Michael Dombrowski1, Jessica L Illuzzi, Uma M Reddy, Heather S Lipkind, Henry C Lee, Haiqun Lin, Lisbet S Lundsberg, Xiao Xu. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri; the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; the Division of Neonatal & Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; and the Division of Nursing Science, Rutgers University School of Nursing, Newark, New Jersey.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Trial of labor after cesarean delivery has been mostly studied in the setting of one prior cesarean delivery; controversy remains regarding the risks and benefits of trial of labor for women with two prior cesarean deliveries. This study aimed to examine utilization, success rate, and maternal and neonatal outcomes of trial of labor in this population. METHODS: Using linked hospital discharge and birth certificate data, we retrospectively analyzed a cohort of mothers with nonanomalous, term, singleton live births in California between 2010-2012 and had two prior cesarean deliveries and no clear contraindications for trial of labor. We measured whether they attempted labor and, if so, whether they delivered vaginally. Association of patient and hospital characteristics with the likelihood of attempting labor and successful vaginal birth was examined using multivariable regressions. We compared composite severe maternal morbidities and composite severe newborn complications in those who underwent trial of labor as opposed to planned cesarean delivery using a propensity score-matching approach. RESULTS: Among 42,771 women who met sample eligibility criteria, 1,228 (2.9%) attempted labor, of whom 484 (39.4%) delivered vaginally. There was no significant difference in the risk of composite severe maternal morbidities, but there was a modest increase in the risk of composite severe newborn complications among women who attempted labor compared with those who did not (2.0% vs 1.4%, P=.04). After accounting for differences in patient and hospital characteristics, propensity score-matched analysis showed no significant association between trial of labor and the risk of composite severe maternal morbidities (odds ratio [OR] 1.16, 95% CI 0.70-1.91), but trial of labor was associated with a higher risk for the composite of severe newborn complications (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.04-3.04). CONCLUSION: Among women with two prior cesarean deliveries, trial of labor was rarely attempted and was successful in 39.4% of attempts. Trial of labor in this population was associated with a modest increase in severe neonatal morbidity.
OBJECTIVE: Trial of labor after cesarean delivery has been mostly studied in the setting of one prior cesarean delivery; controversy remains regarding the risks and benefits of trial of labor for women with two prior cesarean deliveries. This study aimed to examine utilization, success rate, and maternal and neonatal outcomes of trial of labor in this population. METHODS: Using linked hospital discharge and birth certificate data, we retrospectively analyzed a cohort of mothers with nonanomalous, term, singleton live births in California between 2010-2012 and had two prior cesarean deliveries and no clear contraindications for trial of labor. We measured whether they attempted labor and, if so, whether they delivered vaginally. Association of patient and hospital characteristics with the likelihood of attempting labor and successful vaginal birth was examined using multivariable regressions. We compared composite severe maternal morbidities and composite severe newborn complications in those who underwent trial of labor as opposed to planned cesarean delivery using a propensity score-matching approach. RESULTS: Among 42,771 women who met sample eligibility criteria, 1,228 (2.9%) attempted labor, of whom 484 (39.4%) delivered vaginally. There was no significant difference in the risk of composite severe maternal morbidities, but there was a modest increase in the risk of composite severe newborn complications among women who attempted labor compared with those who did not (2.0% vs 1.4%, P=.04). After accounting for differences in patient and hospital characteristics, propensity score-matched analysis showed no significant association between trial of labor and the risk of composite severe maternal morbidities (odds ratio [OR] 1.16, 95% CI 0.70-1.91), but trial of labor was associated with a higher risk for the composite of severe newborn complications (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.04-3.04). CONCLUSION: Among women with two prior cesarean deliveries, trial of labor was rarely attempted and was successful in 39.4% of attempts. Trial of labor in this population was associated with a modest increase in severe neonatal morbidity.
Authors: George A Macones; Alison Cahill; Emmanuelle Pare; David M Stamilio; Sarah Ratcliffe; Erika Stevens; Mary Sammel; Jeffrey Peipert Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Mark B Landon; Catherine Y Spong; Elizabeth Thom; John C Hauth; Steven L Bloom; Michael W Varner; Atef H Moawad; Steve N Caritis; Margaret Harper; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Marshall Carpenter; Alan M Peaceman; Mary J O'sullivan; Baha M Sibai; Oded Langer; John M Thorp; Susan M Ramin; Brian M Mercer; Steven G Gabbe Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Robert M Silver; Mark B Landon; Dwight J Rouse; Kenneth J Leveno; Catherine Y Spong; Elizabeth A Thom; Atef H Moawad; Steve N Caritis; Margaret Harper; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Marshall Carpenter; Alan M Peaceman; Mary J O'Sullivan; Baha Sibai; Oded Langer; John M Thorp; Susan M Ramin; Brian M Mercer Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Xiao Xu; Henry C Lee; Haiqun Lin; Lisbet S Lundsberg; Katherine H Campbell; Heather S Lipkind; Christian M Pettker; Jessica L Illuzzi Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2018-09-29 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Lisbet S Lundsberg; Elliott K Main; Henry C Lee; Haiqun Lin; Jessica L Illuzzi; Xiao Xu Journal: J Midwifery Womens Health Date: 2019-09-10 Impact factor: 2.388