Literature DB >> 32544959

Efficacy and safety of peroral cholangioscopy with intraductal lithotripsy for difficult biliary stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Thomas R McCarty1,2, Rishabh Gulati3, Tarun Rustagi3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND : Peroral cholangioscopy with intraductal lithotripsy facilitates optically guided stone fragmentation of difficult biliary stones refractory to conventional endoscopic therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of peroral cholangioscopy with intraductal lithotripsy for difficult biliary stones. METHODS : Searches of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were performed in accordance with PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. Measured outcomes included overall fragmentation success, single-session fragmentation and duct clearance, and rate of adverse events. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed based upon cholangioscopy technique and type of lithotripsy (laser versus electrohydraulic). Heterogeneity was assessed with I 2 statistics. Publication bias was ascertained by funnel plot and Egger regression testing. RESULTS : 35 studies were included with 1762 participants (43.4 % men; mean age 61.5 [standard deviation (SD) 11.0]). Prior cholecystectomy had been performed in 37 % of patients, with a mean number of 1.6 (SD 0.5) ERCPs performed prior to lithotripsy. Mean stone size was 1.8 (SD 0.3) cm. Peroral cholangioscopy with intraductal lithotripsy achieved an overall stone fragmentation success of 91.2 % (95 %CI 88.1 % - 93.6 %; I 2 = 63.2 %) with an average of 1.3 [SD 0.6] lithotripsy sessions performed. Complete single-session fragmentation success was 76.9 % (95 %CI 71.6 % - 81.4 %; I 2 = 74.3 %). The adverse events rate was 8.9 % (95 %CI 6.5 % - 12.2 %; I 2 = 60.6 %). Mean procedure time for peroral cholangioscopy was 67.1 (SD 21.4) minutes. There was no difference in overall fragmentation rate or adverse events; however, laser lithotripsy was associated with a higher single-session fragmentation rate and shorter procedure time compared with electrohydraulic lithotripsy. CONCLUSIONS : Peroral cholangioscopy with intraductal lithotripsy appears to be a relatively safe and effective modality for difficult biliary stones. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32544959     DOI: 10.1055/a-1200-8064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   9.776


  3 in total

1.  Factors Influencing Performance of Cholangioscopy-Guided Lithotripsy Including Available Different Technologies: A Prospective Multicenter Study with 94 Patients.

Authors:  Gonçalo Alexandrino; Luís Lopes; João Fernandes; Marta Moreira; Tarcísio Araújo; Sara Campos; Rui Loureiro; Luísa Figueiredo; Luís Carvalho Lourenço; David Horta; Tiago Bana E Costa; Patrício Costa; Jorge Canena
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 3.487

2.  Endoscopic intraductal lithotripsy of biliary stones using thulium laser: preliminary results of a single-center experience.

Authors:  Lorenzo Dioscoridi; Edoardo Forti; Francesco Pugliese; Marcello Cintolo; Giulia Bonato; Francesca Aprile; Alessio Renga; Massimiliano Mutignani
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 3.  Difficult Biliary Stones: A Comprehensive Review of New and Old Lithotripsy Techniques.

Authors:  Edoardo Troncone; Michelangela Mossa; Pasquale De Vico; Giovanni Monteleone; Giovanna Del Vecchio Blanco
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 2.430

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.