| Literature DB >> 32537118 |
Xiaoping Chen1,2, Mantang Wang3, Man Li1,2, Jun Sun1,2, Min Lyu1,2, Quanlin Zhong1,2, Dongliang Cheng1,2.
Abstract
A general relationship between theEntities:
Keywords: Nutrient allocation; Wuyi Mountains; limiting nutrient; plant economics spectrum (PES); plant organ; subtropical forest
Year: 2020 PMID: 32537118 PMCID: PMC7281873 DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plaa021
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AoB Plants Impact factor: 3.276
Description of the three communities at different elevations (mean ± standard error). Different letters in a column indicate that significant differences existed between elevations (P < 0. 05). EF, evergreen broad-leaved forest; MF, coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest; DF, deciduous forest; STN, soil total nitrogen content; STP, soil total phosphorus content.
| Vegetation type | Elevation zone | Stand density | Mean DBH | Mean height | STN | STP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (trees/hm2) | (cm) | (m) | (mg/g) | (mg/g) | ||
| EF | Low (1319 m) | 3033. 33 ± 200 | 13. 77 ± 1. 46 | 7. 87 ± 0. 07 | 4. 84 ± 0. 04 | 0. 46 ± 0. 01 |
| MF | Middle (1697 m) | 1133. 33 ± 164. 15 | 21. 39 ± 0. 8 | 10. 56 ± 0. 21 | 5. 25 ± 0. 27 | 0. 38 ± 0. 02 |
| DF | High (1818 m) | 2725 ± 163. 94 | 11. 47 ± 0. 67 | 6. 94 ± 0. 24 | 6. 05 ± 0. 22 | 0. 65 ± 0. 01 |
Figure 1.Comparisons of (A) nitrogen (N) content, (B) phosphorus (P) content and (C) the N:P ratio of leaves, twigs and fine roots in an evergreen broad-leaved forest (EF), a coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest (MF), a deciduous forest (DF) and all elevations (ALL). The distribution of N, P and N:P for different plant organs is characterized by the box plots, where the box length provides the interquartile range, the bottom and the top of the box represent the 25th and 75th percentile, respectively, the horizontal line within the box represents the median value, and the circle within the box represents the mean value. The crosses denote values outside the whisker limit. Different lower- and upper-case letters above the columns indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) between elevations and organs, respectively.
Bivariate relationships between soil nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) content and plant nutrient content along an elevational gradient. * indicates a significant correlation at the 0.05 level (P < 0.05); ** indicates a significant correlation at the 0.01 level (P < 0. 01).
| N (mg g-1) | P (mg g-1) | N:P | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nutrient | leaves | twigs | fine roots | leaves | twigs | fine roots | leaves | twigs | fine roots |
| Nsoils (mg g-1) | 0.80 | 0.89 | -0.28 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.84 | -0.40 | -0.41 | -0.99 |
| Psoils (mg g-1) | 1.00** | 0.99 | 0.34 | 0.96 | 0.55 | 0.99* | 0.22 | 0.21 | -0.75 |
Figure 2.Scaling of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) content (% dry mass) among leaves, twigs and fine roots across all 64 species. (A) N covariance among the leaves, twigs and fine roots (the common slope was α = 1.13, 95 % CI = 1.00–1. 28, P = 0.26). (B) P covariance among the leaves, twigs and fine roots (the common slope was α = 1.03, 95 % CI = 0. 90–1.18, P = 0.48). All lines are significant standardized major axis (SMA) regressions (P < 0. 05); where three lines are present indicating heterogeneity in the intercept, the regression lines for leaves vs. twigs are black, those for leaves vs. fine roots are grey and those for twigs vs. fine roots are dashed.
Summary of nitrogen–phosphorus (N-P) standardized major axis (SMA) regression results within organs and across species among three different plant communities. EF, evergreen broad-leaved forest; MF, coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest; DF, deciduous forest.
| N vs. P | slope | 95 % CIs | constant |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1.20 | 1. 04–1.39 | 1.17 | 0.60 | <0.001 | 75 |
| EF | 1.27 | 1. 01–1.69 | 1.19 | 0.60 | <0.001 | 33 |
| MF | 1.07 | 0. 75–1.52 | 1.16 | 0.48 | <0.001 | 20 |
| DF | 1.42 | 1. 07–1.88 | 1.12 | 0.62 | <0.001 | 22 |
|
| 0.91 | 0. 75–1.12 | 0.88 | 0.23 | <0.001 | 75 |
| EF | 1.13 | 0. 81–1.58 | 0.86 | 0.13 | <0.05 | 33 |
| MF | 0.83 | 0. 54–1.25 | 0.87 | 0.25 | <0.05 | 20 |
| DF | 0.71 | 0. 50–0.99 | 0.92 | 0.45 | <0.001 | 22 |
|
| 1.05 | 0. 90–1.23 | 1.25 | 0.63 | <0.001 | 61 |
| EF | 1.06 | 0. 78–1.45 | 1.25 | 0.69 | <0.001 | 20 |
| MF | 1.08 | 0. 82–1.41 | 1.28 | 0.61 | <0.001 | 19 |
| DF | 1.05 | 0. 80–1.38 | 1.22 | 0.65 | <0.001 | 22 |
Figure 3.Scaling of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) content (% dry mass) in leaves, twigs and fine roots across all 64 species. All lines are significant standardized major axis (SMA) regressions (P < 0.05); where three lines are present indicating heterogeneity in the intercept, the regression lines for leaves are black, those for twigs are grey, and those for fine roots are dashed. The scaling slopes of N and P in the different organs across all species did not differ significantly, with a common slope of 1.08 (95 % CI = 0. 98–1.19, P = 0. 10).
Figure 4.Effect of elevation on the scaling relationship between nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) content (% dry mass) in all 64 species. Lines are significant standardized major axis (SMA) regressions (P < 0. 05). The scaling slopes of N and P in the organs along an elevational gradient did not differ significantly, with a common slope of 0.89 (95 % CI = 0.79–1.00, P = 0.28) and with a common constant of 1.09 (95 % CI = 1.06–1.11, P = 0.84).
Figure 5.Relationships between the nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) content of leaves, twigs, and fine roots and the N:P ratio. All lines are significant regressions (P < 0. 05).