| Literature DB >> 32541885 |
Xiaoqiang Peng1,2,3, Pengpeng Yang1,2,3, Kun Dai1,2,3, Yong Chen1,2,3, Xiaochun Chen1,2,3, Wei Zhuang1,2,3, Hanjie Ying4,5,6,7, Jinglan Wu8,9,10.
Abstract
A series of methylamine-modified hyper-cross-linked resins were fabricated from chloromethylated polystrene-co-divinylbenzene by two continuous reactions (Friedel-Crafts alkylation and amination). The BET surface area and pore volume of the as-prepared resins took a positive correlation to the reaction time and temperature during alkylation reaction while lessened during amination process. When running batch adsorption experiments for adsorption of citric acid, the methylamine-modified resin named HM-65-2 showed higher adsorption capacity of 136.3 mg/g and selectivity of 6.98 (citric/glucose) than the precursor resins. The pseudo-second-order rate model fitted better than the pseudo-first-order model, implying the adsorption sites distributed on the resins surface tended to be heterogeneous. Subsequently, the interactions between citric acid and the resin were investigated by means of molecular simulation. Simulation result showed the addition of nitrogen-containing groups significantly enhanced the adsorption performance of citric acid. Lastly, the dynamic column experiments were performed to obtain the suitable operating conditions for the citric acid adsorption.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32541885 PMCID: PMC7295785 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-66592-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Literatures list of citric acid adsorption by some typical adsorbents.
| Name of adsorbents | Type of adsorbents | Adsorption capacity of citric acid (mg/g) |
|---|---|---|
| 330 resin | Weakly basic ion exchange resin | 76.4810[ |
| Amberlite IRA-67 | Weakly basic ion exchange resin | 316.1[ |
| XAD-16 | Macroporous resin | 126.72[ |
| / | Hydroxyapatite | 19.296[ |
| RCM | Chitosan microsphere | 77.0[ |
Figure 1Synthetic procedure of the methylamine-modified hyper-cross-linked resins.
Figure 2Infrared spectra of (a) hyper-cross-linked resins unmodified under different parameters, (b) hyper-cross-linked resins modified by methyamine under different parameters.
Figure 3(a) Adsorption capacity of citric acid and (b) the selectivity of citric acid.
Figure 4Complexes of (a) the CA-unmodified resin and (b) CA-methylamine-modified resin.
Calculated interaction energy of (a) the CA-unmodified resin and (b) CA-methylamine-modified resin.
| ECA (×106 kJ/mol) | Eresin (×106 kJ/mol) | ETotal (×106 kJ/mol) | ΔE (kJ/mol) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (a) | −2.107 | −0.757 | −2.864 | −170.7 |
| (b) | −2.107 | −1.019 | −3.130 | −3396.0 |
Figure 5The adsorption isotherm (a: Langmuir model and b: Freundlich model) of citric acid adsorbed on HM-65-2-1 resin from aqueous solution at 298 K, 308 K, 318 K, respectively.
Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm-model parameters of citric acid onto the HM-65-2 resin.
| T(K) | Freundlich | Langmuir | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KF | n | R2 | a | b | R2 | |
| 298 | 13.79 | 1.923 | 0.9914 | 5.987 | 179.5 | 0.9912 |
| 308 | 11.54 | 1.922 | 0.9926 | 5.072 | 149.5 | 0.9758 |
| 318 | 10.73 | 1.946 | 0.9948 | 4.690 | 134.4 | 0.9709 |
Thermodynamic parameters of citric acid adsorbed onto the HM-65-2 resin.
| T (K) | KC | ΔG (kJ/mol) | ΔH (kJ/mol) | ΔS (J.mol−1.K−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 298 | 2.027 | −1.751 | −7.792 | 20.35 |
| 308 | 1.813 | −1.524 | ||
| 318 | 1.663 | −1.345 |
Figure 6The adsorption kinetic curve of citric acid adsorbed on HM-65-2-1 resin from aqueous solution at 298 K, 308 K, 318 K, respectively.
Figure 7Linear correlations of different models fitting adsorption kinetic data: (a) pseudo-first-order model; (b) pseudo-second-order model; (c) Weber-Morris model.
Coefficients of the pseudo-first-order model and pseudo-second-order models at different temperatures.
| T(K) | Pseudo-first-order model | Pseudo-second-order model | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| qe(mg/g) | K1(min−1) | R2 | qe(mg/g) | K2(g.mg−1.min−1) | R2 | |
| 298 | 65.38 | 0.1270 | 0.8782 | 171.8 | 0.007496 | 0.9983 |
| 308 | 41.84 | 0.1064 | 0.5991 | 166.7 | 0.01241 | 0.9987 |
| 318 | 30.53 | 0.1032 | 0.5971 | 161.6 | 0.01733 | 0.9999 |
Coefficients of Weber-Morris model at different temperatures.
| T(K) | 298 | 308 | 318 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters | K1’(mg.g−1.min−1/2) | 84.99 | 92.47 | 95.84 |
| R2 | 0.9927 | 0.9948 | 0.9956 | |
| K2’(mg.g−1.min−1/2) | 22.98 | 20.45 | 15.59 | |
| R2 | 0.8625 | 0.8297 | 0.6620 | |
| K3’(mg.g−1.min−1/2) | 1.147 | −0.01889 | −0.1046 | |
| R2 | 0.4927 | 0.3999 | 0.7391 |
Figure 8Breakthrough curves for citric acid adsorption on the fixed-bed column at different parameters (a) Different flow rate; (b) Different injection concentration; (c) Different column height; (d) Different column inner diameter.