| Literature DB >> 32539801 |
Abir Al-Rumhi1, Zainab Al-Hashami1, Salama Al-Hamidhi1, Amal Gadalla1, Raeece Naeem2, Lisa Ranford-Cartwright3, Arnab Pain2,4,5, Ali A Sultan6, Hamza A Babiker7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Successful control programs have impeded local malaria transmission in almost all Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries: Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Saudi Arabia. Nevertheless, a prodigious influx of imported malaria via migrant workers sustains the threat of local transmission. Here we examine the origin of imported malaria in Qatar, assess genetic diversity and the prevalence of drug resistance genes in imported Plasmodium falciparum, and finally, address the potential for the reintroduction of local transmission.Entities:
Keywords: Gametocytes; Gulf cooperation council (GCC) countries; Imported malaria; Malaria elimination; P. falciparum; Qatar
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32539801 PMCID: PMC7296620 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-020-05111-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Origin of imported malaria cases in Qatar between 2013 and 2016. The percentage values in brackets represent the proportion of one species originating from the country listed. The information on the originating country of the expatriates was obtained in response to the questionnaire and may not reflect all countries through which the individual travelled prior to arrival in Qatar
| Country | Origin | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Indian Subcontinent | India | 148 (46.5%) | 18 (15.3%) | 2 |
| Pakistan | 104 (32.7%) | 4 (3.4%) | 0 | |
| Sri Lanka | 0 | 1 (0.8%) | 0 | |
| Nepal | 12 (3.8%) | 1 (0.8%) | 0 | |
| Africa | Mauritania | 1 (0.3%) | 0 | 0 |
| Sudan | 34 (10.7%) | 36 (30.5%) | 4 | |
| Kenya | 3 (0.9%) | 16 (13.6%) | 3 | |
| Nigeria | 3 (0.9%) | 11 (9.3%) | 2 | |
| Eritrea | 5 (1.6%) | 10 (8.5%) | 1 | |
| Ethiopia | 5 (1.6%) | 3 (2.5%) | 0 | |
| Ghana | 1 (0.3%) | 3 (2.5%) | 0 | |
| Rwanda | 0 | 2 (1.7%) | 0 | |
| Cameroon | 0 | 2 (1.7%) | 0 | |
| Tanzania | 1 (0.3%) | 1 (0.8%) | 0 | |
| Djibouti | 0 | 1 (0.8%) | 0 | |
| Democratic Republic of Congo | 0 | 1 (0.8%) | 0 | |
| Republic of Ivory Coast | 0 | 1 (0.8%) | 0 | |
| Chad | 0 | 1 (0.8%) | 0 | |
| Othersa | Romania | 0 | 1 (0.8%) | 0 |
| USA | 0 | 1 (0.8%) | 0 | |
| Syria | 0 | 1 (0.8%) | 0 | |
| Qatar | 0 | 1 (0.8%) | 0 | |
| Saudi Arabia | 0 | 1 (0.8%) | 0 | |
| Spain | 0 | 1(0.8%) | 0 | |
| Canada | 1(0.3%) | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 318 | 118 | 12 |
Othersa: Reported by patients who have been on a visit to malaria-endemic countries
Fig. 1Correlation between total parasite density with both early gametocyte and late gametocyte density. a log total parasitaemia (X axis) and log early gametocyte density (Y axis), the fit line in scatter plot shows a weak/non-significant correlation coefficient (r = 0.031, p = 0.835). b log total parasitaemia (X axis) and log late gametocyte density (Y axis), the fit line in scatter plot shows a weak/non-significant correlation coefficient (r = 0.008, p = 0.946)
Number of alleles and expected heterozygosity (He) at ten microsatellite loci within imported Plasmodium falciparum from the Indian Subcontinent and Africa
| Origin of isolates | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Indian Subcontinent ( | Alleles | 3 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.87 | 0.81 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.91 | 0.87 | 0.72 | 0.86 | ||
| Africa ( | Alleles | 7 | 5 | 18 | 10 | 10 | 11 | 9 | 13 | 6 | 10 |
| 0.48 | 0.58 | 0.93 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 0.85 | 0..76 | 0.83 |
Fig. 2Principal Co-ordinates Analysis (PCoA) of P. falciparum populations from two regions (the Indian Subcontinent [black square] and Africa [transparent rectangular]). Values within parenthesis after the coordinate number are the percentage of variation explained by the coordinate
Haplotypes of drug resistance genes, that exist at a prevalence of more than 5%, among imported P. falciparum cases in Qatar. Haplotypes are shown as amino acids (wild-type in normal case, substitutions in bold underlined)
| Locus | Genotype | Prevalence | the Indian subcontinent ( | Africa ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wild type | C72 K76 A220 Q271 N326 I356 R371 | 44% | 1(14%) | 30(48%) | 0.1233 | |
| Mutant | C72 K76 | 13% | 6(85%) | 33(52%) | ||
| Mutant | C/S72 | 5% | ||||
| Mutant | C72 K76 | 29% | ||||
| Wild type | N86 F184 F938 G968 D1246 | 39% | 4(57%) | 23(37%) | 0.4118 | |
| Mutant | N86 | 10% | 3(43%) | 43(68%) | ||
| Mutant | 30% | |||||
| Wild type | H136 T149 K189 N217 R255 E433G453 | 47% | 7(100%) | 26(41%) | 0.0036 | |
| Mutant | H136 T149 | 34% | 0(0%) | 37(59%) | ||
| Wild type | H191K202S437I876L1342F1390 K1466D1533 | 31% | 1(14%) | 21(33%) | 0.4201 | |
| Mutant | H191K202S437 | 6% | 6(86%) | 42(67%) | ||
| Mutant | H191K202S437 | 10% | ||||
| Mutant | 5% |