Fotios Spyropoulos1, Sally H Vitali2, Marlin Touma3, Chase D Rose4, Carter R Petty5, Philip Levy4, Stella Kourembanas4, Helen Christou1. 1. Department of Pediatric Newborn Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 2. Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 3. University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 5. Institutional Centers for Clinical and Translational Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
Echocardiography is the gold standard non-invasive technique to diagnose pulmonary hypertension. It is also an important modality used to monitor disease progression and response to treatment in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Surprisingly, only few studies have been conducted to validate and standardize echocardiographic parameters in experimental animal models of pulmonary hypertension. We sought to define cut-off values for both invasive and non-invasive measures of pulmonary hemodynamics and right ventricular hypertrophy that would reliably diagnose pulmonary hypertension in three different rat models. The study was designed in two phases: (1) a derivation phase to establish the cut-off values for invasive measures of right ventricular systolic pressure, Fulton's index (right ventricular weight/left ventricle + septum weight), right ventricular to body weight ratio, and non-invasive echocardiographic measures of pulmonary arterial acceleration time, pulmonary arterial acceleration time to ejection time ratio and right ventricular wall thickness in diastole in the hypoxic and monocrotaline rat models of pulmonary hypertension and (2) a validation phase to test the performance of the cut-off values in predicting pulmonary hypertension in an independent cohort of rats with Sugen/hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension. Our study demonstrates that right ventricular systolic pressure ≥35.5 mmHg and Fulton's Index ≥0.34 are highly sensitive (>94%) and specific (>91%) cut-offs to distinguish animals with pulmonary hypertension from controls. When pulmonary arterial acceleration time/ejection time and right ventricular wall thickness in diastole were both measured, a result of either pulmonary arterial acceleration time/ejection time ≤0.25 or right ventricular wall thickness in diastole ≥1.03 mm detected right ventricular systolic pressure ≥35.5 mmHg or Fulton's Index ≥0.34 with a sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 100%. With properly validated non-invasive echocardiography measures of right ventricular performance in rats that accurately predict invasive measures of pulmonary hemodynamics, future studies can now utilize these markers to test the efficacy of different treatments with preclinical therapeutic modeling.
Echocardiography is the gold standard non-invasive technique to diagnose pulmonary hypertension. It is also an important modality used to monitor disease progression and response to treatment in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Surprisingly, only few studies have been conducted to validate and standardize echocardiographic parameters in experimental animal models of pulmonary hypertension. We sought to define cut-off values for both invasive and non-invasive measures of pulmonary hemodynamics and right ventricular hypertrophy that would reliably diagnose pulmonary hypertension in three different rat models. The study was designed in two phases: (1) a derivation phase to establish the cut-off values for invasive measures of right ventricular systolic pressure, Fulton's index (right ventricular weight/left ventricle + septum weight), right ventricular to body weight ratio, and non-invasive echocardiographic measures of pulmonary arterial acceleration time, pulmonary arterial acceleration time to ejection time ratio and right ventricular wall thickness in diastole in the hypoxic and monocrotaline rat models of pulmonary hypertension and (2) a validation phase to test the performance of the cut-off values in predicting pulmonary hypertension in an independent cohort of rats with Sugen/hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension. Our study demonstrates that right ventricular systolic pressure ≥35.5 mmHg and Fulton's Index ≥0.34 are highly sensitive (>94%) and specific (>91%) cut-offs to distinguish animals with pulmonary hypertension from controls. When pulmonary arterial acceleration time/ejection time and right ventricular wall thickness in diastole were both measured, a result of either pulmonary arterial acceleration time/ejection time ≤0.25 or right ventricular wall thickness in diastole ≥1.03 mm detected right ventricular systolic pressure ≥35.5 mmHg or Fulton's Index ≥0.34 with a sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 100%. With properly validated non-invasive echocardiography measures of right ventricular performance in rats that accurately predict invasive measures of pulmonary hemodynamics, future studies can now utilize these markers to test the efficacy of different treatments with preclinical therapeutic modeling.
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a severe and progressive disease characterized by an
elevation of pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and prolonged exposure of the right
ventricle (RV) to high afterload.[1-3] Over time, this leads to
alteration in RV morphology (hypertrophy and dilation), right heart failure, and
eventually death if left untreated. Animal models of PH have been commonly utilized
to elucidate the pathobiology of this disease with invasive and non-invasive
measures of pulmonary hemodynamics and RV performance, and to explore new
therapeutic approaches.[4] Interestingly, these techniques are widely used in animal models of PH, but
validation and cutoff values of PH have not been established. Therefore, there is a
need for highly sensitive and specific non-invasive echocardiographic markers of PH
that can be applicable across experimental models allowing us to identify and
quantify disease establishment at multiple time-points, as well as monitor the
effect of different management strategies.[5]Characterization of animal models of PH relies on the assessment of hemodynamics by
right heart catheterization (RHC) and histopathology from harvested heart and lung
tissue. Specifically, RV systolic pressure (RVSP) measured by RHC is traditionally
accepted as a surrogate to PAP and serves as the principal diagnostic marker for PH
in rats. Fulton's Index (FI) and RV to body weight ratio (RV/BW) allow for
assessment of RV hypertrophy by comparing the weights of the RV free wall to the
left ventricle (LV) and septal walls and the BW respectively. However, both
approaches are terminal procedures that do not allow for longitudinal monitoring and
are often cost-prohibitive for establishing the long-term efficacy of the tested
interventions. Two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography has the potential to be a
noninvasive modality for diagnostic and longitudinal assessments of RV hemodynamics,
morphology, and function in experimental animal models. Multiple echocardiographic
parameters for assessing RV mechanics have been validated in pediatric and adult
PH,[6-10] but only described in
animals.[11-14] Examples include measures of
RV morphology (end-diastolic RV free wall thickness, RVWTd) and measures of RV
afterload (pressure, resistance, and compliance) and indirect measure of RV
afterload (pulmonary artery acceleration time (PAAT)). While echocardiography has
traditionally been considered to be reliable surrogate for RHC measures and permit
serial investigations, it has not been validated with simultaneous echocardiography
and RHC for accuracy and reliability in characterization of PH in rats.We hypothesized that with a properly designed validation study, echocardiographic
measurements of RV mechanics in rats can provide reliable estimates of RHC-derived
RSVP, FI, and RV/BW. Accordingly, we sought to determine the ability of
echocardiography-derived PAAT and RV wall thickness in diastole (RVWTd) to detect
elevated RV pressures and hypertrophy in rat models of PH to establish diagnostic
echocardiographic thresholds and to validate these diagnostic thresholds in a
separate cohort of PH animals.
