| Literature DB >> 32545551 |
Nelson Castro1, Margarida M Fernandes2,3, Clarisse Ribeiro2,3, Vítor Correia4, Rikardo Minguez5, Senentxu Lanceros-Méndez1,6.
Abstract
Biomimetic bioreactor systems are increasingly being developed for tissue engineering applications, due to their ability to recreate the native cell/tissue microenvironment. Regarding bone-related diseases and considering the piezoelectric nature of bone, piezoelectric scaffolds electromechanically stimulated by a bioreactor, providing the stimuli to the cells, allows a biomimetic approach and thus, mimicking the required microenvironment for effective growth and differentiation of bone cells. In this work, a bioreactor has been designed and built allowing to magnetically stimulate magnetoelectric scaffolds and therefore provide mechanical and electrical stimuli to the cells through magnetomechanical or magnetoelectrical effects, depending on the piezoelectric nature of the scaffold. While mechanical bioreactors need direct application of the stimuli on the scaffolds, the herein proposed magnetic bioreactors allow for a remote stimulation without direct contact with the material. Thus, the stimuli application (23 mT at a frequency of 0.3 Hz) to cells seeded on the magnetoelectric, leads to an increase in cell viability of almost 30% with respect to cell culture under static conditions. This could be valuable to mimic what occurs in the human body and for application in immobilized patients. Thus, special emphasis has been placed on the control, design and modeling parameters governing the bioreactor as well as its functional mechanism.Entities:
Keywords: magnetic actuator; magnetic bioreactor; magnetoactive scaffolds; magnetoelectric stimulation; tissue engineering
Year: 2020 PMID: 32545551 PMCID: PMC7349750 DOI: 10.3390/s20123340
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Magnetoelectric bioreactor operating principle through the use of electrical and mechanical controls to produce an alternated magnetic field and thus stimulate the magnetoelectric scaffolds and, consequently, the cells.
Figure 2(a) Magnetic field intensity distribution at the bottom of 24-wells cell culture plates, (b) magnetic field force lines simulation in frontal and side planes and (c) rendered model of the mechanical permanent magnets table ball-screw assembly.
Figure 3(a) Representation of the bioreactor assembled with a cell culture plate; (b) Bioreactor prototype built mechanism with every component; and schematic representation of (c) all disassembled main electric and mechanical components and (d) of the mechanical component represented as a transversal cut.
Figure 4Main circuits used for the power conversion (A), user interface (B), sensors (C), system control (D), actuators (E) and wireless communications (F).
Figure 5State machine control nodes.
Bioreactor user control variables and respective ranges to be set in the programs menu.
| User Control Variables | Description | Ranges |
|---|---|---|
| Displacement | Distance traveled by the respective permanent magnet platforms. | 5–25 mm |
| Frequency | Frequency of stretch or magnetic field stimuli signal to be applied. | 0.1–2 Hz |
| Runtime | Culture total running time. | 1–180 d |
| Cycle 1 active time | Active time of sublayer cycle included in the main layer active time. | 1–360 min |
| Cycle 1 resting time | Resting time of sublayer cycle included in the main layer active time. | 1–360 min |
| Cycle 2 active time | Active time of the main layer cycle. | 1–24 h |
| Cycle 2 resting time | Resting time of the main layer cycle. | 1–24 h |
| Shutdown temperature | Temperature value, which shuts down stimuli until culture temperature lowers to safety values again. | 30–40 (°C) |
Figure 6(a) Stimuli schedule timing programmed in the bioreactor for pre-osteoblast tissue culture assays using either static or dynamic conditions and (b) cell viability after 48 h of cell culture on TD/PVDF films with and without magnetic stimuli. The cell viability was calculated regarding the cells growing on the non-poled ME film at static conditions presented as % of growth. In each study, three samples were assayed per studied condition.