| Literature DB >> 32543457 |
Hasan Baig1, Pedro Fontanarrosa2, Vishwesh Kulkarni3, James McLaughlin4, Prashant Vaidyanathan5, Bryan Bartley6, Swapnil Bhatia7, Shyam Bhakta8, Michael Bissell9, Kevin Clancy10, Robert Sidney Cox11, Angel Goñi Moreno4, Thomas Gorochowski12, Raik Grunberg13, Augustin Luna14, Curtis Madsen7, Goksel Misirli15, Tramy Nguyen6, Nicolas Le Novere16, Zachary Palchick17, Matthew Pocock18, Nicholas Roehner6, Herbert Sauro19, James Scott-Brown20, John T Sexton8, Guy-Bart Stan21, Jeffrey J Tabor8, Marta Vazquez Vilar22, Christopher A Voigt23, Anil Wipat4, David Zong8, Zach Zundel2, Jacob Beal6, Chris Myers2.
Abstract
People who are engineering biological organisms often find it useful to communicate in diagrams, both about the structure of the nucleic acid sequences that they are engineering and about the functional relationships between sequence features and other molecular species. Some typical practices and conventions have begun to emerge for such diagrams. The Synthetic Biology Open Language Visual (SBOL Visual) has been developed as a standard for organizing and systematizing such conventions in order to produce a coherent language for expressing the structure and function of genetic designs. This document details version 2.2 of SBOL Visual, which builds on the prior SBOL Visual 2.1 in several ways. First, the grounding of molecular species glyphs is changed from BioPAX to SBO, aligning with the use of SBO terms for interaction glyphs. Second, new glyphs are added for proteins, introns, and polypeptide regions (e. g., protein domains), the prior recommended macromolecule glyph is deprecated in favor of its alternative, and small polygons are introduced as alternative glyphs for simple chemicals.Entities:
Keywords: SBOL visual; diagrams; standards
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32543457 PMCID: PMC7756616 DOI: 10.1515/jib-2020-0014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Integr Bioinform ISSN: 1613-4516