Literature DB >> 32543080

Trigonal-sparing versus trigonal-involved Botox injection for treatment of idiopathic overactive bladder: A randomized clinical trial.

Ahmed S El-Hefnawy1, Mohamed A Elbaset1, Diaa-Eldin Taha2, Bassem S Wadie1, Mahmoud Kenawy1, Ahmed A Shokeir1, Mohamed E Badry3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate safety and efficacy of trigone-involved Botox injections in comparison with trigone-sparing injections in refractory idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and three patients randomly received a 100-IU intradetrusal injection of Botox either sparing the trigone (52 patients) or involving the trigone (51 patients). Patients were prospectively evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months. Efficacy was evaluated by 3-day voiding diaries, OAB symptom score (OABSS), and pressure flow study. Any complications were recorded. An ascending cystogram was done at 3 months for detection of vesicoureteral reflux. Urinary tract infection (UTI) was estimated on urine culture basis. Primary outcome was the difference of total OABSS at 3 months.
RESULTS: The mean age ± SD was 34.3 ± 10 years (range 18-59 years). There was a reduction of episodes of all components of OAB in both groups in comparison with baseline by the end of the study but without significant difference between both groups. The trigonal-sparing group had less score of frequency compared with the trigonal-involved group throughout the study period (P < .05). There was no difference in OABSS at 3 months (1.5 ± 0.4 vs 1.6 ± 0.3, P .875). Two patients in the trigonal-involved group out of 51 (3.9%) were in need of clean intermittent catheterization because of voiding difficulty and a postvoid residual > 200 mL. There was a higher rate of UTI in the trigonal-involved group ranging from 5.6% up to 11.7% at each follow-up visit. No patient had reflux.
CONCLUSION: Trigone injections are not superior to trigone-sparing injections. On the contrary, the incidence of UTI and voiding difficulty were higher. The concept of reflux induced by trigonal injection has not been proven.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Botox; neuropathic bladder; overactive bladder; prospective randomized trial

Year:  2020        PMID: 32543080     DOI: 10.1111/luts.12321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Low Urin Tract Symptoms        ISSN: 1757-5664            Impact factor:   1.592


  2 in total

1.  Trigonal-Sparing vs. Trigonal-Involved OnabotulinumtoxinA Injection for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yuanshan Cui; Tong Cai; Tiantian Dong; Xiaoyi Zhang; Zhongbao Zhou; Youyi Lu; Yong Zhang; Jitao Wu; Zhenli Gao; Yongqiang Wang; Liying Dong
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 2.  Recent advances in managing overactive bladder.

Authors:  George Araklitis; Georgina Baines; Ana Sofia da Silva; Dudley Robinson; Linda Cardozo
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2020-09-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.