| Literature DB >> 32543662 |
Yutong Kang1, Hao Zhang1, Meina Hu1, Yao Ma1, Pengfei Chen1, Zelin Zhao1, Jinyang Li1, Yuee Ye1, Meiqin Zheng1,1, Yongliang Lou1.
Abstract
Purpose: Corneal ulcers are a common eye inflammatory disease that can cause visual impairment or even blindness if not treated promptly. Ocular trauma is a major risk factor for corneal ulcers, and corneal trauma in agricultural work can rapidly progress to corneal ulcers. This study aims to evaluate the changes in the ocular surface (OS) microbiome of patients with traumatic corneal ulcer (TCU).Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32543662 PMCID: PMC7415308 DOI: 10.1167/iovs.61.6.35
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci ISSN: 0146-0404 Impact factor: 4.799
Features of Subjects and Summary of the Metagenomic Sequencing Data
| Feature | TCU ( | HC ( |
|---|---|---|
| No. of samples | 22 | 20 |
| Age, y | 56.7 ± 7.8 | 56.4 ± 8.2 |
| Male/female | 14/8 | 13/7 |
| Average no. of total reads | 162, 231, 216 | 81, 168, 170 |
| Average no. of nonhuman reads passed filter | 4, 483, 517 | 2, 163, 406 |
TCU, traumatic corneal ulcer; HC, healthy control; data are the mean ± SD.
Figure 1.Alpha and beta diversity of microbiota. The distribution of kingdom and major phylum. Average abundance (%) of kingdom from microbiomes of HC group (A) and TCU group (B). Alpha diversity measured by the Shannon diversity index (C) and Simpson index (D), Student's t-test. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plots of beta diversity based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarities (E) and the Jaccard index (F) according to disease status. The P values were generated by the PERMANOVA test with 999 permutations. (G) Major phyla, less abundant (< 1%) and unclassified taxa are grouped together as “other.” Biomarker phyla (H) and differential phyla (I) in each group are depicted. HC, healthy control; TCU, traumatic corneal ulcer.
Figure 2.Major genera in ocular microbiota of patients with TCU and healthy subjects. (A) Major genera, less abundant (< 1%) and unclassified taxa are grouped together as “other.” Biomarker genera (B) and differential genera (C) are depicted. (D) Bubble chart showing the relative abundances of major genera (> 1%) in the ocular microbiomes of HC subjects and patients with TCU.
Figure 3.The distribution and differences of the top 20 species between the HC group and TCU group. (A) Chordal graph of the top 20 species between the HC group and TCU group. (B) Histogram of unique differential species in each group. (C) The MeanDecreaseAccuracy and MeanDecreaseGini of all differential species were calculated by the random forest algorithm.
Figure 4.Microbial correlation based on relative abundance. Interaction network in the OS microbiome of HC subjects (A) and patients with TCU (B) (Spearman correlation magnitude > 0.4 and q < 0.05 are shown). Each node represents a genus (relative abundance > 0.5% in at least one group), and the size of the nodes is proportional to their degree of interaction. The co-abundance (positive correlation) and co-exclusion (negative correlation) are indicated by green and red connections, respectively.
Figure 5.KEGG functional pathways of the OS microbiome. PCOA plots of Bray–Curtis dissimilarities (A) and Jaccard index (B) in which samples were colored based on grouping. (C) The relative abundances of 53 KEGG functional pathways were significantly different in the TCU group and in the HC group.