Literature DB >> 32542176

Automated in vivo Assessment of Vascular Response to Radiation using a Hybrid Theranostic X-ray Irradiator/Fluorescence Molecular Imaging System.

Farouk Nouizi1, Jamison Brooks2,3, Darren M Zuro2,3, Srideshikan Sargur Madabushi2, Dayson Moreira4, Marcin Kortylewski4, Jerry Froelich5, Lydia M Su1, Gultekin Gulsen1, Susanta K Hui2.   

Abstract

Hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy treatments (SBRT) have demonstrated impressive results for the treatment of a variety of solid tumors. The role of tumor supporting vasculature damage in treatment outcome for SBRT has been intensely debated and studied. Fast, non-invasive, longitudinal assessments of tumor vasculature would allow for thorough investigations of vascular changes correlated with SBRT treatment response. In this paper, we present a novel theranostic system which incorporates a fluorescence molecular imager into a commercial, preclinical, microCT-guided, irradiator and was designed to quantify tumor vascular response (TVR) to targeted radiotherapy. This system overcomes the limitations of single-timepoint imaging modalities by longitudinally assessing spatiotemporal differences in intravenously-injected ICG kinetics in tumors before and after high-dose radiation. Changes in ICG kinetics were rapidly quantified by principle component (PC) analysis before and two days after 10 Gy targeted tumor irradiation. A classifier algorithm based on PC data clustering identified pixels with TVR. Results show that two days after treatment, a significant delay in ICG clearance as measured by exponential decay (40.5±16.1% P=0.0405 Paired t-test n=4) was observed. Changes in the mean normalized first and second PC feature pixel values (PC1 & PC2) were found (P=0.0559, 0.0432 paired t-test), suggesting PC based analysis accurately detects changes in ICG kinetics. The PC based classification algorithm yielded spatially-resolved TVR maps. Our first-of-its-kind theranostic system, allowing automated assessment of TVR to SBRT, will be used to better understand the role of tumor perfusion in metastasis and local control.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fluorescence Molecular Imaging; Pharmacokinetics; Preclinical Imaging; Principal Component Analysis; Radiation Therapy; Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Treatments; Theranostics; Tumor Vascular Response

Year:  2020        PMID: 32542176      PMCID: PMC7295127          DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.2994943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Access        ISSN: 2169-3536            Impact factor:   3.367


  48 in total

1.  Is indirect cell death involved in response of tumors to stereotactic radiosurgery and stereotactic body radiation therapy?

Authors:  Chang W Song; Inhwan Park; L Chinsoo Cho; Jianling Yuan; Kathryn E Dusenbery; Robert J Griffin; Seymour H Levitt
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 2.  The tumor radiobiology of SRS and SBRT: are more than the 5 Rs involved?

Authors:  J Martin Brown; David J Carlson; David J Brenner
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Comparative analysis of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in a syngeneic mouse model of oral cancer.

Authors:  Nancy P Judd; Clint T Allen; Ashley E Winkler; Ravindra Uppaluri
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  Quantitative relationships of intravascular tumor cells, tumor vessels, and pulmonary metastases following tumor implantation.

Authors:  L A Liotta; J Kleinerman; G M Saidel
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Continuous, hyperfractionated, accelerated radiotherapy (CHART) versus conventional radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: mature data from the randomised multicentre trial. CHART Steering committee.

Authors:  M Saunders; S Dische; A Barrett; A Harvey; G Griffiths; M Palmar
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Mobilization of viable tumor cells into the circulation during radiation therapy.

Authors:  Olga A Martin; Robin L Anderson; Prudence A Russell; R Ashley Cox; Alesia Ivashkevich; Agnieszka Swierczak; Judy P Doherty; Daphne H M Jacobs; Jai Smith; Shankar Siva; Patricia E Daly; David L Ball; Roger F Martin; Michael P MacManus
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Single-dose radiotherapy disables tumor cell homologous recombination via ischemia/reperfusion injury.

Authors:  Sahra Bodo; Cécile Campagne; Tin Htwe Thin; Daniel S Higginson; H Alberto Vargas; Guoqiang Hua; John D Fuller; Ellen Ackerstaff; James Russell; Zhigang Zhang; Stefan Klingler; HyungJoon Cho; Matthew G Kaag; Yousef Mazaheri; Andreas Rimner; Katia Manova-Todorova; Boris Epel; Joan Zatcky; Cristian R Cleary; Shyam S Rao; Yoshiya Yamada; Michael J Zelefsky; Howard J Halpern; Jason A Koutcher; Carlos Cordon-Cardo; Carlo Greco; Adriana Haimovitz-Friedman; Evis Sala; Simon N Powell; Richard Kolesnick; Zvi Fuks
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging in Humans with Indocyanine Green: A Review and Update.

Authors:  Milton V Marshall; John C Rasmussen; I-Chih Tan; Melissa B Aldrich; Kristen E Adams; Xuejuan Wang; Caroline E Fife; Erik A Maus; Latisha A Smith; Eva M Sevick-Muraca
Journal:  Open Surg Oncol J       Date:  2010

Review 9.  Micro-CT of rodents: state-of-the-art and future perspectives.

Authors:  D P Clark; C T Badea
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 2.685

10.  Principal component analysis of dynamic fluorescence images for diagnosis of diabetic vasculopathy.

Authors:  Jihye Seo; Yuri An; Jungsul Lee; Taeyun Ku; Yujung Kang; Chulwoo Ahn; Chulhee Choi
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 3.170

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.