Marcelo V Negrao1, Victoria M Raymond2, Richard B Lanman2, Jacqulyne P Robichaux1, Junqin He1, Monique B Nilsson1, Patrick K S Ng3, Bianca E Amador3, Emily B Roarty1, Rebecca J Nagy2, Kimberly C Banks2, Viola W Zhu4, Chun Ng5, Young Kwang Chae6, Jeffrey M Clarke7, Jeffrey A Crawford8, Funda Meric-Bernstam3, Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou4, David R Gandara9, John V Heymach1, Trever G Bivona10, Caroline E McCoach11. 1. Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 2. Guardant Health, Redwood City, California. 3. Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 4. Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California Irvine, Orange, California. 5. Kaiser Permanente, Stockton, California. 6. Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. 7. Duke Cancer Center, Raleigh, Durham, North Calorina. 8. Duke Cancer Institute, Raleigh, Durham, North Calorina. 9. Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, California. 10. Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California. 11. Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California. Electronic address: caroline.mccoach@ucsf.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Approximately 4% of NSCLC harbor BRAF mutations, and approximately 50% of these are non-V600 mutations. Treatment of tumors harboring non-V600 mutations is challenging because of functional heterogeneity and lack of knowledge regarding their clinical significance and response to targeted agents. METHODS: We conducted an integrative analysis of BRAF non-V600 mutations using genomic profiles of BRAF-mutant NSCLC from the Guardant360 database. BRAF mutations were categorized by clonality and class (1 and 2: RAS-independent; 3: RAS-dependent). Cell viability assays were performed in Ba/F3 models. Drug screens were performed in NSCLC cell lines. RESULTS: A total of 305 unique BRAF mutations were identified. Missense mutations were most common (276, 90%), and 45% were variants of unknown significance. F468S and N581Y were identified as novel activating mutations. Class 1 to 3 mutations had higher clonality than mutations of unknown class (p < 0.01). Three patients were treated with MEK with or without BRAF inhibitors. Patients harboring G469V and D594G mutations did not respond, whereas a patient with the L597R mutation had a durable response. Trametinib with or without dabrafenib, LXH254, and lifirafenib had more potent inhibition of BRAF non-V600-mutant NSCLC cell lines than other MEK, BRAF, and ERK inhibitors, comparable with the inhibition of BRAF V600E cell line. CONCLUSIONS: In BRAF-mutant NSCLC, clonality is higher in known functional mutations and may allow identification of variants of unknown significance that are more likely to be oncogenic drivers. Our data indicate that certain non-V600 mutations are responsive to MEK and BRAF inhibitors. This integration of genomic profiling and drug sensitivity may guide the treatment for BRAF-mutant NSCLC.
INTRODUCTION: Approximately 4% of NSCLC harbor BRAF mutations, and approximately 50% of these are non-V600 mutations. Treatment of tumors harboring non-V600 mutations is challenging because of functional heterogeneity and lack of knowledge regarding their clinical significance and response to targeted agents. METHODS: We conducted an integrative analysis of BRAF non-V600 mutations using genomic profiles of BRAF-mutant NSCLC from the Guardant360 database. BRAF mutations were categorized by clonality and class (1 and 2: RAS-independent; 3: RAS-dependent). Cell viability assays were performed in Ba/F3 models. Drug screens were performed in NSCLC cell lines. RESULTS: A total of 305 unique BRAF mutations were identified. Missense mutations were most common (276, 90%), and 45% were variants of unknown significance. F468S and N581Y were identified as novel activating mutations. Class 1 to 3 mutations had higher clonality than mutations of unknown class (p < 0.01). Three patients were treated with MEK with or without BRAF inhibitors. Patients harboring G469V and D594G mutations did not respond, whereas a patient with the L597R mutation had a durable response. Trametinib with or without dabrafenib, LXH254, and lifirafenib had more potent inhibition of BRAF non-V600-mutant NSCLC cell lines than other MEK, BRAF, and ERK inhibitors, comparable with the inhibition of BRAF V600E cell line. CONCLUSIONS: In BRAF-mutant NSCLC, clonality is higher in known functional mutations and may allow identification of variants of unknown significance that are more likely to be oncogenic drivers. Our data indicate that certain non-V600 mutations are responsive to MEK and BRAF inhibitors. This integration of genomic profiling and drug sensitivity may guide the treatment for BRAF-mutant NSCLC.