Materials and methods
Study design
This study consisted of two parts, a derivation phase and a validation phase. In
the derivation phase, PH was induced by hypoxic exposure for two weeks or by
monocrotaline (MCT) injection (Fig. 1). The rats underwent echocardiography and RHC at the end of
the two weeks following hypoxic exposure or after 28 days of the MCT injection.
Animals were then sacrificed, and histology was performed. Cut-off values for
invasive measures of RV pressure and hypertrophy were determined and
non-invasive echocardiography measures of RV morphology and pulmonary
hemodynamics were compared against the cut-off values to detect PH. In the
validation phase, PH was induced by the combination of Sugen (SU5416) injection
and placement in hypoxia for three weeks, a well characterized rat model of PH.[15] After 24 days, the rats underwent echocardiography, RHC, and were then
sacrificed for histopathology assessment. Echocardiography derived cut-off
values were then determined to accurately predict PH. In both the derivation and
validation phases, a normoxia or vehicle-injected control group received
echocardiography, underwent RHC, and had histology performed along the same time
frames as the three different PH models (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
Schematic of the experimental design.
SU5416: Sugen5416.
Schematic of the experimental design.SU5416: Sugen5416.
Animal care and use
All animal experiments were approved by the Brigham and Women's Hospital and
Children's Hospital Animal Care and Use Committee and the Harvard Medical Area
Standard Committee on Animals.Adult (12-week-old) male Sprague-Dawley rats (250–400 g) (Charles River
Laboratories, Wilmington, MA) were housed in accordance with standard protocols
and animal welfare regulations in the animal facility in 12 h/12 h light/dark
cycle, at 22 ± 1℃ ambient temperature and maintained on ad libitum normal Purina
Rodent Chow (Purina, St. Louis, MO) and tap water.
Animal models of PH
Hypoxic exposure
Rats were exposed to chronic hypoxia at 9% O2 inside a plexiglass
chamber, where O2 is controlled to within a 0.2% range by an
OxyCycler controller (BioSpherix, Redfield, NY). Electronic controllers
injected nitrogen into the hypoxic chamber to maintain the appropriate
FiO2, and ventilation was adjusted to remove CO2
so that it did not exceed 5000 ppm (0.5%). Ammonia was removed by
ventilation and activated charcoal filtration using an electric air
purifier. The hypoxic chamber was opened twice a week to replenish food and
water and to change the bedding. The duration of hypoxic exposure was two
weeks. Control rats were kept in ambient air in the same animal room outside
the hypoxic chamber (Fig.
1).
MCT injection
For the MCT model of PH, age-matched rats were given a single subcutaneous
injection of 60 mg/kg MCT (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) on day 0. Control rats were
injected with the same volume of vehicle (normal saline) and animals were
assessed for development of PH 28 days after injection (Fig. 1).
Sugen/hypoxia model
PH was induced in adult (12-week-old) male Sprague-Dawley rats as previously described.[16] The animals were given a single subcutaneously injection of 20 mg/kg
of Sugen 5416 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) in dimethyl sulfoxide (Sigma, St.
Louis, MO) and placed in hypoxia for three weeks then returned to normoxia
(21% O2). Oxygen was controlled to 9 ± 0.2% by an OxyCycler
controller (BioSpherix, Redfield, NY). Ventilation was adjusted with a fan
and port holes to remove CO2 and ammonia. The endpoint of the
study was 24 days after injection (Fig. 1).
Anesthesia and monitoring
All animals were placed in the supine position for transthoracic echocardiography
and RHC and inhaled isoflurane (1–3%) via nosecone was used for anesthesia.
Isoflurane was adjusted to maintain heart rates >300 beats per minute.
Transthoracic echocardiography
Transthoracic 2D M-mode and Doppler imaging were performed at the Children's
Hospital (derivation phase) and at the Brigham and Women's Hospital
Cardiovascular Hemodynamics Core facility (validation phase) using a
VisualSonics Vevo 2100 or 3100 ultrasound system respectively and a 20 MHz
MicroScan solid-state transducer (Visual Sonics, Toronto, Ontario, Canada). The
rats were anesthetized using isoflurane inhalation (1–3%), titrated to a heart
rate of 300/min, and were spontaneously breathing during the procedure. Rats'
chests were shaved, and fur was removed using depilatory cream.Pulmonary hemodynamics were assessed through images acquired from a modified left
parasternal long-axis view. The pulmonary artery (PA) was visualized using
B-mode echocardiography. We used color Doppler to identify an optimal window for
PA flow measurements at the level where the medial aspect of the proximal aorta
crosses the PA. Subsequently, the pulsed-wave Doppler sample volume was placed
in the center of the color Doppler PA. To interrogate PA flow time intervals,
PAAT was measured from the interval between the onset of systolic ejection and
the peak flow velocity. PA ejection time (ET) was also measured from the
interval between the onset of PA ejection to the point of systolic pulmonary
arterial flow cessation. To account for heart rate variability, PAAT was
adjusted to ET and presented as PAAT/ET. PAAT and ET are non-invasive measure of
RV afterload that provide accurate estimates of invasive PVR, PA pressure, and
PA compliance in children with PH[17] and in hypoxia PH mouse models.[18]RV morphology was assessed with end-diastolic RV free wall thickness (RVWTd) by
M-mode echocardiography via a modified right parasternal long axis imaging
view.[14,19] The ultrasonic beam was placed across the RV wall
perpendicular to the RV long axis at the level of the mitral valve.[20]We assessed RV function using M-mode echocardiography-derived tricuspid annular
plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and measuring the base-to-apex shortening of
the RV during systole in the apical four-chamber view.[20]All measurements were performed off-line by two independent observers in a masked
fashion and values were expressed as the mean of measurements taken during 3–5
individual heartbeats. We developed an echocardiography protocol for image
acquisition and postprocessing data analysis (Appendix 1).
