Mechelle M Lewis1,2, Elias Harkins1, Eun-Young Lee1, Christy Stetter3, Bethany Snyder1, Tyler Corson1, Guangwei Du1, Lan Kong3, Xuemei Huang1,2,4,5,6. 1. Department of Neurology, Pennsylvania State University Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA. 2. Department of Pharmacology, Pennsylvania State University Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA. 3. Department of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA. 4. Department of Radiology, Pennsylvania State University Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA. 5. Department of Neurosurgery, Pennsylvania State University Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA. 6. Department of Kinesiology, Pennsylvania State University Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVE: To synchronize data collection, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) recommended Common Data Elements (CDEs) for use in Parkinson's disease (PD) research. This study delineated the progression patterns of these CDEs in a cohort of PD patients. METHODS: One hundred-twenty-five PD patients participated in the PD Biomarker Program (PDBP) at Penn State. CDEs, including MDS-Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS)-total, questionnaire-based non-motor (-I) and motor (-II), and rater-based motor (-III) subscales; Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA); Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS); University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT); and PD Questionnaire (PDQ-39) were obtained at baseline and three annual follow-ups. Annual change was delineated for PD or subgroups [early = PDE, disease duration (DD) <1 y; middle = PDM, DD = 1-5 y; and late = PDL, DD > 5 y] using mixed effects model analyses. RESULTS: UPDRS-total, -II, and PDQ-39 scores increased significantly, and UPSIT decreased, whereas UPDRS-I, -III, MoCA, and HDRS did not change, over 36 months in the overall PD cohort. In the PDE subgroup, UPDRS-II increased and UPSIT decreased significantly, whereas MoCA and UPSIT decreased significantly in the PDM subgroup. In the PDL subgroup, UPDRS-II and PDQ-39 increased significantly. Other metrics within each individual subgroup did not change. Sensitivity analyses using subjects with complete data confirmed these findings. CONCLUSION: Among CDEs, UPDRS-total, -II, PDQ-39, and UPSIT all are sensitive metrics to track PD progression. Subgroup analyses revealed that these CDEs have distinct stage-dependent sensitivities, with UPSIT for DD < 5 y, PDQ-39 for DD > 5 y, UPDRS-II for early (DD < 1) or later stages (DD > 5).
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVE: To synchronize data collection, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) recommended Common Data Elements (CDEs) for use in Parkinson's disease (PD) research. This study delineated the progression patterns of these CDEs in a cohort of PDpatients. METHODS: One hundred-twenty-five PDpatients participated in the PD Biomarker Program (PDBP) at Penn State. CDEs, including MDS-Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS)-total, questionnaire-based non-motor (-I) and motor (-II), and rater-based motor (-III) subscales; Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA); Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS); University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT); and PD Questionnaire (PDQ-39) were obtained at baseline and three annual follow-ups. Annual change was delineated for PD or subgroups [early = PDE, disease duration (DD) <1 y; middle = PDM, DD = 1-5 y; and late = PDL, DD > 5 y] using mixed effects model analyses. RESULTS: UPDRS-total, -II, and PDQ-39 scores increased significantly, and UPSIT decreased, whereas UPDRS-I, -III, MoCA, and HDRS did not change, over 36 months in the overall PD cohort. In the PDE subgroup, UPDRS-II increased and UPSIT decreased significantly, whereas MoCA and UPSIT decreased significantly in the PDM subgroup. In the PDL subgroup, UPDRS-II and PDQ-39 increased significantly. Other metrics within each individual subgroup did not change. Sensitivity analyses using subjects with complete data confirmed these findings. CONCLUSION: Among CDEs, UPDRS-total, -II, PDQ-39, and UPSIT all are sensitive metrics to track PD progression. Subgroup analyses revealed that these CDEs have distinct stage-dependent sensitivities, with UPSIT for DD < 5 y, PDQ-39 for DD > 5 y, UPDRS-II for early (DD < 1) or later stages (DD > 5).
Entities:
Keywords:
Parkinson’s disease; clinical progression; common data elements; disease zzm321990stage
Authors: William J Marks; Raymond T Bartus; Joao Siffert; Charles S Davis; Andres Lozano; Nicholas Boulis; Jerrold Vitek; Mark Stacy; Dennis Turner; Leonard Verhagen; Roy Bakay; Raymond Watts; Barton Guthrie; Joseph Jankovic; Richard Simpson; Michele Tagliati; Ron Alterman; Matthew Stern; Gordon Baltuch; Philip A Starr; Paul S Larson; Jill L Ostrem; John Nutt; Karl Kieburtz; Jeffrey H Kordower; C Warren Olanow Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2010-10-20 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Ziad S Nasreddine; Natalie A Phillips; Valérie Bédirian; Simon Charbonneau; Victor Whitehead; Isabelle Collin; Jeffrey L Cummings; Howard Chertkow Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Anna Campabadal; Carme Uribe; Barbara Segura; Hugo C Baggio; Alexandra Abos; Anna Isabel Garcia-Diaz; Maria Jose Marti; Francesc Valldeoriola; Yaroslau Compta; Nuria Bargallo; Carme Junque Journal: Parkinsonism Relat Disord Date: 2017-05-10 Impact factor: 4.891
Authors: J G Nutt; K J Burchiel; C L Comella; J Jankovic; A E Lang; E R Laws; A M Lozano; R D Penn; R K Simpson; M Stacy; G F Wooten Journal: Neurology Date: 2003-01-14 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Claudia Trenkwalder; Bryan Kies; Monika Rudzinska; Jennifer Fine; Janos Nikl; Krystyna Honczarenko; Peter Dioszeghy; Dennis Hill; Tim Anderson; Vilho Myllyla; Jan Kassubek; Malcolm Steiger; Marco Zucconi; Eduardo Tolosa; Werner Poewe; Erwin Surmann; John Whitesides; Babak Boroojerdi; Kallol Ray Chaudhuri Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2010-11-18 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Feng Han; Gregory L Brown; Yalin Zhu; Aaron E Belkin-Rosen; Mechelle M Lewis; Guangwei Du; Yameng Gu; Paul J Eslinger; Richard B Mailman; Xuemei Huang; Xiao Liu Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2021-05-17 Impact factor: 9.698