Literature DB >> 32541372

An Assessment of Clinical and System Drivers of Family Satisfaction in the PICU.

Kevin Hummel1,2, Angela P Presson1,3, Morgan M Millar3, Gitte Larsen1,2, Howard Kadish4, Lenora M Olson1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Investigate clinical and system drivers of family satisfaction in the PICU.
DESIGN: Mixed methods qualitative and quantitative (observational) study. Qualitative interviews with families were performed as a pilot to inform modality of survey distribution based on family preferences. A validated pediatric satisfaction survey deployed to family members for 7 months with a corresponding chart review and administrative data collection.
SETTING: PICU in a tertiary children's hospital. PATIENTS: Two hundred six families of patients admitted to the PICU more than 48 hours.
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Families preferred surveys distributed electronically on a tablet in the PICU setting. The Pediatric Family Satisfaction-ICU survey was used to assess comfort with medical decision-making and communication with the care team. Capture rate of all eligible patients was 69.5% and response rate was 90.8%. Overall, 64.7% of respondents were highly satisfied, whereas over one third were not highly satisfied; families of Hispanic ethnicity (odds ratio of lower satisfaction of families with Hispanic ethnicity: 2.09; 95% CI, 1.01-4.33; p = 0.047) and high social stressors (odds ratio of higher satisfaction among high stressed subgroup: 0.49; 95% CI, 0.24-0.99; p = 0.047) reported statistically significant lower satisfaction. Additional free-text responses were identified in 21% of respondents, with the majority of comments indicating wishes for improvements clustered around communication with the medical team or sleeping environment of families and patients.
CONCLUSIONS: High capture rates of family satisfaction in the PICU can be obtained with a PICU-specific survey, limiting barriers to completion by including family preferences, and distributing in the PICU setting. Less than two-third of PICU families are highly satisfied; patients of Hispanic ethnicity and those with high social stressors predict low satisfaction, whereas illness severity, age, and PICU length of stay did not have statistical significance. Local improvement teams can use this approach to drive enhanced satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32541372      PMCID: PMC7836021          DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1529-7535            Impact factor:   3.971


  32 in total

Review 1.  Parent satisfaction in pediatric intensive care: a critical appraisal of the literature.

Authors:  Jos M Latour; Jan A Hazelzet; Albert J van der Heijden
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.624

2.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  The patient experience and health outcomes.

Authors:  Matthew P Manary; William Boulding; Richard Staelin; Seth W Glickman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Psychometric assessment of the Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit questionnaire in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  David A Harrison; Paloma Ferrando-Vivas; Stephen E Wright; Elaine McColl; Daren K Heyland; Kathryn M Rowan
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 3.425

5.  The parent perspective: "being a good parent" when making critical decisions in the PICU.

Authors:  Tessie W October; Kiondra R Fisher; Chris Feudtner; Pamela S Hinds
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.624

6.  Pediatric medical complexity algorithm: a new method to stratify children by medical complexity.

Authors:  Tamara D Simon; Mary Lawrence Cawthon; Susan Stanford; Jean Popalisky; Dorothy Lyons; Peter Woodcox; Margaret Hood; Alex Y Chen; Rita Mangione-Smith
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Effects of survey mode, patient mix, and nonresponse on CAHPS hospital survey scores.

Authors:  Marc N Elliott; Alan M Zaslavsky; Elizabeth Goldstein; William Lehrman; Katrin Hambarsoomians; Megan K Beckett; Laura Giordano
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 8.  Family-centered care in the pediatric intensive care unit.

Authors:  Kathleen L Meert; Jeff Clark; Susan Eggly
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.278

9.  PICU Length of Stay: Factors Associated With Bed Utilization and Development of a Benchmarking Model.

Authors:  Murray M Pollack; Richard Holubkov; Ron Reeder; J Michael Dean; Kathleen L Meert; Robert A Berg; Christopher J L Newth; John T Berger; Rick E Harrison; Joseph Carcillo; Heidi Dalton; David L Wessel; Tammara L Jenkins; Robert Tamburro
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 3.624

10.  Satisfaction with quality of ICU care for patients and families: the euroQ2 project.

Authors:  Hanne Irene Jensen; Rik T Gerritsen; Matty Koopmans; Lois Downey; Ruth A Engelberg; J Randall Curtis; Peter E Spronk; Jan G Zijlstra; Helle Ørding
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  2 in total

1.  Use of Patient-Reported Experience Measures in Pediatric Care: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sumedh Bele; Lorynn Teela; Muning Zhang; Sarah Rabi; Sadia Ahmed; Hedy Aline van Oers; Elizabeth Gibbons; Nicole Dunnewold; Lotte Haverman; Maria J Santana
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 3.418

2.  Analyzing clinical and system drivers of satisfaction in the intensive care unit as a component of high quality care.

Authors:  Kevin Hummel; Zhining Ou; Avani Latchireddi; Angela P Presson; Joseph Tonna
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 2.210

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.