Cardiac catheterization
All invasive hemodynamic measurements were performed within 24 h of
echocardiography using the same anesthetic approach in spontaneously breathing
animals. The rats were anesthetized with 2% isoflurane titrated to a heart rate
of 300/min and as soon as the level of anesthesia was deemed appropriate, a
small transverse incision was made in the abdominal wall, and the transparent
diaphragm was exposed. A 23-gauge butterfly needle with tubing attached to a
pressure transducer was inserted through the diaphragm and into the RV. The
pressure tracing was continuously recorded using PowerLab monitoring hardware
and software (ADInstruments, Colorado Springs, CO). Mean RVSP over the first 10
stable heartbeats was recorded, and animals with heart rates less than 300 beats
per minute were assumed to be over-anesthetized and were excluded from analysis.
All RHC procedures were performed within 24–48 h of echocardiographic
examination.
Cardiac tissue processing
Hearts and pulmonary vasculature were perfused in situ with cold 1 × phosphate
buffered saline injected into the RV. The heart was excised, and both ventricles
were weighed. The RV free wall was then dissected and the remaining LV wall and
intraventricular septum (IVS) were weighed. Right ventricular hypertrophy was
assessed as FI which is the ratio of RV weight to the LV + IVS weight
(RV/LV + IVS) or as the ratio of RV weight to total BW (RV/BW).
Statistical analysis
Cumulative data were analyzed and presented as means ± standard error of the
mean. Data analysis was performed using Prism statistical software (Graphpad
Software, La Jolla, CA) and STATA 12 (StataCorp. 2011. Stata Statistical
Software: Release 12, College Station, TX: StataCorp LP). Multiple group
comparisons were done with analysis of variance and Tukey post-test, comparisons
of two groups were done with t-test. Significance was defined as
p < 0.05. Spearman's correlation and linear regression
were utilized to analyze correlation between two tests performed in the same
animal. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to determine
optimal cutoff values for invasive and noninvasive tests and
areas-under-the-curve (AUC) were calculated. We also determined the intra and
inter-rater reliability for each of the measures using intraclass correlation
(ICC).
Results
Derivation phase
Development of PH and RV remodeling (Hx, MCT)
To investigate the development of PH, RVSP was determined by RHC. Both the
hypoxia group and the MCT group had significantly higher RVSP when compared
to normoxia controls (42.15 ± 1.98 mmHg, n = 13 vs
52.06 ± 3.71 mmHg, n = 8 vs 19.65 ± 0.35 mmHg,
n = 8, respectively p < 0.0001,
Fig. 2a).
Echocardiographic assessment by PAAT/pulmonary artery ejection time (PAET)
of PAP inversely correlated with RVSP by RHC (r = –0.787,
p < 0.0001, Fig. 2b). A two-week hypoxic exposure
or MCT injection led to a significant decrease in PAAT and PAAT/ET when
compared to normoxic controls (18.71 ± 1.06 msec, n = 15,
vs 18.35 ± 1.18 msec, n = 9, vs 23.6 ± 0.90 msec,
n = 16, respectively, p < 0.01,
Fig. 2c), and
(0.227 ± 0.016, n = 15, vs 0.213 ± 0.009,
n = 9, vs 0.339 ± 0.015, n = 16,
respectively, p < 0.01, Fig. 2d). Pulmonary hypertensive
animals from the hypoxia group and MCT groups both showed the characteristic
notched pattern of the pulmonary wave Doppler flow compared to the normoxic
controls (Sup Fig. 1a andb).
Fig. 2.
Derivation phase, development of PH. (a). RVSP measurements for
normoxic, hypoxic, and MCT rats, n = 8–13 per
group. (b) Correlation between PAAT/ET with invasive RVSP
(r = –0.787,
p < 0.0001), n = 30, dashed
lines represent 95% confidence intervals. (c) PAAT for normoxic,
hypoxic, and MCT-treated rats, n = 9–16 per
group. (d) PAAT/ET values for normoxic, hypoxic, and MCT-treated
rats, n = 9–16 per group. Each data point
represents one animal, circles reflect control animals, squares
hypoxic, and triangles MCT animals.
***p < 0.001 compared to normoxic or
vehicle-treated controls, **p < 0.01
compared to normoxic or vehicle-treated controls,
*p < 0.05 between hypoxic and
MCT-treated animals.
Derivation phase, development of PH. (a). RVSP measurements for
normoxic, hypoxic, and MCT rats, n = 8–13 per
group. (b) Correlation between PAAT/ET with invasive RVSP
(r = –0.787,
p < 0.0001), n = 30, dashed
lines represent 95% confidence intervals. (c) PAAT for normoxic,
hypoxic, and MCT-treated rats, n = 9–16 per
group. (d) PAAT/ET values for normoxic, hypoxic, and MCT-treated
rats, n = 9–16 per group. Each data point
represents one animal, circles reflect control animals, squares
hypoxic, and triangles MCT animals.
***p < 0.001 compared to normoxic or
vehicle-treated controls, **p < 0.01
compared to normoxic or vehicle-treated controls,
*p < 0.05 between hypoxic and
MCT-treated animals.RVSP: right ventricular systolic pressure; PAAT/ET: pulmonary
arterial acceleration time/ejection time; Hx: hypoxia; MCT:
monocrotaline.Morphologically, remodeling of the RV in rats exposed to two weeks of hypoxia
and rats that received MCT injection was reflected by significantly
increased FI when compared to the normoxia rats (0.46 ± 0.032,
n = 15, vs 0.48 ± 0.027, n = 9 vs
0.21 ± 0.009, n = 12, p < 0.0001, Fig. 3a). There was a
positive correlation of RVWTd thickness derived by M-mode echocardiography
to FI (r = 0.491, p = 0.01, Fig. 3b). RVWTd was
also significantly increased in hypoxia-exposed rats compared to normoxic
animals (1.189 ± 0.086 mm, n = 15, vs. 0.69 ± 0.021 mm,
n = 16 vs. p < 0.0001, Fig. 3c). Similarly,
RV/BW ratio was increased in both the hypoxia-exposed rats and the
MCT-injected rats (Suppl. Fig. 2a) and correlated with RVWTd
(r = 0.519, p = 0.007, Suppl. Fig.
