| Literature DB >> 32544376 |
Katherine Schultheis1, Holly M Pugh1, Janet Oh1, Jacklyn Nguyen1, Bryan Yung1, Charles Reed1, Neil Cooch1, Jing Chen1, Jian Yan1, Kar Muthumani2, Laurent M Humeau1, David B Weiner2, Kate E Broderick1, Trevor R F Smith1.
Abstract
Respiratory Syncytial virus (RSV) is a major threat to many vulnerable populations. There are currently no approved vaccines, and RSV remains a high unmet global medical need. Here we describe the employment of a novel synthetic DNA-encoded antibody technology platform to develop and deliver an engineered human DNA-encoded monoclonal antibody (dMAbTM) targeting the fusion protein (F) of RSV as a new approach to prevention or therapy of at risk populations. In in vivo models, a single administration of synthetic DNA-encoding the single-chain fragment variable-constant fragment (scFv-Fc) RSV-F dMAb resulted in robust and durable circulating levels of a functional antibody systemically and in mucosal tissue. In cotton rats, which are the gold-standard animals to model RSV infection, we observed sustained scFv-Fc RSV-F dMAb in the sera and lung-lavage samples, demonstrating the potential for both long-lasting immunity to RSV and effective biodistribution. The scFv-Fc RSV-F dMAb harbored in the sera exhibited RSV antigen-specific binding and potent viral neutralizing activity. Importantly, in vivo delivery of synthetic DNA-encoding, the scFv-Fc RSV-F dMAb protected animals against viral challenge. Our findings support the significance of dMAbs as a potential platform technology for durable protection against RSV disease.Entities:
Keywords: DNA-encoded antibody; Respiratory syncytial virus; active immunophrophylaxis; cotton rat; electroporation; plasmid DNA; single-chain antibody
Year: 2020 PMID: 32544376 PMCID: PMC7553682 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1748979
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Vaccin Immunother ISSN: 2164-5515 Impact factor: 3.452
Figure 1.: (a) Illustration of human IgG1 and scFv-Fc formats. The complete hinge and Fc portions of the molecule are retained in the scFv-Fc format. Yellow line connecting VH and VL of the scFv-Fc molecule represents the (G4 S) 3 linker (b) Plasmid map of RSV-F dMAb (bGH PolyA – bovine growth hormone polyadenylation signal, KanR – kanamycin resistance gene, pUC ori – pUC origin of replication, hCMV promotor – human cytomegalovirus promotor) (c) In vitro expression of RSV-F dMAb. Immuno-fluorescence staining was performed on HEK293 T cells 3 days after in vitro transfection (DAPI – blue, RSV-F dMAb – red) (d) Western-blot analysis of cell-culture supernatant of RSV-F dMAb in vitro transfected HEK293 T cells harvested on day 3 post-transfection (lane 1: IgG-RSV dMAb, lane 2: scFv-Fc RSV-F dMAb).
Figure 2.: (a) In vivo EP facilitates the delivery of the dMAb to the muscle tissue, myocytes express (b) and secret the encoded mAb (c). mAb is distributed systemically. (b) Example of expression of dMAb in myocytes 3 days after delivery of 50 µg dMAb or pVax (empty expression vector control) to mouse TA (DAPI – blue, dMAb – green). (c) Serum concentration of RSV-F dMAb and Palivizumab after delivery of 200 µg RSV-F dMAb plasmid or 15 mg/kg (clinical dose) Palivizumab measured by ELISA (± SEM, n = 6) dotted line indicates the level of protection (20 µg/ml) for Palivizumab.
Figure 3.: 200 µg RSV-F dMAb plasmid was administered IM in BALB/c mice (a-d). Serum samples were taken from treated mice before treatment (day 0) and 7 days after treatment to measure (a) Serum expression of RSV-F dMAb. scFv-Fc construct (± SEM, n = 5–8) (b) RSV-F antigen binding of dMAb. RSV-F binding signal of serum samples from treated (squares) and naïve (triangles) mice (± SEM, n = 4) (c) In vitro neutralization of RSV-A virus. Neutralization titer of serum samples from treated (squares) or naïve (triangles) mice (log2 serum dilution of 60% reduction of plaque-formation; ±SEM, n = 3–11, dotted line indicates LOD at serum-dilution of 1/20) (d) Concentration of scFv-Fc RSV-F dMAb in BAL samples 7 days after RSV-dMAb pDNA delivery in treated (squares) or naïve (triangles) mice (mol scFv-Fc dMAb per gram total protein in lavage sample, n(naïve) = 2, n(RSV-F dMAb) = 3).
Figure 4.(a) Local expression of dMAb demonstrated by Immuno-fluorescence staining of RSV-F dMAb in cotton rat TA muscle tissue 7 days after delivery of 400 µg RSV-F dMAb pDNA to the tissue site (DAPI – blue; RSV-F dMAb – green; sectioned perpendicular to myocytes) (b) Levels of RSV-F dMAb (ng/ml) was measured for 39 days after IM administration of 800 µg dMAb-plasmid (±SEM, n = 5). (c) Virus neutralization function of in-vivo expressed RSV-F dMAb. Serum samples were harvested and tested 7 days after delivery of 2.4 mg scFv-Fc dMAb-pDNA: neutralizing titer (±SEM, dotted line indicates LOD at serum-dilution of 1/20). (d) Concentration of RSV-F dMAb in BAL samples from treated cotton rats.
Figure 5.(a) Schematic of cotton rat challenge study: Animals were treated with 2.4 mg RSV-dMAb 7 days before challenge or with an IM injection of 15 mg/kg Palivizumab 1 day before challenge (b) Viral load of cotton rat lung tissue (pfu/g) harvested 5 days after intra-nasal live virus challenge with RSV/A/long (± SEM n = 4–5) (i). RSV Nonstructural protein-1 (NS-1) mRNA levels (log2 and normalized to beta-Actin) of cotton rat lung tissue 5 days after intra-nasal live virus challenge with RSV/A/long (± SEM, n = 4–5, Mann–Whitney non-parametric t-test: p (untreated vs RSV-dMAb) = 0.0159; p (untreated vs Palivizumab) = 0.0079) (ii). (c) Serum levels of Palivizumab and scFv-Fc RSV-F dMAb in cotton rats at the day of challenge (day 0) and 5 days after challenge (± SEM, n = 4–5).