| Literature DB >> 32545644 |
Juan Antonio Jimber Del Río1, Ricardo David Hernández-Rojas1, Virginia Navajas-Romero2, Amalia Hidalgo-Fernández1.
Abstract
Tourism in synagogues is an activity which is increasing in popularity due to the current interest in cultural and patrimonial heritage. The synagogue in Córdoba has become an irreplaceable Jewish tourist destination in Spain due to its origins, construction, conservation, and recognition by international organizations. This article analyzes the loyalty of tourism in synagogues using variables such as satisfaction, loyalty and the expected and perceived value of the destination and the historical monument using a structural research equations methodology. No previous studies on tourism at synagogues using structural equations have been made. The data was obtained by means of a survey given to 350 tourists visiting this cultural heritage site. The results showed that there is strong loyalty to the heritage site as well as the destination.Entities:
Keywords: Jewish; local community; loyalty; satisfaction; synagogues; tourism
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32545644 PMCID: PMC7345720 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17124212
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Research model.
Scales used.
| Reference | Dimension | Indicators |
|---|---|---|
| [ | Expectations | (EXP3) Degree of mass tourism in the city |
| [ | Satisfaction | (S3) Service received from Synagogue workers |
| [ | Loyalty | (R1) I would recommend friends and family to visit Córdoba |
| [ | Perceived quality | (CAL18) Dining offer in the Synagogue surroundings |
| [ | Perceived value | (CP16) Accommodation offer in the city |
Figure 2Path diagram of the proposed model.
Standardized structural coefficients of the observed variables regarding the latent variables.
| Latent Variable | Observed Variable | Standardized Coefficient |
|---|---|---|
| Expected Quality | EXP3 Degree of mass tourism in the city | 0.333 |
| EXP8 Safety in general | 0.421 | |
| EXP10 Safety in the synagogue’s surroundings | 0.564 | |
| EXP13 Prestige of the Synagogue | 0.633 | |
| EXP16 Accommodation on offer in the city | 0.680 | |
| Perceived Quality | CAL18 Dining offer in the Synagogue surroundings | 0.657 |
| CAL17 Travel offer to reach the city | 0.6 | |
| CAL16 Safety in the Synagogue surroundings | 0.476 | |
| CAL9 Information and signposting | 0.612 | |
| CAL19 Accommodation offer in the Synagogue surroundings | 0.675 | |
| CAL8 Time waiting to enter the Synagogue | 0.614 | |
| CAL3 Hospitality/Service | 0.423 | |
| CAL12 Information and signposting on reaching the Synagogue | 0.328 | |
| Perceived Value | CP16 Accommodation offer in the city | 0.239 |
| CP18 Dining offer in the Synagogue surroundings | 0.671 | |
| CP7 Preservation of the Synagogue | 0.548 | |
| CP6 Prestige of the Synagogue | 0.639 | |
| Satisfaction | S3 Service received from Synagogue workers | 0.585 |
| S5 Price for visiting the Synagogue | 0.587 | |
| S7 Degree of satisfaction for additional services | 0.639 | |
| Loyalty | R1 I would recommend friends and family to visit Córdoba | 0.513 |
| R2 I will return to visit Córdoba during next holidays | 0.646 | |
| R3 I will return to visit Córdoba soon | 0.657 |
Standardized coefficients and p-values that support the hypothesis.
| Hypothesis | Latent Variable | Latent Variable | Standardized Coefficient | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | Expected quality | Perceived value | 0.759 | 0.000 |
| H2 | Expected quality | Perceived quality | 1.015 | 0.000 |
| H3 | Perceived quality | Satisfaction | 0.468 | 0.010 |
| H4 | Perceived value | Satisfaction | 0.451 | 0.016 |
| H5 | Satisfaction | Loyalty | 0.653 | 0.001 |
Figure 3Path diagram of the proposed model with the p value.
The goodness of fit model.
| Fit of the Model | Value |
|---|---|
|
| |
| Chi-square/DF | 0.932 |
| GFI | 0.896 |
| RMSEA | 0.001 |
| RMR | 0.069 |
|
| |
| AGFI | 0.858 |
|
| |
| PNFI | 0.685 |
| PCFI | 0.798 |
The indices of the latent variables (IVL).
| Latent Variable Index (IVL) | Likert Scale | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Expected Quality Index | 5392 | 77.04% |
| Perceived Quality Index | 6166 | 88.09% |
| Perceived Value Index | 5603 | 80.05% |
| Satisfaction Index | 5502 | 78.60% |
| Loyalty Index | 4602 | 65.74% |