2b).
Fig. 3.
Derivation phase, correlation of invasive and non-invasive
measures of pulmonary hemodynamics (RVSP), and RVH (FI and
RV/BW). (a) FI in normoxic, hypoxic, and MCT-treated rats,
n = 9–15 per group. (b) Correlation between
RVWTd and FI (r = 0.491,
p = 0.01), n = 25. (c) RVWTd
in normoxic and hypoxic, n = 15–16 per group.
(d) Correlation between FI and RVSP (r = 0.784,
p < 0.0001), n = 30.
(e) Correlation between PAAT/ET with FI
(r = –0.707, p < 0.0001),
n = 36. (f) Correlation between RVWTd and
RVSP (r = 0.536, p = 0.01),
n = 21. Each data point represents one
animal, circles reflect control animals, squares hypoxic, and
triangles MCT animals. ***p < 0.001 compared
to normoxic or vehicle-treated controls. Dashed lines represent
95% confidence intervals (b, d–f).
RV: right ventricle; LV: left ventricle; IVS: intraventricular
septum; RVWTd: right ventricular wall thickness in diastole;
RVSP: right ventricular systolic pressure; PAAT/ET: pulmonary
arterial acceleration time/ejection time.
Derivation phase, correlation of invasive and non-invasive
measures of pulmonary hemodynamics (RVSP), and RVH (FI and
RV/BW). (a) FI in normoxic, hypoxic, and MCT-treated rats,
n = 9–15 per group. (b) Correlation between
RVWTd and FI (r = 0.491,
p = 0.01), n = 25. (c) RVWTd
in normoxic and hypoxic, n = 15–16 per group.
(d) Correlation between FI and RVSP (r = 0.784,
p < 0.0001), n = 30.
(e) Correlation between PAAT/ET with FI
(r = –0.707, p < 0.0001),
n = 36. (f) Correlation between RVWTd and
RVSP (r = 0.536, p = 0.01),
n = 21. Each data point represents one
animal, circles reflect control animals, squares hypoxic, and
triangles MCT animals. ***p < 0.001 compared
to normoxic or vehicle-treated controls. Dashed lines represent
95% confidence intervals (b, d–f).RV: right ventricle; LV: left ventricle; IVS: intraventricular
septum; RVWTd: right ventricular wall thickness in diastole;
RVSP: right ventricular systolic pressure; PAAT/ET: pulmonary
arterial acceleration time/ejection time.Invasive RVSP correlated with measures of RV morphology including FI
(r = 0.784, p < 0.0001, Fig. 3b) and RV/BW
(r = 0.7203, p < 0.0001, data not
shown). Similarly, for non-invasive echocardiographic measures, PAAT/ET
inversely correlated with both FI (r = –0.707,
p < 0.0001, Fig. 3e) and RV/BW ratio
(r = –0.677, p < 0.0001, Suppl.
Fig. 2c). As expected, echocardiographic assessment of RV morphology by
RVWTd was also significantly correlated with RVSP
(r = 0.536, p = 0.01, Fig. 3f).
Establishment of cut-off values of invasive and non-invasive measures
that predict PH
In order to establish the sensitivity and specificity of echocardiographic
measurements for the detection of PH, we first determined the cut-off values
for the gold-standard invasive tests of pulmonary hemodynamics (RVSP) and RV
hypertrophy (FI and RV/BW). ROC curve analysis showed high sensitivity (97%)
and specificity (100%) of RVSP ≥ 35.5 mmHg in distinguishing between
controls and animals with hypoxia or MCT-induced PH (AUC = 0.9947, Fig. 4a). Similarly,
ROC analysis established that FI ≥ 0.34 or RV/BW ≥ 0.81 mg/g were highly
sensitive (94% and 91%, respectively) and specific (97% and 100%,
respectively) as cut-off values to distinguish animals with PH (FI
(AUC = 0.9877) and RV/BW (AUC = 0.9908), Fig. 4b and c, respectively).
Fig. 4.
Invasive and non-invasive measures of pulmonary hemodynamics and
RVH predict PH. (a) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC)
curve of RVSP. Arrow reflects the cutoff value of ≥35.5 mmHg as
distinguishing between normal (normoxic) and pulmonary
hypertensive rats with 97% sensitivity and 100% specificity
(AUC = 0.9947). (b) ROC curve of Fulton's Index showing the
sensitivity and specificity of FI to distinguish between
normoxic and PH rats. The cutoff of ≥0.34 distinguishes PH with
94% sensitivity and 97% specificity (AUC = 0.9877). (c) ROC
curve showing the sensitivity and specificity of RV/BW to
distinguish between normal (normoxic) and PH rats. The cutoff of
≥0.81 mg/g distinguishes pulmonary hypertension with 91%
sensitivity and 100% specificity (AUC = 0.9908). (d) ROC curve
of PAAT/ET measurement accuracy as an indicator of RVSP ≥ 35.5
mmHg. Cutoff value of ≤0.25 predicts PH with 77% sensitivity and
80% specificity (AUC = 0.8667). (e) ROC curve of RVWTd accuracy
in predicting a FI ≥ 0.34. The indicated cutoff value of
RVWTd ≥ 1.03 predicts a FI ≥ 0.34 with 75% sensitivity and 76%
specificity (AUC = 0.7598). (f) Correlation between PAAT/ET and
RVWTd, showing the diagnostic thresholds for PH. Circles reflect
animals without PH (RVSP < 35.5 mmHg and/or FI < 0.34),
squares represent animals with PH (RVSP ≥ 35.5 mmHg and/or
FI ≥ 0.34) (88% sensitivity and 100% specificity when either
PAAT/ET ≤ 0.25 and/or RVWTd ≥ 1.03). Each data point represents
one animal and dashed lines reflect threshold values.
