Literature DB >> 32546646

ESR1 Mutations and Overall Survival on Fulvestrant versus Exemestane in Advanced Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: A Combined Analysis of the Phase III SoFEA and EFECT Trials.

Stephen R D Johnston1, Stephen K Chia2, Nicholas C Turner3,1, Claire Swift1, Lucy Kilburn4, Charlotte Fribbens5,1, Matthew Beaney5, Isaac Garcia-Murillas5, Aman U Budzar6, John F R Robertson7, William Gradishar8, Martine Piccart9, Gaia Schiavon10, Judith M Bliss4, Mitch Dowsett5,1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: ESR1 mutations are acquired frequently in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer after prior aromatase inhibitors. We assessed the clinical utility of baseline ESR1 circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis in the two phase III randomized trials of fulvestrant versus exemestane. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: The phase III EFECT and SoFEA trials randomized patients with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer who had progressed on prior nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor therapy, between fulvestrant 250 mg and exemestane. Baseline serum samples from 227 patients in EFECT, and baseline plasma from 161 patients in SoFEA, were analyzed for ESR1 mutations by digital PCR. The primary objectives were to assess the impact of ESR1 mutation status on progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in a combined analysis of both studies.
RESULTS: ESR1 mutations were detected in 30% (151/383) baseline samples. In patients with ESR1 mutation detected, PFS was 2.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.0-2.6] on exemestane and 3.9 months (95% CI, 3.0-6.0) on fulvestrant [hazard ratio (HR), 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39-0.89; P = 0.01). In patients without ESR1 mutations detected, PFS was 4.8 months (95% CI, 3.7-6.2) on exemestane and 4.1 months (95% CI, 3.6-5.5) on fulvestrant (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.81-1.37; P = 0.69). There was an interaction between ESR1 mutation and treatment (P = 0.02). Patients with ESR1 mutation detected had 1-year OS of 62% (95% CI, 45%-75%) on exemestane and 80% (95% CI, 68%-87%) on fulvestrant (P = 0.04; restricted mean survival analysis). Patients without ESR1 mutations detected had 1-year OS of 79% (95% CI, 71%-85%) on exemestane and 81% (95% CI, 74%-87%) on fulvestrant (P = 0.69).
CONCLUSIONS: Detection of ESR1 mutations in baseline ctDNA is associated with inferior PFS and OS in patients treated with exemestane versus fulvestrant. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32546646     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-0224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  21 in total

Review 1.  Clinical application of circulating tumor DNA in breast cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey Chun Hin Chan; James Chung Hang Chow; Connie Hoi Man Ho; Therese Yue Man Tsui; William C Cho
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 2.  Understanding and overcoming tumor heterogeneity in metastatic breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Nida Pasha; Nicholas C Turner
Journal:  Nat Cancer       Date:  2021-07-19

3.  Clinical value of next-generation sequencing in guiding decisions regarding endocrine therapy for advanced HR-positive/HER-2-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Dan Lyu; Binliang Liu; Bo Lan; Xiaoying Sun; Lixi Li; Jingtong Zhai; Haili Qian; Fei Ma
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 4.026

4.  Estrogen Receptor Alpha and ESR1 Mutations in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jaymin M Patel; Rinath M Jeselsohn
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 5.  Clinical and Biological Aspects of Disseminated Tumor Cells and Dormancy in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Alexander Ring; Maria Spataro; Andreas Wicki; Nicola Aceto
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-06-28

6.  Ki67 and progesterone receptor status predicts sensitivity to palbociclib: a real-world study.

Authors:  Xiying Shao; Yabing Zheng; Wenming Cao; Xiabo Shen; Guangliang Li; Junqing Chen; Yuan Huang; Ping Huang; Lei Shi; Weiwu Ye; Weibin Zou; Caijin Lou; Lei Lei; Jian Huang; Zhanhong Chen; Xiaojia Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

7.  Serial monitoring of genomic alterations in circulating tumor cells of ER-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: feasibility of precision oncology biomarker detection.

Authors:  Andi K Cani; Emily M Dolce; Elizabeth P Darga; Kevin Hu; Chia-Jen Liu; Jackie Pierce; Kieran Bradbury; Elaine Kilgour; Kimberly Aung; Gaia Schiavon; Danielle Carroll; T Hedley Carr; Teresa Klinowska; Justin Lindemann; Gayle Marshall; Vicky Rowlands; Elizabeth A Harrington; J Carl Barrett; Nitharsan Sathiyayogan; Christopher Morrow; Valeria Sero; Anne C Armstrong; Richard Baird; Erika Hamilton; Seock-Ah Im; Komal Jhaveri; Manish R Patel; Caroline Dive; Scott A Tomlins; Aaron M Udager; Daniel F Hayes; Costanza Paoletti
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 7.449

8.  Endocrine Treatment and Targeted Therapy for Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: ASCO Guideline Update.

Authors:  Harold J Burstein; Mark R Somerfield; Debra L Barton; Ali Dorris; Lesley J Fallowfield; Dharamvir Jain; Stephen R D Johnston; Larissa A Korde; Jennifer K Litton; Erin R Macrae; Lindsay L Peterson; Praveen Vikas; Rachel L Yung; Hope S Rugo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Landmark trials in the medical oncology management of metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Pei Lu; Cesar A Santa-Maria; Tarah J Ballinger; Jennifer Y Sheng
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 5.385

Review 10.  The breast is yet to come: current and future utility of circulating tumour DNA in breast cancer.

Authors:  Brad A Davidson; Sarah Croessmann; Ben H Park
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 9.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.