| Literature DB >> 32543985 |
Kohei Yamazaki1, Takashige Kashimoto1, Takehiro Kado1, Yukihiro Akeda2, Kazuki Yoshioka3, Toshio Kodama4, Mai Yamamoto5, Masashi Okamura6, Tsutomu Kakuda7, Shunji Ueno1.
Abstract
Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTI) progress to severe necrosis and result in fatal sepsis within a short time. Vibrio vulnificus is a causative agent and can spread from the initial infection site through soft tissue finally to the systemic circulation of the host. The motility and chemotaxis of this bacterium are essential for proliferation and lethality in a murine model of the infection, but their role in pathogenicity has not been characterized. In this study, we revealed the roles of motility and chemotaxis during the process of V. vulnificus infection. We compared a nonmotile mutant and two nonchemotactic mutants with their parent strain (WT) with regard to bacterial spread using an in vivo imaging system (IVIS) and invasion by detection of bacteria from the muscle and spleen of a murine infection model. WT rapidly spread throughout the infected thigh and invaded deep muscle causing severe tissue damage. The detection rate in the systemic circulation and the lethality were high. On the other hand, the nonmotile mutant stayed at the inoculation site, and the nonchemotactic mutants spread only slowly through the soft tissue of the infected thigh. Detection in the systemic circulation, the degree of tissue damage, and the lethality of nonchemotactic mutants were significantly reduced in mice compared with WT. This study demonstrated that chemotaxis is essential for invasion from the infection site to the deep and distant tissues and the main pathogenic factor for the rapid progression leading to sepsis in V. vulnificus NSTI.Entities:
Keywords: Vibrio vulnificus ; chemotaxis; in vivo imaging; mouse model; necrotizing soft tissue infection; pathogenic factor
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32543985 PMCID: PMC7550010 DOI: 10.1080/21505594.2020.1782707
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Virulence ISSN: 2150-5594 Impact factor: 5.882
Figure 1.Phenotypic differences in swimming motility and swarming motility without affecting virulence factors.
Figure 2.Chemotaxis-based spread through subcutaneous tissue. The luminescence signal of WT, ΔpomA, ΔcheY, Q93R, and pcheY detected by IVIS during 6 h time course.
Figure 3.Chemotaxis-based invasion to muscle tissue.
Figure 4.The tissue damage due to bacterial spread through soft tissue in V. vulnificus NSTI.
Figure 5.Invasion to the systemic circulation causing fatal outcomes.
Phenotypes in the motility of ΔpomA, ΔcheY, and Q93R, the number of detections from spleen at the two-time points, and the number of dead mice after infection.
| Strains | swimming phenotype (in liquid media) | swarming phenotype (on semi-solid media) | Systemic Dissemination 12 h.p.i. | Systemic Dissemination 24 h.p.i. | Death |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Δ | non-swimming | non-swarming | 0/6 | 0/12 | 0/12 |
| Δ | smooth bias | non-swarming | 4/6 | 10/12 | 4/12 |
| Q93R | turn (tumble) bias | intermediate phenotype compared to WT | 2/6 | 0/12 | 0/12 |
Abbreviation: h.p.i., hours post-infection