Talal Hilal1, Miguel Gonzalez-Velez2, Vinay Prasad3,4,5. 1. Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson. 2. Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona. 3. Knight Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland. 4. Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland. 5. Center for Health Care Ethics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Abstract
Importance: While there have been multiple assessments of clinical trials leading to anticancer drug approvals by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the cumulative percentage of approvals based on trials with a limitation remains uncertain. Objective: To assess the percentage of clinical trials with limitations in 4 domains-lack of randomization, lack of significant overall survival advantage, inappropriate use of crossover, and use of suboptimal control arms-that led to FDA approvals from June 30, 2014, to July 31, 2019. Design, Setting, and Participants: This observational analysis included all anticancer drug indications approved by the FDA from June 30, 2014, through July 31, 2019. All indications were investigated, and each clinical trial was evaluated for design, enrollment period, primary end points, and presence of a limitation in the domains of interest. The standard-of-care therapy was determined by evaluating the literature and published guidelines 1 year prior to the start of clinical trial enrollment. Crossover was examined and evaluated for optimal use. The percentage of approvals based on clinical trials with any or all limitations of interest was then calculated. Main Outcomes and Measures: Estimated percentage of clinical trials with limitations of interest that led to an anticancer drug marketing authorization by the FDA. Results: A total of 187 trials leading to 176 approvals for 75 distinct novel anticancer drugs by the FDA were evaluated. Sixty-four (34%) were single-arm clinical trials, and 123 (63%) were randomized clinical trials. A total of 125 (67%) had at least 1 limitation in the domains of interest; 60 of the 125 trials (48%) were randomized clinical trials. Of all 123 randomized clinical trials, 37 (30%) lacked overall survival benefit, 31 (25%) had a suboptimal control, and 17 (14%) used crossover inappropriately. Conclusions and Relevance: Two-thirds of cancer drugs are approved based on clinical trials with limitations in at least 1 of 4 essential domains. Efforts to minimize these limitations at the time of clinical trial design are essential to ensure that new anticancer drugs truly improve patient outcomes over current standards.
Importance: While there have been multiple assessments of clinical trials leading to anticancer drug approvals by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the cumulative percentage of approvals based on trials with a limitation remains uncertain. Objective: To assess the percentage of clinical trials with limitations in 4 domains-lack of randomization, lack of significant overall survival advantage, inappropriate use of crossover, and use of suboptimal control arms-that led to FDA approvals from June 30, 2014, to July 31, 2019. Design, Setting, and Participants: This observational analysis included all anticancer drug indications approved by the FDA from June 30, 2014, through July 31, 2019. All indications were investigated, and each clinical trial was evaluated for design, enrollment period, primary end points, and presence of a limitation in the domains of interest. The standard-of-care therapy was determined by evaluating the literature and published guidelines 1 year prior to the start of clinical trial enrollment. Crossover was examined and evaluated for optimal use. The percentage of approvals based on clinical trials with any or all limitations of interest was then calculated. Main Outcomes and Measures: Estimated percentage of clinical trials with limitations of interest that led to an anticancer drug marketing authorization by the FDA. Results: A total of 187 trials leading to 176 approvals for 75 distinct novel anticancer drugs by the FDA were evaluated. Sixty-four (34%) were single-arm clinical trials, and 123 (63%) were randomized clinical trials. A total of 125 (67%) had at least 1 limitation in the domains of interest; 60 of the 125 trials (48%) were randomized clinical trials. Of all 123 randomized clinical trials, 37 (30%) lacked overall survival benefit, 31 (25%) had a suboptimal control, and 17 (14%) used crossover inappropriately. Conclusions and Relevance: Two-thirds of cancer drugs are approved based on clinical trials with limitations in at least 1 of 4 essential domains. Efforts to minimize these limitations at the time of clinical trial design are essential to ensure that new anticancer drugs truly improve patient outcomes over current standards.
Authors: Ariadna Tibau; Consolación Molto; Maria Borrell; Joseph C Del Paggio; Agustí Barnadas; Christopher M Booth; Eitan Amir Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Jiaxi Zhou; Jonathon Vallejo; Paul Kluetz; Richard Pazdur; Tamy Kim; Patricia Keegan; Ann Farrell; Julia A Beaver; Rajeshwari Sridhara Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2019-05-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Tony S K Mok; Yi-Long Wu; Iveta Kudaba; Dariusz M Kowalski; Byoung Chul Cho; Hande Z Turna; Gilberto Castro; Vichien Srimuninnimit; Konstantin K Laktionov; Igor Bondarenko; Kaoru Kubota; Gregory M Lubiniecki; Jin Zhang; Debra Kush; Gilberto Lopes Journal: Lancet Date: 2019-04-04 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Xuanyi Li; Alicia Beeghly-Fadiel; Suresh K Bhavnani; Hossein Tavana; Samuel M Rubinstein; Bishal Gyawali; Irbaz Bin Riaz; H Deepika Fernandes; Jeremy L Warner Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-04-01