RVSP: right ventricular systolic pressure; ROC: receiver
operating characteristic; FI: Fulton's Index; RV: right
ventricle; RV/BW: right ventricle to body weight ratio; PAAT/ET:
pulmonary arterial acceleration time/ejection time; RVWTd: right
ventricular wall thickness in diastole.
Invasive and non-invasive measures of pulmonary hemodynamics and
RVH predict PH. (a) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC)
curve of RVSP. Arrow reflects the cutoff value of ≥35.5 mmHg as
distinguishing between normal (normoxic) and pulmonary
hypertensive rats with 97% sensitivity and 100% specificity
(AUC = 0.9947). (b) ROC curve of Fulton's Index showing the
sensitivity and specificity of FI to distinguish between
normoxic and PH rats. The cutoff of ≥0.34 distinguishes PH with
94% sensitivity and 97% specificity (AUC = 0.9877). (c) ROC
curve showing the sensitivity and specificity of RV/BW to
distinguish between normal (normoxic) and PH rats. The cutoff of
≥0.81 mg/g distinguishes pulmonary hypertension with 91%
sensitivity and 100% specificity (AUC = 0.9908). (d) ROC curve
of PAAT/ET measurement accuracy as an indicator of RVSP ≥ 35.5
mmHg. Cutoff value of ≤0.25 predicts PH with 77% sensitivity and
80% specificity (AUC = 0.8667). (e) ROC curve of RVWTd accuracy
in predicting a FI ≥ 0.34. The indicated cutoff value of
RVWTd ≥ 1.03 predicts a FI ≥ 0.34 with 75% sensitivity and 76%
specificity (AUC = 0.7598). (f) Correlation between PAAT/ET and
RVWTd, showing the diagnostic thresholds for PH. Circles reflect
animals without PH (RVSP < 35.5 mmHg and/or FI < 0.34),
squares represent animals with PH (RVSP ≥ 35.5 mmHg and/or
FI ≥ 0.34) (88% sensitivity and 100% specificity when either
PAAT/ET ≤ 0.25 and/or RVWTd ≥ 1.03). Each data point represents
one animal and dashed lines reflect threshold values.RVSP: right ventricular systolic pressure; ROC: receiver
operating characteristic; FI: Fulton's Index; RV: right
ventricle; RV/BW: right ventricle to body weight ratio; PAAT/ET:
pulmonary arterial acceleration time/ejection time; RVWTd: right
ventricular wall thickness in diastole.Using the cut-off values for the gold-standard tests established above, we
then sought to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the noninvasive
measures of PAAT, PAAT/ET, and RVWTd in determining whether an animal
developed PH. ROC analysis demonstrated that PAAT ≤ 19 ms was 64% sensitive
and 90% specific as a test to detect an RVSP ≥ the threshold value of
35.5 mmHg (AUC = 0.6885, Suppl. Fig. 2d). A PAAT/ET ratio of ≤ 0.25 detected
an RVSP ≥ 35.5 with sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 80%
(AUC = 0.8667, Fig.
4d). Similarly, ROC analysis determined that RVWTd ≥ 1.03 mm was
75% sensitive and 76% specific for determining that an animal developed a
FI ≥ the cutoff value of 0.34 (AUC = 0.7598, Fig. 4e) and 68% sensitive and 72%
specific for an RV/BW ratio greater than the cutoff value of 0.81 mg/g.
(AUC = 0.7197, Sup Fig.
2e). Measuring both PAAT/ET and RVWTd for each animal improved
sensitivity and specificity for determining PH. When both echocardiographic
measurements were determined, having either a PAAT/ET ≤ 0.25 or a
RVWTd ≥ 1.03 mm detected invasively-determined PH with a specificity of 100%
and a sensitivity of 88% (Fig. 4f).The noninvasive echocardiographic index of RV shortening, TAPSE, was measured
in a sub set of controls and hypoxic rats (Suppl. Fig. 1e and f). As
expected, TAPSE was significantly reduced in the hypoxia group (Suppl. Fig.
3a) compared to controls.
Validation phase
Development of PH and RV remodeling (SUHx)
To independently validate the invasive and non-invasive cut-off values of PH
established in the derivation phase, we tested our measures in the
validation phase with a separate cohort of animals with PH induced by the
combination of Sugen and hypoxia for three weeks (Sugen/hypoxia (SUHx)) as
described above. We compared this cohort to a group of normoxic animals and
sought to define the performance of our measures in predicting PH. As
expected, the SUHx animals developed a significant PH phenotype determined
by significantly higher RVSP when compared to normoxic controls
(50.49 ± 2.71 mmHg, n = 12 vs 22.03 ± 1.15 mmHg,
n = 8, p < 0.0001, Fig. 5a). As expected,
non-invasive assessment of pulmonary hemodynamics by PAAT/ET inversely
correlated with RVSP by RHC (r = −0.686,
p < 0.001, Fig. 5b). Rats in the SUHx group had
significantly lower PAAT and PAAT/ET when compared to normoxic controls
(20.00 ± 0.85 msec, n = 11, vs 26.42 ± 1.25 msec,
n = 12, respectively, p < 0.001,
Fig. 5c) and
(0.232 ± 0.017 vs. 0.374 ± 0.015, n = 11,
n = 12, respectively, p < 0.0001,
respectively, Fig.
5d).
Fig. 5.
Validation phase, development of PH, and RV hypertrophy by SUHx.
(a) RVSP measurements for normoxic and SUHx rats,
n = 6–12 animals per group. (b) Correlation
between PAAT/ET and invasive RVSP (r = –0.686,
p < 0.001), n = 20,
dashed lines represent 95% confidence intervals. (c) PAAT, (d)
PAAT/ET, (e) FI, and (f) RVWTd for normoxic and SUHx rats,
n = 6–12 animals per group. Each data point
represents one animal, circles reflect control animals, and
diamonds SUHx animals. ***p < 0.0001
compared to controls.
RVSP: right ventricular systolic pressure; SUHx: Sugen/hypoxia;
PAAT/ET: pulmonary arterial acceleration time/ejection time; RV:
right ventricle; LV: left ventricle; IVS: intraventricular
septum; RVWTd: right ventricular wall thickness in diastole.
