Literature DB >> 32543805

New Method of Destroying Waste Anesthetic Gases Using Gas-Phase Photochemistry.

Verena Rauchenwald1, Mark D Rollins2, Susan M Ryan3, Alex Voronov4, John R Feiner3, Karolis Šarka1, Matthew S Johnson1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The inhalation anesthetics are potent greenhouse gases. To reduce the global environmental impact of the health care sector, technologies are sought to limit the release of waste anesthetic gas into the atmosphere.
METHODS: Using a photochemical exhaust gas destruction system, removal efficiencies for nitrous oxide, desflurane, and sevoflurane were measured at various inlet concentrations (25% and 50%; 1.5%, 3.0%, and 6.0%; and 0.5%, 1.0%, and 2.0%, respectively) with flow rates ranging from 0.25 to 2.0 L/min. To evaluate the economic competitiveness of the anesthetic waste gas destruction system, its price per ton of carbon dioxide equivalent was calculated and compared to other greenhouse gas abatement technologies and current market prices.
RESULTS: All inhaled anesthetics evaluated demonstrate enhanced removal efficiencies with decreasing flow rates (P < .0001). Depending on the anesthetic and its concentration, the photochemical exhaust gas destruction system exhibits a constant first-order removal rate, k. However, there was not a simple relation between the removal rate k and the species concentration. The costs for removing a ton of carbon dioxide equivalents are <$0.005 for desflurane, <$0.114 for sevoflurane, and <$49 for nitrous oxide.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on this prototype study, destroying sevoflurane and desflurane with this photochemical anesthetic waste gas destruction system design is efficient and cost-effective. This is likely also true for other halogenated inhalational anesthetics such as isoflurane. Due to differing chemistry of nitrous oxide, modifications of this prototype photochemical reactor system are necessary to improve its removal efficiency for this gas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32543805     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  6 in total

1.  Reduction of greenhouse gases emission through the use of tiletamine and zolazepam.

Authors:  Sonia Lachowska; Agnieszka Antończyk; Joanna Tunikowska; Martyna Godniak; Zdzisław Kiełbowicz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Environmental and Occupational Considerations of Anesthesia: A Narrative Review and Update.

Authors:  Shane Varughese; Raza Ahmed
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Reactivity and kinetics of 1,3-butadiene under ultraviolet irradiation at 254 nm.

Authors:  Min Liang; Chang Yu; Suyi Dai; Haijun Cheng; Weiguang Li; Fang Lai; Li Ma; Xiongmin Liu
Journal:  BMC Chem       Date:  2022-02-18

Review 4.  Building sustainable and resilient surgical systems: A narrative review of opportunities to integrate climate change into national surgical planning in the Western Pacific region.

Authors:  Rennie X Qin; Lotta Velin; Elizabeth F Yates; Omnia El Omrani; Elizabeth McLeod; Jemesa Tudravu; Lubna Samad; Alistair Woodward; Craig D McClain
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health West Pac       Date:  2022-02-23

5.  Action guidance for addressing pollution from inhalational anaesthetics.

Authors:  J A Devlin-Hegedus; F McGain; R D Harris; J D Sherman
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 12.893

Review 6.  Environmental sustainability in anaesthesia and critical care.

Authors:  Forbes McGain; Jane Muret; Cathy Lawson; Jodi D Sherman
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 9.166

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.