Marlieke F Dietz1, Edgard A Prihadi2, Pieter van der Bijl1, Nina Ajmone Marsan1, Victoria Delgado1, Jeroen J Bax3. 1. Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. 2. Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Cardiology, ZNA Middelheim Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium. 3. Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. Electronic address: j.j.bax@lumc.nl.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of staging right heart failure (RHF) in patients with significant secondary tricuspid regurgitation (TR). BACKGROUND: Right ventricular dysfunction (RVD), defined as tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion <17 mm and clinical signs of RHF, defined as New York Heart Association functional class ≥II, peripheral edema, or use of diuretics, do not always coincide in patients with significant secondary TR and may have different prognostic implications. METHODS: A total of 1,311 patients with significant secondary TR (median age: 71 [interquartile range: 62 to 78] years; 50% male) were divided into 4 RHF Stages according to the presence or absence of RVD and clinical signs of RHF: Stage 1 was defined as no RVD and no signs of RHF; Stage 2 indicated RVD but no signs of RHF; Stage 3 included RVD and signs of RHF; Stage 4 was defined as RVD and refractory signs of RHF at rest. Five-year mortality rates were compared across the 4 Stages of RHF, and the independent associates of mortality were identified by using multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: A total of 101 patients (8%) were classified as Stage 1, 124 (10%) as Stage 2, 683 (52%) as Stage 3, and 403 (31%) as Stage 4. Patients in higher Stages of RHF had more comorbidities and worse renal and left ventricular systolic function. Cumulative 5-year survival was 54%. RHF Stages 3 and 4 were independently associated with increased mortality compared to Stage 1 (hazard ratio: 2.110 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.163 to 3.828] and 3.318 [95% CI: 1.795 to 6.133], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with significant secondary TR, higher Stages of RHF are independently associated with all-cause mortality at long-term follow-up.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of staging right heart failure (RHF) in patients with significant secondary tricuspid regurgitation (TR). BACKGROUND: Right ventricular dysfunction (RVD), defined as tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion <17 mm and clinical signs of RHF, defined as New York Heart Association functional class ≥II, peripheral edema, or use of diuretics, do not always coincide in patients with significant secondary TR and may have different prognostic implications. METHODS: A total of 1,311 patients with significant secondary TR (median age: 71 [interquartile range: 62 to 78] years; 50% male) were divided into 4 RHF Stages according to the presence or absence of RVD and clinical signs of RHF: Stage 1 was defined as no RVD and no signs of RHF; Stage 2 indicated RVD but no signs of RHF; Stage 3 included RVD and signs of RHF; Stage 4 was defined as RVD and refractory signs of RHF at rest. Five-year mortality rates were compared across the 4 Stages of RHF, and the independent associates of mortality were identified by using multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: A total of 101 patients (8%) were classified as Stage 1, 124 (10%) as Stage 2, 683 (52%) as Stage 3, and 403 (31%) as Stage 4. Patients in higher Stages of RHF had more comorbidities and worse renal and left ventricular systolic function. Cumulative 5-year survival was 54%. RHF Stages 3 and 4 were independently associated with increased mortality compared to Stage 1 (hazard ratio: 2.110 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.163 to 3.828] and 3.318 [95% CI: 1.795 to 6.133], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with significant secondary TR, higher Stages of RHF are independently associated with all-cause mortality at long-term follow-up.
Authors: Dorota Nowosielecka; Wojciech Jacheć; Anna Polewczyk; Andrzej Kleinrok; Łukasz Tułecki; Andrzej Kutarski Journal: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther Date: 2021-04