Validation phase, development of PH, and RV hypertrophy by SUHx.
(a) RVSP measurements for normoxic and SUHx rats,
n = 6–12 animals per group. (b) Correlation
between PAAT/ET and invasive RVSP (r = –0.686,
p < 0.001), n = 20,
dashed lines represent 95% confidence intervals. (c) PAAT, (d)
PAAT/ET, (e) FI, and (f) RVWTd for normoxic and SUHx rats,
n = 6–12 animals per group. Each data point
represents one animal, circles reflect control animals, and
diamonds SUHx animals. ***p < 0.0001
compared to controls.RVSP: right ventricular systolic pressure; SUHx: Sugen/hypoxia;
PAAT/ET: pulmonary arterial acceleration time/ejection time; RV:
right ventricle; LV: left ventricle; IVS: intraventricular
septum; RVWTd: right ventricular wall thickness in diastole.We then assessed RV hypertrophy in the SUHx rats and observed a significant
increase in the FI compared to control rats (0.49 ± 0.036,
n = 6, vs 0.24 ± 0.005, n = 7,
p < 0.0001, Fig. 5e). We found a similar
significant difference with and RV/BW (data not shown). Echocardiographic
assessment of RVWTd was also significantly increased compared to control
animals (1.394 ± 0.06 mm, n = 12, vs. 0.62 ± 0.023 mm,
n = 12, p < 0.0001, Fig. 5f).There was a significant inverse correlation between PAAT/ET and FI
(r = –0.754, p < 0.005, Fig. 6a) and RV/BW
ratio (r = –0.809, p < 0.005, Fig. 6b). Similarly,
RVWTd was also significantly correlated with RVSP
(r = 0.806, p < 0.0001, Fig. 6c), FI
(r = 0.854, p < 0.0005, Fig. 6d) and RV/BW
ratio (r = 0.844, p < 0.001, Fig. 6e).
Fig. 6.
Echocardiographic measures of PAAT/ET and RVWTd correlate with
invasive measures of pulmonary hemodynamics (RVSP), and RVH (FI
and RV/BW) in the validation cohort. Correlation between PAAT/ET
with (a) FI (r = –0.7548,
p < 0.005), n = 6–7 per
group; (b) RV/BW (r = −0.809,
p < 0.005), n = 6–7 per
group. Correlation between RVWTd with (c) invasive RVSP
(r = 0.806,
p < 0.0001), n = 8–12 per
group; (d) FI (r = 0.854,
p < 0.0005), n = 6–7 per
group; (e) RV/BW (r = 0.844,
p < 0.001), n = 6–7 per
group. Circles reflect control animals, diamonds SUHx animals,
and dashed lines represent 95% confidence intervals. (f)
Correlation between PAAT/ET and RVWTd, showing the diagnostic
thresholds for PH. Circles reflect animals without PH
(RVSP < 35.5 mmHg and/or FI < 0.34), squares represent
animals with PH (RVSP ≥ 35.5 mmHg and/or FI ≥ 0.34) (97%
sensitivity and 100% specificity when either PAAT/ET ≤ 0.25
and/or RVWTd ≥ 1.03). Each data point represents one animal and
dashed lines reflect threshold values.
PAAT/ET: pulmonary arterial acceleration time/ejection time; RV:
right ventricle; LV: left ventricle; IVS: intraventricular
septum; RV/BW: right ventricle to body weight ratio; RVSP: right
ventricular systolic pressure; RVWTd: right ventricular wall
thickness in diastole.
Echocardiographic measures of PAAT/ET and RVWTd correlate with
invasive measures of pulmonary hemodynamics (RVSP), and RVH (FI
and RV/BW) in the validation cohort. Correlation between PAAT/ET
with (a) FI (r = –0.7548,
p < 0.005), n = 6–7 per
group; (b) RV/BW (r = −0.809,
p < 0.005), n = 6–7 per
group. Correlation between RVWTd with (c) invasive RVSP
(r = 0.806,
p < 0.0001), n = 8–12 per
group; (d) FI (r = 0.854,
p < 0.0005), n = 6–7 per
group; (e) RV/BW (r = 0.844,
p < 0.001), n = 6–7 per
group. Circles reflect control animals, diamonds SUHx animals,
and dashed lines represent 95% confidence intervals. (f)
Correlation between PAAT/ET and RVWTd, showing the diagnostic
thresholds for PH. Circles reflect animals without PH
(RVSP < 35.5 mmHg and/or FI < 0.34), squares represent
animals with PH (RVSP ≥ 35.5 mmHg and/or FI ≥ 0.34) (97%
sensitivity and 100% specificity when either PAAT/ET ≤ 0.25
and/or RVWTd ≥ 1.03). Each data point represents one animal and
dashed lines reflect threshold values.PAAT/ET: pulmonary arterial acceleration time/ejection time; RV:
right ventricle; LV: left ventricle; IVS: intraventricular
septum; RV/BW: right ventricle to body weight ratio; RVSP: right
ventricular systolic pressure; RVWTd: right ventricular wall
thickness in diastole.
Validation of cut-off values established in derivation cohort
In the validation phase, we also generated ROC curves (Suppl. Fig. 4a andb)
and tested the performance of the previously derived echocardiographic
thresholds. A PAAT/ET ratio ≤ 0.25 was 67% sensitive and 100% specific for
determining that an animal had PH. An RVWTd ≥ 1.03 mm was 92% sensitive and
100% specific in identifying animals with PH. When at least one of the
cutoffs for PAAT/ET and RVWTd was satisfied to detect invasive measures of
PH in the SU/Hx model, the sensitivity and specificity increased to 97% and
100% respectively (Fig.
6f). TAPSE was significantly lower in the SUHx model compared to
normoxic controls (Suppl. Fig. 3b).We obtained clear images in all study echocardiograms and the parameters of
PAAT, PAET, RVWTd, and TAPSE were measured. Two independent observers
analyzed the echocardiographic data in both cohorts. Inter-rater reliability
in the derivation phase and both intra- and inter-rater reliability in the
validation phase for all measures are listed in Table 1.
Table 1.
Echocardiographic reproducibility analysis.
