Literature DB >> 32540229

Threshold for Computer- and Robot-Assisted Knee and Hip Replacements in the English National Health Service.

Edward Burn1, Daniel Prieto-Alhambra2, Thomas W Hamilton1, James A Kennedy1, David W Murray3, Rafael Pinedo-Villanueva1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To estimate threshold prices for computer- and robot-assisted knee and hip replacement.
METHODS: A lifetime cohort Markov model provided the framework for analysis. Linked primary care and inpatient hospital records informed estimates of outcomes under current practice. Outcomes were estimated under a range of hypothetical relative improvements in quality of life if unrevised and in revision risk after computer or robot-assisted surgery. Threshold prices, a price at which the net health benefit from funding the intervention would be zero, for these improvements were estimated for a cost-effectiveness threshold of £20 000 per additional quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained.
RESULTS: For average patient profiles under current knee and hip replacement practice, lifetime QALYs were 10.3 (9.9 to 10.7) and 11.0 (10.6 to 11.4), with costs of £6060 (£5947 to £6203) and £6506 (£6335 to £6710) for knee and hip replacement, respectively. A combined 50% relative reduction in risk of revision and 5% improvement in postoperative quality of life if unrevised would, for example, result in QALYs increasing to 10.9 (10.4 to 11.3) and 11.6 (11.2 to 12.0), and costs falling to £5880 (£5816 to £5956) and £6258 (£6149 to £6376) after knee and hip replacement, respectively. These particular improvements would have an associated threshold price of £11 182 (£10 691 to £11 721) for knee replacement and £12 134 (£11 616 to £12 701) for hip replacement. The 50% reduction in revision rate alone would have associated threshold prices of £1094 (£788 to £1488) and £1347 (£961 to £1842), and the 5% improvement in quality of life alone would have associated threshold prices of £9911 (£9476 to £10 296) and £10 578 (£10 171 to £10 982).
CONCLUSIONS: At current prices, computer- and robot-assisted knee and hip replacement will likely need to lead to improvements in patient-reported outcomes in addition to any reduction in the risk revision.
Copyright © 2020 ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cost-effectiveness; economic evaluation; hip replacement; knee replacement; quality of life

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32540229     DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.11.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  3 in total

1.  Advances and innovations in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Andreas Fontalis; Jean-Alain Epinette; Martin Thaler; Luigi Zagra; Vikas Khanduja; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2021-04-12

2.  A Cost-Utility Analysis of Robotic Arm-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty: Using Robotic Data from the Private Sector and Manual Data from the National Health Service.

Authors:  N D Clement; P Gaston; D F Hamilton; A Bell; P Simpson; G J Macpherson; J T Patton
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2022-02-27

3.  Arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle and stressed hip-knee-ankle angle: equivalent methods for estimating constitutional lower limb alignment in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Payam Tarassoli; Jil A Wood; Darren B Chen; Will Griffiths-Jones; Johan Bellemans; Samuel J MacDessi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 4.114

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.