Eric S Kim1, Ashley V Whillans2, Matthew T Lee3, Ying Chen4, Tyler J VanderWeele5. 1. Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Lee Kum Sheung Center for Health and Happiness, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Human Flourishing Program, Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Electronic address: eskim@hsph.harvard.edu. 2. Negotiation, Organizations, and Markets Unit, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 3. Human Flourishing Program, Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 4. Human Flourishing Program, Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Human Flourishing Program, Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Growing evidence documents strong associations between volunteering and favorable health and well-being outcomes. However, epidemiological studies have not evaluated whether changes in volunteering are associated with subsequent health and well-being outcomes. METHODS: Data were from 12,998 participants in the Health and Retirement Study-a large, diverse, prospective, and nationally representative cohort of U.S. adults aged >50 years. Using multiple logistic, linear, and generalized linear regression models, this study evaluated if changes in volunteering (between t0, 2006/2008 and t1, 2010/2012) were associated with 34 indicators of physical health, health behaviors, and psychosocial well-being (in t2, 2014/2016). Models adjusted for sociodemographics, physical health, health behaviors, psychosocial factors, and personality, as well as volunteering and all outcomes in the prebaseline wave (t0, 2006/2008). Results accounted for multiple testing and data were analyzed in 2019. RESULTS: During the 4-year follow-up period, participants who volunteered ≥100 hours/year (versus 0 hours/year) had a reduced risk of mortality and physical functioning limitations, higher physical activity, and better psychosocial outcomes (higher: positive affect, optimism, and purpose in life; lower: depressive symptoms, hopelessness, loneliness, and infrequent contact with friends). Volunteering was not associated with other physical health outcomes (diabetes, hypertension, stroke, cancer, heart disease, lung disease, arthritis, overweight/obesity, cognitive impairment, and chronic pain), health behaviors (binge drinking, smoking, and sleep problems), or psychosocial outcomes (life satisfaction, mastery, health/financial mastery, depression, negative affect, perceived constraints, and contact with other family/children). CONCLUSIONS: With further research, volunteering is an activity that physicians might suggest to their willing and able patients as a way of simultaneously enhancing health and society.
INTRODUCTION: Growing evidence documents strong associations between volunteering and favorable health and well-being outcomes. However, epidemiological studies have not evaluated whether changes in volunteering are associated with subsequent health and well-being outcomes. METHODS: Data were from 12,998 participants in the Health and Retirement Study-a large, diverse, prospective, and nationally representative cohort of U.S. adults aged >50 years. Using multiple logistic, linear, and generalized linear regression models, this study evaluated if changes in volunteering (between t0, 2006/2008 and t1, 2010/2012) were associated with 34 indicators of physical health, health behaviors, and psychosocial well-being (in t2, 2014/2016). Models adjusted for sociodemographics, physical health, health behaviors, psychosocial factors, and personality, as well as volunteering and all outcomes in the prebaseline wave (t0, 2006/2008). Results accounted for multiple testing and data were analyzed in 2019. RESULTS: During the 4-year follow-up period, participants who volunteered ≥100 hours/year (versus 0 hours/year) had a reduced risk of mortality and physical functioning limitations, higher physical activity, and better psychosocial outcomes (higher: positive affect, optimism, and purpose in life; lower: depressive symptoms, hopelessness, loneliness, and infrequent contact with friends). Volunteering was not associated with other physical health outcomes (diabetes, hypertension, stroke, cancer, heart disease, lung disease, arthritis, overweight/obesity, cognitive impairment, and chronic pain), health behaviors (binge drinking, smoking, and sleep problems), or psychosocial outcomes (life satisfaction, mastery, health/financial mastery, depression, negative affect, perceived constraints, and contact with other family/children). CONCLUSIONS: With further research, volunteering is an activity that physicians might suggest to their willing and able patients as a way of simultaneously enhancing health and society.
Authors: Rolf H H Groenwold; A Rogier T Donders; Kit C B Roes; Frank E Harrell; Karel G M Moons Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2011-12-23 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Jeanine M Parisi; Julie Kuo; George W Rebok; Qian-Li Xue; Linda P Fried; Tara L Gruenewald; Jin Huang; Teresa E Seeman; David L Roth; Elizabeth K Tanner; Michelle C Carlson Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Andreea Monica Rawlings; Yingying Sang; Albert Richey Sharrett; Josef Coresh; Michael Griswold; Anna Maria Kucharska-Newton; Priya Palta; Lisa Miller Wruck; Alden Lawrence Gross; Jennifer Anne Deal; Melinda Carolyn Power; Karen Jean Bandeen-Roche Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2016-09-12 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Vijay R Varma; Erwin J Tan; Alden L Gross; Greg Harris; William Romani; Linda P Fried; George W Rebok; Michelle C Carlson Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2015-09-02 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Koichiro Shiba; Richard G Cowden; Natasha Gonzalez; Matthew T Lee; Tim Lomas; Alden Yuanhong Lai; Tyler J VanderWeele Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2022-02-14
Authors: Dorota Weziak-Bialowolska; Piotr Bialowolski; Carlued Leon; Tamar Koosed; Eileen McNeely Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-09-25 Impact factor: 3.390