (standard deviations).
bFor menopause, smoking, alcohol-drinking status and oral contraception use, values are in frequencies (%). The p-value was calculated by chi-squared test for categorical variables and by t- test for continuous variables.
Figure 1Comparison of species richness and α-, β-diversities in microbiome taxonomic profile between control and CIN2/3-CC groups by (A). Chao1, (B). Number of OTUs, (C). Shannon, (D). Simpson, and (E). Bray-Curtis indices. The Shannon and Simpson α-diversity indices were applied to estimate the diversity for each group using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Beta diversity was calculated with Bray-Curtis distances based on the taxonomic abundance profiles. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) was applied to measure the statistical significances of β-diversity.
Relative abundances of taxonomic composition of cervical microbiome at phylum level in study groups.
| Taxon rank | Taxa name | Normal (%) | CIN2/3-CC (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phylum | 11.09 | 6.87 | 0.5870 | |
| 7.54 | 10.79 | 0.0919 | ||
| 74.60 | 67.46 | 0.2098 | ||
| 2.71 | 5.20 | 0.3515 | ||
| 3.21 | 6.34 | 0.4710 | ||
| 0.79 | 2.72 | 0.4533 | ||
| 0.04 | 0.50 | 0.0029 | ||
| 7 | 0.02 | 0.61 | ||
| ETC |
ETC: All taxa that are present in minor quantity (under 0.1% in average relative abundance). The p-value was calculated by Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
Figure 2Differences in relative abundances of microbial taxa (genus and species) between groups by LEfSe analysis (Logarithmic LDA score >2.0; alpha value <0.05).
Relative abundances of microbial taxa in control and CIN2/3-CCgroups. The statistical significance was tested using LEfSe analysis at the p-value of 0.05.
| Taxon rank | Taxon name | Normal | CIN2/3-CC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phylum | 0.00291 | 0.03892 | 0.49686 | |
| Class | 0.00291 | 0.03892 | 0.49686 | |
| Order | 0.00291 | 0.03892 | 0.49686 | |
| 0.00395 | 0.07537 | 0.45815 | ||
| 0.01669 | 0.08926 | 0.44539 | ||
| Family | 0.00967 | 0.00593 | 0.21032 | |
| 0.01148 | 1.78512 | 6.82772 | ||
| 0.01419 | 0.03194 | 0.40041 | ||
| 0.01669 | 0.08926 | 0.44539 | ||
| 0.02275 | 0.03892 | 0.47207 | ||
| 0.04428 | 0.94424 | 3.50125 | ||
| Genus | 0.00301 | 0.00117 | 0.28635 | |
| 0.00601 | 0 | 0.03159 | ||
| 0.01216 | 1.78512 | 6.79264 | ||
| 0.01263 | 0 | 0.22499 | ||
| 0.01263 | 0 | 0.1733 | ||
| 0.01419 | 0.03194 | 0.40041 | ||
| 0.01841 | 0.09564 | 0.59931 | ||
| 0.02028 | 0.00368 | 0.79473 | ||
| 0.02653 | 0 | 0.43576 | ||
| 0.02653 | 0 | 0.75755 | ||
| 0.03125 | 0.08685 | 0.377 | ||
| Species | 0.00131 | 0.04132 | 0 | |
| 0.00159 | 0.0003 | 0.27272 | ||
| 0.00601 | 0 | 0.11708 | ||
| 0.00758 | 0.00529 | 0.07693 | ||
| 0.01207 | 0.00027 | 0.12544 | ||
| 0.01263 | 0 | 0.05054 | ||
| 0.01297 | 1.09446 | 3.17349 | ||
| 0.01603 | 0.00083 | 1.15388 | ||
| 0.02028 | 0.00368 | 0.64059 | ||
| 0.02441 | 0.00041 | 0.16109 | ||
| 0.02653 | 0 | 1.08661 | ||
| 0.02653 | 0 | 0.4266 | ||
| 0.02653 | 0 | 0.05483 | ||
| 0.02653 | 0 | 0.07283 | ||
| 0.02653 | 0 | 0.21356 | ||
| 0.02653 | 0 | 0.03487 | ||
| 0.02784 | 0.00142 | 0.04329 | ||
| 0.02853 | 0.39632 | 3.28472 | ||
| 0.02943 | 0.08332 | 0.35307 | ||
| 0.03192 | 0.01197 | 0.6767 | ||
| 0.04505 | 0.67222 | 1.4389 |
Figure 3Differences in Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway profiles between groups by LEfSe analysis (Logarithmic LDA score >2.0; alpha value <0.05). A. Pathway enrichment for KEGG cellular processes in control and CIN2/3-CC groups. B. Orthology enrichment for KEGG cellular processes in control and CIN2/3-CC groups.
Mean relative abundances of 3 KEGG pathways and 4 KEGG orthologs (KO) involved in pathways identified using LEfSe analysis at the p-value of 0.05.
| KEGG Pathway | Pathway Name | Control | CIN2/3-CC | Orthology | Definition | Control | CIN2/3-CC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ko00500 | Starch and sucrose metabolism | 1.5275 | 1.2775 | 0.0282 | K02761 | Phosphotransferase syst cellobiose-specificIIC | 2.6781 | 0.2026 | 0.0250 |
| K02808 | Phosphotransferase syst sucrose-specific IIA | 2.1389 | 0.0573 | 0.0065 | |||||
| K02809 | Phosphotransferase syst sucrose-specific IIB | 2.3309 | 0.1159 | 0.0456 | |||||
| K02810 | Phosphotransferase syst sucrose-specific IIC | 2.3387 | 0.1158 | 0.0408 | |||||
| ko00190 | Oxidative phosphorylation | 0.8920 | 0.9423 | 0.0083 | |||||
| Ko00790 | Folate biosynthesis | 0.4876 | 0.5349 | 0.0465 |