Authors: Caroline E McCoach; Collin M Blakely; Kimberly C Banks; Benjamin Levy; Ben M Chue; Victoria M Raymond; Anh T Le; Christine E Lee; Joseph Diaz; Saiama N Waqar; William T Purcell; Dara L Aisner; Kurtis D Davies; Richard B Lanman; Alice T Shaw; Robert C Doebele Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-03-29 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Emmet J Jordan; Hyunjae R Kim; Maria E Arcila; David Barron; Debyani Chakravarty; JianJiong Gao; Matthew T Chang; Andy Ni; Ritika Kundra; Philip Jonsson; Gowtham Jayakumaran; Sizhi Paul Gao; Hannah C Johnsen; Aphrothiti J Hanrahan; Ahmet Zehir; Natasha Rekhtman; Michelle S Ginsberg; Bob T Li; Helena A Yu; Paul K Paik; Alexander Drilon; Matthew D Hellmann; Dalicia N Reales; Ryma Benayed; Valerie W Rusch; Mark G Kris; Jamie E Chaft; José Baselga; Barry S Taylor; Nikolaus Schultz; Charles M Rudin; David M Hyman; Michael F Berger; David B Solit; Marc Ladanyi; Gregory J Riely Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2017-03-23 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Ross A Okimoto; Luping Lin; Victor Olivas; Elton Chan; Evan Markegard; Andrey Rymar; Dana Neel; Xiao Chen; Golzar Hemmati; Gideon Bollag; Trever G Bivona Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-11-09 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Yuri Sheikine; Dean Pavlick; Samuel J Klempner; Sally E Trabucco; Jon H Chung; Mark Rosenzweig; Kai Wang; Vamsidhar Velcheti; Garrett M Frampton; Nir Peled; Molly Murray; Young Kwang Chae; Lee A Albacker; Laurie Gay; Hatim Husain; James H Suh; Sherri Z Millis; Venkataprasanth P Reddy; Julia A Elvin; Ryan J Hartmaier; Afshin Dowlati; Phil Stephens; Jeffrey S Ross; Trever G Bivona; Vincent A Miller; Shridar Ganesan; Alexa B Schrock; Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou; Siraj M Ali Journal: JCO Precis Oncol Date: 2018-04-19
Authors: Luping Lin; Saurabh Asthana; Elton Chan; Sourav Bandyopadhyay; Maria M Martins; Victor Olivas; Jenny Jiacheng Yan; Luu Pham; Mingxue Michelle Wang; Gideon Bollag; David B Solit; Eric A Collisson; Charles M Rudin; Barry S Taylor; Trever G Bivona Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-02-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Moriah H Nissan; Christine A Pratilas; Alexis M Jones; Ricardo Ramirez; Helen Won; Cailian Liu; Shakuntala Tiwari; Li Kong; Aphrothiti J Hanrahan; Zhan Yao; Taha Merghoub; Antoni Ribas; Paul B Chapman; Rona Yaeger; Barry S Taylor; Nikolaus Schultz; Michael F Berger; Neal Rosen; David B Solit Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2014-02-27 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Oliver A Zill; Kimberly C Banks; Stephen R Fairclough; Stefanie A Mortimer; James V Vowles; Reza Mokhtari; David R Gandara; Philip C Mack; Justin I Odegaard; Rebecca J Nagy; Arthur M Baca; Helmy Eltoukhy; Darya I Chudova; Richard B Lanman; AmirAli Talasaz Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-05-18 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Alice T Shaw; Mark M Awad; Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack; Pablo Martinez; Beow Y Yeap; Chiara Ambrogio; Lorin A Ferris; Christine Lydon; Tom Nguyen; Nicholas A Jessop; A John Iafrate; Bruce E Johnson; Jochen K Lennerz Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-09-17 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Helen Davies; Graham R Bignell; Charles Cox; Philip Stephens; Sarah Edkins; Sheila Clegg; Jon Teague; Hayley Woffendin; Mathew J Garnett; William Bottomley; Neil Davis; Ed Dicks; Rebecca Ewing; Yvonne Floyd; Kristian Gray; Sarah Hall; Rachel Hawes; Jaime Hughes; Vivian Kosmidou; Andrew Menzies; Catherine Mould; Adrian Parker; Claire Stevens; Stephen Watt; Steven Hooper; Rebecca Wilson; Hiran Jayatilake; Barry A Gusterson; Colin Cooper; Janet Shipley; Darren Hargrave; Katherine Pritchard-Jones; Norman Maitland; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Gregory J Riggins; Darell D Bigner; Giuseppe Palmieri; Antonio Cossu; Adrienne Flanagan; Andrew Nicholson; Judy W C Ho; Suet Y Leung; Siu T Yuen; Barbara L Weber; Hilliard F Seigler; Timothy L Darrow; Hugh Paterson; Richard Marais; Christopher J Marshall; Richard Wooster; Michael R Stratton; P Andrew Futreal Journal: Nature Date: 2002-06-09 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: René J Boosman; Jacobus A Burgers; Egbert F Smit; Neeltje Steeghs; Anthonie J van der Wekken; Jos H Beijnen; Alwin D R Huitema; Rob Ter Heine Journal: Drugs Date: 2021-12-11 Impact factor: 9.546
Authors: Yonina R Murciano-Goroff; Terry Pak; Sebastian Mondaca; Jessica R Flynn; Joseph Montecalvo; Natasha Rekhtman; Darragh Halpenny; Andrew J Plodkowski; Stephanie L Wu; Mark G Kris; Paul K Paik; Gregory J Riely; Helena A Yu; Charles M Rudin; Matthew D Hellmann; Josiah D Land; Larry W Buie; Glenn Heller; Piro Lito; Rona Yaeger; Alexander Drilon; Dazhi Liu; Bob T Li; Michael Offin Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2021-12-28 Impact factor: 9.075
Authors: Dennis M Bjorklund; R Marc L Morgan; Jasmeen Oberoi; Katie L I M Day; Panagiota A Galliou; Chrisostomos Prodromou Journal: Biomolecules Date: 2022-06-28