Literature DB >> 32540950

Multi-trait Genome-Wide Analyses of the Brain Imaging Phenotypes in UK Biobank.

Chong Wu1.   

Abstract

Many genetic variants identified in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are associated with multiple, sometimes seemingly unrelated, traits. This motivates multi-trait association analyses, which have successfully identified novel associated loci for many complex diseases. While appealing, most existing methods focus on analyzing a relatively small number of traits, and may yield inflated Type 1 error rates when a large number of traits need to be analyzed jointly. As deep phenotyping data are becoming rapidly available, we develop a novel method, referred to as aMAT (adaptive multi-trait association test), for multi-trait analysis of any number of traits. We applied aMAT to GWAS summary statistics for a set of 58 volumetric imaging derived phenotypes from the UK Biobank. aMAT had a genomic inflation factor of 1.04, indicating the Type 1 error rate was well controlled. More important, aMAT identified 24 distinct risk loci, 13 of which were ignored by standard GWAS. In comparison, the competing methods either had a suspicious genomic inflation factor or identified much fewer risk loci. Finally, four additional sets of traits have been analyzed and provided similar conclusions.
Copyright © 2020 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GWAS summary data; adaptive test; deep phenotyping data; multivariate trait; statistical power

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32540950      PMCID: PMC7404235          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.120.303242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  33 in total

1.  ChromHMM: automating chromatin-state discovery and characterization.

Authors:  Jason Ernst; Manolis Kellis
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  Approximately independent linkage disequilibrium blocks in human populations.

Authors:  Tomaz Berisa; Joseph K Pickrell
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Integrate multiple traits to detect novel trait-gene association using GWAS summary data with an adaptive test approach.

Authors:  Bin Guo; Baolin Wu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Genetic Variant Set-Based Tests Using the Generalized Berk-Jones Statistic with Application to a Genome-Wide Association Study of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Ryan Sun; Xihong Lin
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 5.033

5.  A general framework for estimating the relative pathogenicity of human genetic variants.

Authors:  Martin Kircher; Daniela M Witten; Preti Jain; Brian J O'Roak; Gregory M Cooper; Jay Shendure
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2014-02-02       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Functional mapping and annotation of genetic associations with FUMA.

Authors:  Kyoko Watanabe; Erdogan Taskesen; Arjen van Bochoven; Danielle Posthuma
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  The NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog of published genome-wide association studies, targeted arrays and summary statistics 2019.

Authors:  Annalisa Buniello; Jacqueline A L MacArthur; Maria Cerezo; Laura W Harris; James Hayhurst; Cinzia Malangone; Aoife McMahon; Joannella Morales; Edward Mountjoy; Elliot Sollis; Daniel Suveges; Olga Vrousgou; Patricia L Whetzel; Ridwan Amode; Jose A Guillen; Harpreet S Riat; Stephen J Trevanion; Peggy Hall; Heather Junkins; Paul Flicek; Tony Burdett; Lucia A Hindorff; Fiona Cunningham; Helen Parkinson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes.

Authors:  Anshul Kundaje; Wouter Meuleman; Jason Ernst; Misha Bilenky; Angela Yen; Alireza Heravi-Moussavi; Pouya Kheradpour; Zhizhuo Zhang; Jianrong Wang; Michael J Ziller; Viren Amin; John W Whitaker; Matthew D Schultz; Lucas D Ward; Abhishek Sarkar; Gerald Quon; Richard S Sandstrom; Matthew L Eaton; Yi-Chieh Wu; Andreas R Pfenning; Xinchen Wang; Melina Claussnitzer; Yaping Liu; Cristian Coarfa; R Alan Harris; Noam Shoresh; Charles B Epstein; Elizabeta Gjoneska; Danny Leung; Wei Xie; R David Hawkins; Ryan Lister; Chibo Hong; Philippe Gascard; Andrew J Mungall; Richard Moore; Eric Chuah; Angela Tam; Theresa K Canfield; R Scott Hansen; Rajinder Kaul; Peter J Sabo; Mukul S Bansal; Annaick Carles; Jesse R Dixon; Kai-How Farh; Soheil Feizi; Rosa Karlic; Ah-Ram Kim; Ashwinikumar Kulkarni; Daofeng Li; Rebecca Lowdon; GiNell Elliott; Tim R Mercer; Shane J Neph; Vitor Onuchic; Paz Polak; Nisha Rajagopal; Pradipta Ray; Richard C Sallari; Kyle T Siebenthall; Nicholas A Sinnott-Armstrong; Michael Stevens; Robert E Thurman; Jie Wu; Bo Zhang; Xin Zhou; Arthur E Beaudet; Laurie A Boyer; Philip L De Jager; Peggy J Farnham; Susan J Fisher; David Haussler; Steven J M Jones; Wei Li; Marco A Marra; Michael T McManus; Shamil Sunyaev; James A Thomson; Thea D Tlsty; Li-Huei Tsai; Wei Wang; Robert A Waterland; Michael Q Zhang; Lisa H Chadwick; Bradley E Bernstein; Joseph F Costello; Joseph R Ecker; Martin Hirst; Alexander Meissner; Aleksandar Milosavljevic; Bing Ren; John A Stamatoyannopoulos; Ting Wang; Manolis Kellis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 69.504

9.  Brain scans from 21,297 individuals reveal the genetic architecture of hippocampal subfield volumes.

Authors:  Dennis van der Meer; Jaroslav Rokicki; Tobias Kaufmann; Aldo Córdova-Palomera; Torgeir Moberget; Dag Alnæs; Francesco Bettella; Oleksandr Frei; Nhat Trung Doan; Ida E Sønderby; Olav B Smeland; Ingrid Agartz; Alessandro Bertolino; Janita Bralten; Christine L Brandt; Jan K Buitelaar; Srdjan Djurovic; Marjolein van Donkelaar; Erlend S Dørum; Thomas Espeseth; Stephen V Faraone; Guillén Fernández; Simon E Fisher; Barbara Franke; Beathe Haatveit; Catharina A Hartman; Pieter J Hoekstra; Asta K Håberg; Erik G Jönsson; Knut K Kolskår; Stephanie Le Hellard; Martina J Lund; Astri J Lundervold; Arvid Lundervold; Ingrid Melle; Jennifer Monereo Sánchez; Linn C Norbom; Jan E Nordvik; Lars Nyberg; Jaap Oosterlaan; Marco Papalino; Andreas Papassotiropoulos; Giulio Pergola; Dominique J F de Quervain; Geneviève Richard; Anne-Marthe Sanders; Pierluigi Selvaggi; Elena Shumskaya; Vidar M Steen; Siren Tønnesen; Kristine M Ulrichsen; Marcel P Zwiers; Ole A Andreassen; Lars T Westlye
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 15.992

10.  The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data.

Authors:  Clare Bycroft; Colin Freeman; Desislava Petkova; Gavin Band; Lloyd T Elliott; Kevin Sharp; Allan Motyer; Damjan Vukcevic; Olivier Delaneau; Jared O'Connell; Adrian Cortes; Samantha Welsh; Alan Young; Mark Effingham; Gil McVean; Stephen Leslie; Naomi Allen; Peter Donnelly; Jonathan Marchini
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of adaptive multiple phenotype association tests using summary statistics in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Colleen M Sitlani; Antoine R Baldassari; Heather M Highland; Chani J Hodonsky; Barbara McKnight; Christy L Avery
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 6.150

2.  Gene-based association tests using GWAS summary statistics and incorporating eQTL.

Authors:  Xuewei Cao; Xuexia Wang; Shuanglin Zhang; Qiuying Sha
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.