Derivation phase
Validation phase
Interobserver
Intraobserver
Interobserver
ICC (95% CI), p-value
ICC (95% CI), p-value
ICC (95% CI), p-value
RVWTd
0.69 (0.45–0.82), <0.01
0.9801(0.95–0.99), <0.001
0.9825 (0.96–0.99), <0.001
PAAT
0.86 (0.74–0.93), <0.01
0.9376 (0.85–0.97), <0.001
0.8682 (0.7–0.94), <0.001
PAET
0.53 (0.24–0.73), 0.003
0.6052 (0.31–0.84), 0.009
0.7853 (0.54–0.91), 0.007
PAAT/ET
0.90 (0.81–0.95), <0.01
0.8965 (0.76–0.96), <0.001
0.8428 (0.65–0.93), <0.001
RVWTd: right ventricular wall thickness in diastole; PAAT:
pulmonary artery acceleration time; PAET: pulmonary artery
ejection time.
Echocardiographic reproducibility analysis.RVWTd: right ventricular wall thickness in diastole; PAAT:
pulmonary artery acceleration time; PAET: pulmonary artery
ejection time.
Discussion
This study presents echocardiography-derived thresholds of PAAT, PAAT/ET, and RVWTd
as reliable measures of pulmonary hemodynamics and RV morphology. We define
quantitative relationships between PAAT/ET and RHC-derived RVSP and RVWTd and FI and
show that (1) PAAT/ET and RVWTd are feasible and reproducible in rat models of PH,
(2) PAAT/ET inversely correlates with RHC-derived RVSP and RVWTd directly correlates
with FI, and (3) a combined PAAT/ET ≤ 0.25 and/or RVWTd ≥1.03 mm reliably detect
elevated pulmonary pressures and RV hypertrophy in three different rat models of
PH.There is no consensus on which rat model of PH most closely mimics the PH observed in
humans. In this study, we employed the three most commonly used rat models to
account for all different types of PH. (1) Hypoxia; (2) MCT-induced PH; and (3)
SUHx; a more severe and progressive PH model.[15] Several different studies have demonstrated in rat models of SUHx and
MCT-induced PH that echocardiography measures of PAAT, TAPSE, and RVWTd matched the
corresponding invasive hemodynamic and heart histopathologic data. However, none of
the previous studies have validated these echocardiography measures against invasive
cut-off values that detect PH in rat models.[20-24]In patients with PH, PAAT and PAAT/ET have been shown to be tricuspid regurgitation
jet velocity (TRJV)-independent, reliable measures of pulmonary
hemodynamics.[6,7,25] In humans with
PH, the TRJV is utilized in clinical practice to estimate PA systolic pressure and
RVSP by the modified Bernoulli equation. However, it has recently been shown that
TRJV is less sensitive to early, small reductions in PA compliance, and minor
increases in PA pressure commonly seen with early evidence of PH and RV dysfunction.[10] In rat models of PH, the quantification of TR is not usually feasible unless
there is severe PH with PA pressures over 65 mmHg.[24,26] Therefore, a validated
non-invasive measure that comprehensively assesses all components of afterload is
needed to assess pulmonary hemodynamics, especially in experimental animal models
that do not allow for characterization with the TRJV. PAAT and PAAT/ET are not meant
to replace RHC as the standard reference method, but they offer an effective tool in
animal models in order to monitor for establishment and progression of PH and
response to therapeutic interventions.Noninvasive assessment of RV wall thickness is challenging because the RV's proximity
to the sternum makes the window for visualization of a consistent segment of RV wall
very narrow. Nevertheless, we were able to consistently locate a segment of RV wall
at the level of the mitral valve that could be measured. In humans, the RV wall
thickness can be measured in a short axis view at the level of papillary muscle in
the LV, but we have found that in rats, the RV and LV can rarely be visualized
together in the same short-axis images. Other investigators have assessed RVWTd and
found association with RV weight and pressure, but the range of RVWT has varied
widely between these reports.[20-24] Our measurements are
consistent with those of Urboniene et al., who used the MCT model and the same
strain of rats as in our study.[22] Although the ICC measurements for RVWT reflect strong inter-rater
reliability, it is not as strong as the ICC for PAAT and PAAT/ET in the derivation
phase. We suspect the difference is likely related to the image clarity and
challenge of finding an M-mode image at the appropriate level and orientation where
the inner and outer aspects of the RV wall are easily distinguished. In the
validation phase, VisualSonics (Vevo 3100 ultrasound system) was utilized to acquire
images. With the newer image acquiring technique, there was improved intra- and
inter-observer reliability across all echocardiographic measures.The findings in this study may have important implications for standardization of
research in experimental animal studies of PH. While the standard approach to assess
development, prevention, or reversal of PH is with a combination of tools that
characterize RV pressure by RHC or echocardiography, RV weight by histopathology,
and RV function by echocardiography,[27] developing non-invasive tools to identify altered pulmonary hemodynamics and
RV performance is needed to comprehensively characterize disease establishment,
progression, and to follow the animals at multiple timepoints beyond the diagnostic
phase. In rats, invasive RHC and histopathologic studies to determine disease are
often terminal, invasive, and require large number of subjects for longitudinal
studies. Coupling this with a paucity of validated and robust non-invasive methods
to characterize the cardio-pulmonary phenotypes in rat models of PH, we feel that
the validated non-invasive indices of pulmonary hemodynamic and RV structural
assessment from this study can be applicable for assessment of RV phenotype across
different rat models of PH.The importance of these results should be interpreted within the framework of the
inherent limitations in this study. PAAT can be affected by heart rate, RV function,
hemodynamic conditions and imaging technique. To address the hemodynamic conditions,
we utilized a standard anesthetic approach with inhalation induction and animal
preparation to ensure that the rats undergo the echocardiograms with similar heart
rates, above 300 bpm. Furthermore, to account for any variability in heart rate,
PAAT was indexed to ET. Although PAAT has also been indexed to cardiac cycle length
to achieve the same normalization,[12] we found an increased sensitivity and specificity for ratio of PAAT/ET to
detect PH with RVSP ≥ 35.5 when compared with that for PAAT alone. In a small cohort
of animals, we also elected to use TAPSE as a measure of RV function which was
decreased across all three rat models of PH, but future work should assess the
relationship between other measures of RV function (e.g. fractional area of change
and deformation imaging) and PAAT measures. There are additional limitations that
may limit generalizability of our findings. All of our studies were performed at sea
level, so the impact of altitude was not evaluated. Our studies were performed in
animals in the 250–400 g weight range by five trained investigators with low intra-
and inter- observer variability, but we recognize that the quality of
echocardiographic images may be affected by the animals' size and expertise of the
investigator.In conclusion, our study demonstrates that echocardiographic measures of RV
performance and pulmonary hemodynamics correlate with RHC-derived pulmonary
hemodynamics and histology and can accurately detect PH in different rat models.
