| Literature DB >> 32536956 |
David C LaFon1,2, Steffen Thiel3, Young-Il Kim4, Mark T Dransfield1,2,5, Moon H Nahm1,6.
Abstract
Background: There is increasing recognition of the significance of chronic, low-level inflammation in older adults, or "inflammaging." Innate immune responses and host-bacterial interactions are recognized as key factors in inflammaging. Inflammatory cytokine IL-6, and complement protein C1q have been identified as biomarkers for the development of frailty and aging-related diseases. Older adults are also susceptible to infections with serotypes of Streptococcus pneumoniae that bind ficolin-2, a component of the lectin complement pathway, and low ficolin-2 levels could possibly be involved in such susceptibility.Entities:
Keywords: Aging; Complement system; Elderly; Immune; Inflammation; Lectin
Year: 2020 PMID: 32536956 PMCID: PMC7285792 DOI: 10.1186/s12979-020-00189-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Immun Ageing ISSN: 1742-4933 Impact factor: 6.400
Fig. 1Classical and lectin pathways of complement activation [5]. The classical pathway of complement activation (top left) is initiated by the binding of C1q to antigen-antibody complexes. In contrast, the lectin pathway (top right) is initiated when collectins (including mannose-binding lectin, or MBL) or ficolins, in association with MBL-associated serine proteases (MASPs), bind to targets on cell surfaces. Both pathways, along with the alternative pathway (not shown), ultimately result in formation of C3b, which opsonizes pathogens, and anaphylatoxins C5a and C3a, and results in clearance via phagocytosis (bottom center) or through lysis of membranes via the terminal pathway
Characteristics of study participants
| Young (n = 30) | Old (n = 27) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 32.4 (10.2) | 76.9 (5.3) | – | |
| 16 (53.3) | 12 (44.4) | 0.503* | |
| 12 (40.0) | 20 (74.1) | 0.010* |
*Pearson Chi-Square
Mean levels of inflammatory markers and complement pathway components in young and old adults
| Young* | Old * | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.37 (2.16) | 2.60 (1.91) | 0.671 | |
| 1.59 (1.10) | 2.46 (1.44) | ||
| 1.02 (0.266) | 1.26 (0.42) | ||
| 69.13 (16.25) | 74.10 (15.86) | 0.249 | |
| 722.7 (84.3) | 651.4 (82.1) | ||
| 131.8 (22.3) | 121.1 (26.1) | 0.102 | |
| 27.40 (8.62) | 25.70 (6.92) | 0.420 | |
| 1650 (1251) | 1889 (1541) | 0.520 | |
| 45.37 (39.41) | 53.78 (39.23) | 0.424 | |
| 486.2 (71.8) | 482.8 (80.6) | 0.866 | |
| 12,117 (2838) | 11,539 (3492) | 0.493 | |
| 600.1 (366.2) | 507.6 (171.8) | 0.236 | |
| 7184 (1943) | 7481 (2097) | 0.580 | |
| MAp 44 | 2127 (519) | 2166 (423) | 0.758 |
| MAp 19 | 372.6 (85.2) | 360.1 (96.4) | 0.604 |
| 24,091 (9085) | 27,370 (5889) | 0.116 | |
| 3500 (1195) | 3813 (1056) | 0.304 | |
| 3044 (1403) | 3314 (995) | 0.403 |
*Mean (standard deviation)
Fig. 2IL-6, TNF-α, and C1q levels in young versus older adults. Comparison IL-6, TNF-α, and C1q levels between younger (ages 18–54) and older (age ≥ 70) adults. Asterisks denote statistically significant differences between groups (independent samples t-test), and red bars indicate mean values with 95% confidence intervals
Least squares means comparisons of IL-6, TNF-α and C1q levels between specific combinations of age and race
| Parameter | Groups | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Old | Young | 0.006 | |
| Old/nonwhite | Young/white | 0.014 | |
| Old/white | Young/white | 0.034 | |
| Old | Young | 0.018 | |
| Old/white | Young/white | 0.007 | |
| Old | Young | 0.028 | |
| White | Nonwhite | 0.015 | |
| Old/white | Young/nonwhite | < 0.001 | |
| Young/nonwhite | Young/white | 0.022 | |