Lauren M Petrick1,2, Manish Arora3,4, Megan M Niedzwiecki3,4. 1. Department of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. lauren.petrick@mssm.edu. 2. Institute for Exposomic Research, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. lauren.petrick@mssm.edu. 3. Department of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. 4. Institute for Exposomic Research, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The advent of low-volume biosampling and novel biomarker matrices offers non- or minimally invasive approaches to sampling in children. These new technologies, combined with advancements in mass spectrometry that provide high sensitivity, robust measurements of low-concentration exposures, facilitate the application of untargeted metabolomics in children's exposome research. Here, we review emerging sampling technologies for alternative biomatrices-dried capillary blood, interstitial fluid, saliva, teeth, and hair-and highlight recent applications of these samplers to drive discovery in population-based exposure research. RECENT FINDINGS: Biosampling and biomarker technologies demonstrate potential to directly measure exposures during key developmental time periods. While saliva is the most traditional of the reported biomatrices, each technology has key advantages and disadvantages. For example, hair and teeth provide retrospective analysis of past exposures, and dried capillary blood provides quantitative measurements of systemic exposures that can be more readily compared with traditional venous blood measurements. Importantly, all technologies can or have the potential to be used at home, increasing the convenience and parental support for children's biosampling. This review describes emerging sample collection technologies that hold promise for children's exposome studies. While applications in metabolomics are still limited, these novel matrices are poised to facilitate longitudinal exposome studies to discover key exposures and windows of susceptibility affecting children's health.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The advent of low-volume biosampling and novel biomarker matrices offers non- or minimally invasive approaches to sampling in children. These new technologies, combined with advancements in mass spectrometry that provide high sensitivity, robust measurements of low-concentration exposures, facilitate the application of untargeted metabolomics in children's exposome research. Here, we review emerging sampling technologies for alternative biomatrices-dried capillary blood, interstitial fluid, saliva, teeth, and hair-and highlight recent applications of these samplers to drive discovery in population-based exposure research. RECENT FINDINGS: Biosampling and biomarker technologies demonstrate potential to directly measure exposures during key developmental time periods. While saliva is the most traditional of the reported biomatrices, each technology has key advantages and disadvantages. For example, hair and teeth provide retrospective analysis of past exposures, and dried capillary blood provides quantitative measurements of systemic exposures that can be more readily compared with traditional venous blood measurements. Importantly, all technologies can or have the potential to be used at home, increasing the convenience and parental support for children's biosampling. This review describes emerging sample collection technologies that hold promise for children's exposome studies. While applications in metabolomics are still limited, these novel matrices are poised to facilitate longitudinal exposome studies to discover key exposures and windows of susceptibility affecting children's health.
Authors: Antonio F Hernández; David Lozano-Paniagua; Beatriz González-Alzaga; Matthaios P Kavvalakis; Manolis N Tzatzarakis; Inmaculada López-Flores; Clemente Aguilar-Garduño; Rafael A Caparros-Gonzalez; Aristidis M Tsatsakis; Marina Lacasaña Journal: Environ Int Date: 2019-07-27 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Chandresh Nanji Ladva; Rachel Golan; Roby Greenwald; Tianwei Yu; Stefanie Ebelt Sarnat; W Dana Flanders; Karan Uppal; Douglas I Walker; ViLinh Tran; Donghai Liang; Dean P Jones; Jeremy A Sarnat Journal: J Breath Res Date: 2017-12-06 Impact factor: 3.262
Authors: Kirsten Heussner; Manfred Rauh; Nada Cordasic; Carlos Menendez-Castro; Hanna Huebner; Matthias Ruebner; Marius Schmidt; Andrea Hartner; Wolfgang Rascher; Fabian B Fahlbusch Journal: Steroids Date: 2017-02-09 Impact factor: 2.668
Authors: Manish Arora; Asa Bradman; Christine Austin; Michelle Vedar; Nina Holland; Brenda Eskenazi; Donald R Smith Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2012-04-11 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Amy E Margolis; Ran Liu; Vasco A Conceição; Bruce Ramphal; David Pagliaccio; Mariah L DeSerisy; Emily Koe; Ena Selmanovic; Amarelis Raudales; Nur Emanet; Aurabelle E Quinn; Beatrice Beebe; Brandon L Pearson; Julie B Herbstman; Virginia A Rauh; William P Fifer; Nathan A Fox; Frances A Champagne Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2022-03-31 Impact factor: 9.052