| Literature DB >> 32538299 |
Tsheten Tsheten1,2, Archie C A Clements3,4, Darren J Gray1, Sonam Wangchuk2, Kinley Wangdi1.
Abstract
Dengue is an important emerging vector-borne disease in Bhutan. This study aimed to quantify the spatial and temporal patterns of dengue and their relationship to environmental factors in dengue-affected areas at the sub-district level. A multivariate zero-inflated Poisson regression model was developed using a Bayesian framework with spatial and spatiotemporal random effects modelled using a conditional autoregressive prior structure. The posterior parameters were estimated using Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation with Gibbs sampling. A total of 708 dengue cases were notified through national surveillance between January 2016 and June 2019. Individuals aged ≤14 years were found to be 53% (95% CrI: 42%, 62%) less likely to have dengue infection than those aged >14 years. Dengue cases increased by 63% (95% CrI: 49%, 77%) for a 1°C increase in maximum temperature, and decreased by 48% (95% CrI: 25%, 64%) for a one-unit increase in normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). There was significant residual spatial clustering after accounting for climate and environmental variables. The temporal trend was significantly higher than the national average in eastern sub-districts. The findings highlight the impact of climate and environmental variables on dengue transmission and suggests prioritizing high-risk areas for control strategies.Entities:
Keywords: Bayesian; Bhutan; Dengue; spatial; temporal
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32538299 PMCID: PMC7473275 DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1775497
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Microbes Infect ISSN: 2222-1751 Impact factor: 7.163
Figure 1.Administrative map of Bhutan and districts with documented dengue.
Distribution of monthly means of dengue fever cases and climate and environmental variables in Bhutan, January 2016–June 2019.
| Mean (Minimum–Maximum) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Districts | No. of sub-districts | Cases | Rainfall (mm) | Maximum temperature °C | Relative humidity (%) | NDVI |
| Chukha | 11 | 0.69 (0.00–72.00) | 11.52 (0.00–50.23) | 29.29 (23.61–32.73) | 71.30 (31.56–88.67) | 0.46 (−0.01–0.98) |
| Dagana | 14 | 0.01(0.00–3.00) | 2.55 (0.00–15.37) | 21.24 (11.32–26.50) | 66.71 (44.43–92.80) | 0.53 (0.01–0.95) |
| Pemagatshel | 11 | 0.01(0.00–1.00) | 3.52 (0.00–23.72) | 21.81 (14.48–26.56) | 82.60 (73.67–90.25) | 0.61 (0.02–0.91) |
| Samdrup Jongkhar | 11 | 0.43 (0.00–76.00) | 7.79 (0.00–30.02) | 25.41 (20.11–29.98) | 74.38 (47.74–93.51) | 0.47 (−0.01–0.88) |
| Samtse | 15 | 0.18 (0.00–40.00) | 12.62 (0.00–47.18) | 28.47 (21.40–32.08) | 71.00 (47.22–90.54) | 0.41 (−0.06–0.98) |
| Sarpang | 12 | 0.12 (0.00–13.00) | 12.58 (0.00–79.73) | 27.41 (21.60–33.60) | 80.20 (60.25–93.03) | 0.48 (−0.01–0.97) |
| Zhemgang | 8 | 0.02 (0.00–2.00) | 3.19 (0.00–19.01) | 20.29 (12.51–26.84) | 73.88 (54.74–89.64) | 0.56 (0.02–0.92) |
| Overall | 82 | 0.21(0.00–76.00) | 7.95 (0–79.73) | 25.08 (11.32–33.60) | 73.96 (31.56–93.51) | 0.51 (−0.06–0.98) |
Figure 2.Dengue incidence rates by sub-districts, Bhutan, 2016–2018
Figure 3.Raw standardized morbidity ratio of dengue by sub-districts in Bhutan, January 2016–June 2019
Figure 4.Temporal decomposition of numbers of dengue cases of Bhutan, January 2016–June 2019.
