| Literature DB >> 32541057 |
Pam Ten Broeke1, Merlijn Olthof2, Debby G J Beckers2, Nicola D Hopkins3, Lee E F Graves3, Sophie E Carter3,4, Madeleine Cochrane3,5, David Gavin3, Abigail S Morris3,6, Anna Lichtwarck-Aschoff2, Sabine A E Geurts2, Dick H J Thijssen3,7, Erik Bijleveld2.
Abstract
Sitting for prolonged periods of time impairs people's health. Prior research has mainly investigated sitting behavior on an aggregate level, for example, by analyzing total sitting time per day. By contrast, taking a dynamic approach, here we conceptualize sitting behavior as a continuous chain of sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit transitions. We use multilevel time-to-event analysis to analyze the timing of these transitions. We analyze ∼30,000 objectively measured posture transitions from 156 people during work time. Results indicate that the temporal dynamics of sit-to-stand transitions differ from stand-to-sit transitions, and that people are quicker to switch postures later in the workday, and quicker to stand up after having been more active in the recent hours. We found no evidence for associations with physical fitness. Altogether, these findings provide insights into the origins of people's stand-up and sit-down decisions, show that sitting behavior is fundamentally different from exercise behavior, and provide pointers for the development of interventions.Entities:
Keywords: fatigue; occupational health; sedentary behavior; survival analysis; time-to-event analysis
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32541057 PMCID: PMC7334445 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2001284117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205