These validated noninvasive indices permit the characterization of the evolution of
PH in rats. With properly validated non-invasive echocardiography measures of RV
performance in rats that precisely detect invasive measures of pulmonary
hemodynamics, future studies can now utilize these markers to test the efficacy of
different management strategies through preclinical therapeutic modeling.Click here for additional data file.Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-pul-10.1177_2045894020910976 for
Echocardiographic markers of pulmonary hemodynamics and right ventricular
hypertrophy in rat models of pulmonary hypertension by Fotios Spyropoulos, Sally
H. Vitali Marlin Touma, Chase D. Rose, Carter R. Petty, Philip Levy, Stella
Kourembanas and Helen Christou in Pulmonary CirculationClick here for additional data file.Supplemental material, sj-pdf-2-pul-10.1177_2045894020910976 for
Echocardiographic markers of pulmonary hemodynamics and right ventricular
hypertrophy in rat models of pulmonary hypertension by Fotios Spyropoulos, Sally
H. Vitali Marlin Touma, Chase D. Rose, Carter R. Petty, Philip Levy, Stella
Kourembanas and Helen Christou in Pulmonary CirculationClick here for additional data file.Supplemental material, sj-jpg-3-pul-10.1177_2045894020910976 for
Echocardiographic markers of pulmonary hemodynamics and right ventricular
hypertrophy in rat models of pulmonary hypertension by Fotios Spyropoulos, Sally
H. Vitali Marlin Touma, Chase D. Rose, Carter R. Petty, Philip Levy, Stella
Kourembanas and Helen Christou in Pulmonary CirculationClick here for additional data file.Supplemental material, sj-jpg-4-pul-10.1177_2045894020910976 for
Echocardiographic markers of pulmonary hemodynamics and right ventricular
hypertrophy in rat models of pulmonary hypertension by Fotios Spyropoulos, Sally
H. Vitali Marlin Touma, Chase D. Rose, Carter R. Petty, Philip Levy, Stella
Kourembanas and Helen Christou in Pulmonary CirculationClick here for additional data file.Supplemental material, sj-jpg-5-pul-10.1177_2045894020910976 for
Echocardiographic markers of pulmonary hemodynamics and right ventricular
hypertrophy in rat models of pulmonary hypertension by Fotios Spyropoulos, Sally
H. Vitali Marlin Touma, Chase D. Rose, Carter R. Petty, Philip Levy, Stella
Kourembanas and Helen Christou in Pulmonary CirculationClick here for additional data file.Supplemental material, sj-jpg-6-pul-10.1177_2045894020910976 for
Echocardiographic markers of pulmonary hemodynamics and right ventricular
hypertrophy in rat models of pulmonary hypertension by Fotios Spyropoulos, Sally
H. Vitali Marlin Touma, Chase D. Rose, Carter R. Petty, Philip Levy, Stella
Kourembanas and Helen Christou in Pulmonary Circulation
Authors: Kibar Yared; Peter Noseworthy; Arthur E Weyman; Elizabeth McCabe; Michael H Picard; Aaron L Baggish Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2011-04-20 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Jose Gomez-Arroyo; Sheinei J Saleem; Shiro Mizuno; Aamer A Syed; Harm J Bogaard; Antonio Abbate; Laimute Taraseviciene-Stewart; Yon Sung; Donatas Kraskauskas; Daniela Farkas; Daniel H Conrad; Mark R Nicolls; Norbert F Voelkel Journal: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol Date: 2012-02-03 Impact factor: 5.464
Authors: Juha W Koskenvuo; Rachel Mirsky; Yan Zhang; Franca S Angeli; Sarah Jahn; Tero-Pekka Alastalo; Nelson B Schiller; Andrew J Boyle; Kanu Chatterjee; Teresa De Marco; Yerem Yeghiazarians Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2010-02-07 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Pierre Bonnet; Sébastien Bonnet; Julien Boissière; Jean-Loïc Le Net; Mathieu Gautier; Eric Dumas de la Roque; Véronique Eder Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Steven H Abman; Georg Hansmann; Stephen L Archer; D Dunbar Ivy; Ian Adatia; Wendy K Chung; Brian D Hanna; Erika B Rosenzweig; J Usha Raj; David Cornfield; Kurt R Stenmark; Robin Steinhorn; Bernard Thébaud; Jeffrey R Fineman; Titus Kuehne; Jeffrey A Feinstein; Mark K Friedberg; Michael Earing; Robyn J Barst; Roberta L Keller; John P Kinsella; Mary Mullen; Robin Deterding; Thomas Kulik; George Mallory; Tilman Humpl; David L Wessel Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-11-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Kurt R Stenmark; Barbara Meyrick; Nazzareno Galie; Wolter J Mooi; Ivan F McMurtry Journal: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol Date: 2009-09-11 Impact factor: 5.464
Authors: Hannes Hudalla; Zoe Michael; Nicolas Christodoulou; Gareth R Willis; Angeles Fernandez-Gonzalez; Evgenia J Filatava; Paul Dieffenbach; Laura E Fredenburgh; Robert S Stearman; Mark W Geraci; Stella Kourembanas; Helen Christou Journal: Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 7.748
Authors: Fotios Spyropoulos; Zoe Michael; Benjamin Finander; Sally Vitali; Kosmas Kosmas; Panagiotis Zymaris; Brian T Kalish; Stella Kourembanas; Helen Christou Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2021-06-17