| Literature DB >> 32545588 |
Jung Hwan Ahn1, Junhyeong Kim1, Naveed Ur Rehman1, Hye-Jin Kim1, Mi-Jeong Ahn1, Hye Jin Chung1.
Abstract
Herbal drugs are widely used for the auxiliary treatment of diseases. The pharmacokinetics of a drug may be altered when it is coadministered with herbal drugs that can affect drug absorption. The effects of herbal drugs on absorption must be evaluated. In this study, we investigated the effects of Rumex acetosa (R. acetosa) extract on fexofenadine absorption. Fexofenadine was selected as a model drug that is a substrate of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and organic anion transporting polypeptide 1A2 (OATP1A2). Emodine-the major component of R. acetosa extract-showed P-gp inhibition in vitro and in vivo. Uptake of fexofenadine via OATP1A2 was inhibited by R. acetosa extract in OATP1A2 transfected cells. A pharmacokinetic study showed that the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of fexofenadine was smaller in the R. acetosa extract coadministered group than in the control group. R. acetosa extract also decreased aqueous solubility of fexofenadine HCl. The results of this study suggest that R. acetosa extract could inhibit the absorption of certain drugs via intervention in the aqueous solubility and the drug transporters. Therefore, R. acetosa extract may cause drug interactions when coadministered with substrates of drug transporters and poorly water-soluble drugs, although further clinical studies are needed.Entities:
Keywords: P-glycoprotein (P-gp); Rumex acetosa; drug interaction; fexofenadine; organic anion transporting polypeptide 1A2 (OATP1A2); pharmacokinetics
Year: 2020 PMID: 32545588 PMCID: PMC7355497 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12060547
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceutics ISSN: 1999-4923 Impact factor: 6.321
Figure 1Cytotoxicity of R. acetosa extract in (A) Caco-2 cells and (B) HEK293 cells (n = 6). Con—media only treated control; Veh—vehicle treated group; *—p < 0.05 compared to media only treated control group.
Figure 2P-gp inhibitory effect of anthraquinones in Caco-2 cells. Cells were treated with 10-μM anthraquinones or 100-μM verapamil (n = 3). Con—vehicle treated control; Ver—verapamil; 1—chrysophanol; 2—chrysophanol-8-O-β-d-glucoside; 3—emodin; 4—emodin-8-O-β-d-glucoside; 5—physcion; 6—physcion-8-O-β-d-glucoside; *—p < 0.05 compared to control group.
Figure 3P-gp inhibition test of R. acetosa extract using an MDR kit in Caco-2 cells (n = 6). Con—vehicle treated control; Ver—100-μM verapamil; *—p < 0.05 compared to control group.
Figure 4Inhibitory effect of R. acetosa extract on fexofenadine uptake in OATP1A2/SLCO1A2 transfected HEK293 cells (n = 6). Con—OATP1A2/SLCO1A2 transfected control; Nov—untransfected control; Ver—100-μM verapamil; *—p < 0.05 compared to control group.
Figure 5Mean plasma concentration–time profiles of fexofenadine (ng/mL) after oral coadministration of fexofenadine (10 mg/kg) with vehicle (●; n = 6), emodin (11 mg/ kg, ○; n = 6) and R. acetosa extract (2 g/kg, ▼; n = 6) to rats. Bars represent standard deviations.
Pharmacokinetic parameters of fexofenadine after oral coadministration of fexofenadine (10 mg/kg) with vehicle (control), emodin and R. acetosa extract to rats. Values represent means ± standard deviations for AUC0-24 h and Cmax (ng/mL), median (range) for Tmax.
| Parameters | Control | Emodin | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUC0-24 h (ng∙h/mL) | 222.0 ± 85.5 | 411.9 ± 189.1 * | 132.0 ± 50.5 |
| Cmax (ng/mL) | 36.4 ± 22.8 | 53.4 ± 33.9 | 32.9 ± 28.5 |
| Tmax (h) | 0.75 (0.5–1) | 0.75 (0.5–1) | 0.75 (0.25–8) |
AUC0-24 h, total area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time zero to 24 h; Cmax—maximum plasma concentration; Tmax—time to reach Cmax; *—p < 0.05 compared to vehicle only control group.
Figure 6FT-IR spectra of (A) fexofenadine, (B) a mixture of fexofenadine and R. acetosa extract and (C) R. acetosa extract.
The solubility of fexofenadine HCl in simulated intestinal fluid (SIF) with and without R. acetosa extract.
| Solubility | Without | With |
|---|---|---|
| Fexofenadine HCl concentration (mg/mL) | 1.03 ± 0.04 | 0.83 ± 0.10 * |
*—p < 0.05 compared to without R. acetosa extract.