Literature DB >> 32541981

[Subnational inequalities of early marriage and fertility among Chinese females from 1990 to 2010].

D M Luo1, X J Yan1, P J Hu1, J S Zhang1, Y Song1, J Ma1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the inequality of early marriage and adolescent fertility with respect to local economic development among Chinese females aged 15-19 years from 1990 to 2010.
METHODS: Aggregated data were extracted from the Chinese National Census from 1990 to 2010. We calculated the ever-married rate and fertility rate of female adolescents aged 15-19 years. Using gross domestic product (GDP) per capita as an indicator for socio-economic status of a province, we calculated the slope index of inequality (SII) and the concentration index (CI) to analyze the subnational inequalities of early marriage and adolescent fertility. Weighted linear regression models were also established to assess the associations between GDP per capita and the ever-married rate/fertility rate.
RESULTS: The ever-married rate for Chinese female adolescents aged 15-19 years decreased from 4.7% in 1990 to 1.2% in 2000, and rebounded to 2.1% in 2010. From 1990 to 2000, the fertility rate decreased from 22.0 per 1 000 to 6.0 per 1 000, and further decreased to 5.9 per 1 000 in 2010. In 1990, the socio-economic inequalities of the ever-married rate and fertility rate for female adolescents aged 15-19 years were not statistically significant (P for SII or CI>0.05). The values of SII revealed that, in 2000 and 2010, female adolescents with the lowest GDP per capita had an ever-married rate 2.4% (95%CI: 0.4-4.4) and 2.3% (95%CI: 0.3-4.2) higher than those with the highest GDP per capita, respectively. In the meantime, in 2000 and 2010, female adolescents with the lowest GDP per capita had a fertility rate 12.9 per 1 000 (95%CI: 5.4-20.5) and 9.3 per 1 000 (95%CI: 4.6-14.0) higher than those with the highest, respectively. In 2000 and 2010, the CIs for marriage were -0.32 (P=0.02) and -0.17 (P=0.03), respectively, and the CIs for childbirth were -0.37 (P<0.01) and -0.26 (P<0.01), respectively. In 2000, the ever-married rate and the fertility rate were estimated to increase by 1.4% (95%CI: 0.1-2.7) and 7.9 per 1 000 (95%CI: 2.9-12.8) with 100% increase in GDP per capita, respectively; in 2010, the numbers were 1.5% (95%CI: 0.1-2.9) and 6.7 per 1 000 (95%CI: 3.2-10.1), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Subnational socio-economic inequality of early marriage and adolescent fertility existed in 2000 and 2010. Female adolescents residing in less-developed areas were more likely to engage in early marriage and childbirth. Reducing income inequality and increasing education investment for poverty-stricken areas seem to be effective measures to reduce this inequality.

Keywords:  Adolescent fertility; Early marriage; Inequality; Subnational economic development

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32541981      PMCID: PMC7433423          DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.03.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban        ISSN: 1671-167X


  17 in total

1.  Skewed sex ratios at birth and future marriage squeeze in China and India, 2005-2100.

Authors:  Christophe Z Guilmoto
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2012-02

2.  Adolescence and the social determinants of health.

Authors:  Russell M Viner; Elizabeth M Ozer; Simon Denny; Michael Marmot; Michael Resnick; Adesegun Fatusi; Candace Currie
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  China's Below-Replacement Fertility: Recent Trends and Future Prospects.

Authors:  S Philip Morgan; Guo Zhigang; Sarah R Hayford
Journal:  Popul Dev Rev       Date:  2009-09-09

4.  The bounds of the concentration index when the variable of interest is binary, with an application to immunization inequality.

Authors:  Adam Wagstaff
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 5.  Measuring the magnitude of socio-economic inequalities in health: an overview of available measures illustrated with two examples from Europe.

Authors:  J P Mackenbach; A E Kunst
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Marriage Squeeze, Never-Married Proportion, and Mean Age at First Marriage in China.

Authors:  Quanbao Jiang; Marcus W Feldman; Shuzhuo Li
Journal:  Popul Res Policy Rev       Date:  2013-04-30

7.  Global Trends in Adolescent Fertility, 1990-2012, in Relation to National Wealth, Income Inequalities, and Educational Expenditures.

Authors:  John S Santelli; Xiaoyu Song; Samantha Garbers; Vinit Sharma; Russell M Viner
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 5.012

8.  Social, biological, and programmatic factors linking adolescent pregnancy and early childhood undernutrition: a path analysis of India's 2016 National Family and Health Survey.

Authors:  Phuong Hong Nguyen; Samuel Scott; Sumanta Neupane; Lan Mai Tran; Purnima Menon
Journal:  Lancet Child Adolesc Health       Date:  2019-05-16

9.  Progress in adolescent health and wellbeing: tracking 12 headline indicators for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2016.

Authors:  Peter S Azzopardi; Stephen J C Hearps; Kate L Francis; Elissa C Kennedy; Ali H Mokdad; Nicholas J Kassebaum; Stephen Lim; Caleb M S Irvine; Theo Vos; Alex D Brown; Surabhi Dogra; Stuart A Kinner; Natasha S Kaoma; Mariam Naguib; Nicola J Reavley; Jennifer Requejo; John S Santelli; Susan M Sawyer; Vegard Skirbekk; Marleen Temmerman; Jordan Tewhaiti-Smith; Joseph L Ward; Russell M Viner; George C Patton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Systematic assessment of the sex ratio at birth for all countries and estimation of national imbalances and regional reference levels.

Authors:  Fengqing Chao; Patrick Gerland; Alex R Cook; Leontine Alkema
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.