Regression coefficients, relative risk and 95% credible interval from Bayesian spatial and non-spatial models of dengue cases in Bhutan, January 2016-June 2019.
| Model/Variable | Coeff, posterior mean (95% CrI) | RR, posterior mean (95% CrI) |
|---|---|---|
| α (Intercept)a | −4.936 (−7.052, −3.481) | |
| Age (Above 14 years as base) | −0.752 (−969, −0.539) | 0.471 (0.379, 0.582) |
| Mean monthly trend | 1.023 (0.764, 1.325) | 2.782 (2.146, 3.762) |
| Rainfall lagged 2 months (mm) | 0.044 (−0.043, 0.132) | 1.036 (0.965, 1.113) |
| Relative humidity lagged 2 months (%) | 0.053 (−0.144, 0.252) | 1.004 (0.988, 1.021) |
| Maximum temperature without lag (°C) | 2.188 (1.824, 2.564) | 1.619 (1.495, 1.759) |
| NDVI lagged 1 month | −0.666 (−1.036, −0.305) | 0.514 (0.355, 0.737) |
| Probability of extra zero | 0.702 (0.641, 0.758) | 2.017 (1.898, 2.133) |
| Heterogeneitya | ||
| Unstructured | 0.112 (0.043, 0.221) | |
| Structured (trend) | 23.88 (1.101, 152.600) | |
| DIC | 1421.200 | |
| α (Intercept)a | −4.699 (−6.413, −3.368) | |
| Age (Above 14 years as base) | −0.752 (−1.208, −0.319) | 0.472 (0.298, 0.726) |
| Mean monthly trend | 1.041 (0.541, 1.546) | 2.832 (1.717, 4.693) |
| Rainfall lagged 2 months (mm) | 0.046 (−0.134, 0.224) | 1.038 (0.897, 1.199) |
| Relative humidity lagged 2 months (%) | 0.045 (−0.351, 0.439) | 1.004 (0.972, 1.036) |
| Maximum temperature without lag (°C) | 2.254 (1.270, 3.345) | 1.644 (1.323, 2.091) |
| NDVI lagged 1 month | −0.636 (−614, 0.283) | 0.529 (0.199, 1.328) |
| Probability of extra zero | 0.704 (0.629, 0.770) | 2.022 (1.878, 2.159) |
| Heterogeneitya | ||
| Structured (spatial) | 0.044 (0.735, 39.700) | |
| Structured (trend) | 7.048 (0.018, 0.086) | |
| DIC | 1529.61 | |
| α (Intercept)a | −4.779 (−6.764, −3.468) | |
| Age (Above 14 years as base) | −0.753 (−0.972, −0.540) | 0.471 (0.378, 0.582) |
| Mean monthly trend | 1.023 (0.758, 1.327) | 2.782 (2.133, 3.769) |
| Rainfall lagged 2 months (mm) | 0.045 (−0.043, 0.133) | 1.037 (0.966, 1.114) |
| Relative humidity lagged 2 months (%) | 0.050 (−0.151, 0.249) | 1.004 (0.988, 1.020) |
| Maximum temperature without lag (°C) | 2.199 (1.818, 2.596) | 1.625 (1.493, 1.772) |
| NDVI lagged 1 month | −0.663 (−1.040, −0.290) | 0.515 (0.353, 0.748) |
| Probability of extra zero | 0.703 (0.642, 0.759) | 2.019 (1.900, 2.135) |
| Heterogeneitya | ||
| Unstructured | 0.126 (0.047, 0.259) | |
| Structured (spatial) | 275.700 (0.593, 1843) | |
| Structured (trend) | 38.740 (1.142, 349.500) | |
| DIC | 1423.63 |
Abbreviations: coeff: coefficients; CrI: credible interval; RR-relative risk; DIC-deviance information criterion.
aCoefficient.
Figure 5.Spatial distribution of posterior means of structured (a) and unstructured random effects (b) in Bhutan, January 2016–June 2019 based on a Bayesian spatiotemporal model.
Figure 6.Trend analysis of dengue incidence in Bhutan, January 2016–June 2019, based on the spatiotemporal random effects of a Bayesian model.