| Literature DB >> 32534962 |
Josepheen De Asis-Cruz1, Kushal Kapse1, Sudeepta K Basu2, Mariam Said2, Dustin Scheinost3, Jonathan Murnick1, Taeun Chang4, Adre du Plessis5, Catherine Limperopoulos6.
Abstract
Brain structural changes in premature infants appear before term age. Functional differences between premature infants and healthy fetuses during this period have yet to be explored. Here, we examined brain connectivity using resting state functional MRI in 25 very premature infants (VPT; gestational age at birth <32 weeks) and 25 healthy fetuses with structurally normal brain MRIs. Resting state data were evaluated using seed-based correlation analysis and network-based statistics using 23 regions of interest (ROIs) per hemisphere. Functional connectivity strength, the Pearson correlation between blood oxygenation level dependent signals over time across all ROIs, was compared between groups. In both cohorts, connectivity between homotopic ROIs showed a decreasing medial to lateral gradient. The cingulate cortex, medial temporal lobe and the basal ganglia shared the strongest connections. In premature infants, connections involving superior temporal, hippocampal, and occipital areas, among others, were stronger compared to fetuses. Premature infants showed stronger connectivity in sensory input and stress-related areas suggesting that extra-uterine environment exposure alters the development of select neural networks in the absence of structural brain injury.Entities:
Keywords: Functional connectivity; In utero versus ex utero brain function; Premature birth; Resting state MRI
Year: 2020 PMID: 32534962 PMCID: PMC7493786 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117043
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage ISSN: 1053-8119 Impact factor: 6.556
Fig. 1.Functional connectivity in fetuses and premature infants.
46 regions of interest (ROIs) are shown in (A). (B) shows whole brain connectivity in fetuses (left) and premature infants (right). Note greater number of significant and cross-hemispheric connections (red lines) in the latter; black lines – ipsilateral connections; darker lines indicate greater connectivity strength. Outermost circle shows 46 ROIs, middle green circle shows nodal degree (number of other regions connected to an ROI, darker hues indicate higher degree), innermost blue circle shows nodal betweenness (number of connections that pass through an ROI, again, darker colors mean higher betweenness). Cross-hemispheric connectivity between homologous ROI pairs shown in (C). Connections between 20/23 R-L ROI pairs significant in premature infants (red bars), marked by white asterisks; eight pairs were significant in fetuses (white asterisks); bilateral connections that were part of subnetwork with greater connectivity in premature infants marked by black asterisks at the bottom of the bars. White asterisks (*) = adjusted p<0.05; error bars indicate standard error of the mean. Regions of interest: FRO, frontal; PAR, parietal; OCC, occipital; HIP, hippocampus; AMY, amygdala; ATLmed, anterior temporal lobe, medial part; ATLlat, anterior temporal lobe, lateral part; PHGant, gyri parahippocampalis et ambiens anterior part; PHGpost, gyri parahippocampalis et ambiens posterior part; STGmid, superior temporal gyrus, middle part; STp, superior temporal gyrus, posterior part; MITant, medial and inferior temporal gyri anterior part; MITpost, medial and inferior temporal gyri posterior part, FUSant, lateral occipitotemporal gyrus, gyrus fusiformis anterior part; FUSpost, lateral occipitotemporal gyrus, gyrus fusiformis posterior; INS, insula; CGant, cingulate gyrus, anterior part; CGpost, cingulate gyrus, posterior part; CAU, caudate; THA, thalamus; STN, subthalamic nucleus; LEN, lentiform nucleus; and, CRB, cerebellum.
Clinical characteristics of preterm infants and fetuses.
| Clinical Characteristics | [ | [ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| n = 25 | n = 25 | ||
| GA/PMA at MRI, wk | 30.78 ± 2.14 | 30.77 ± 2.52 | 0.90 |
| 26.14–33.57 | 26.71–34.29 | ||
| Day of life at MRI | 16.84 ± 9.36 | – | – |
| Female | 16 (64) | 12 (48) | |
| GA at birth, wk | 28.37 ± 1.91 | 39.02 ± 1.06 | |
| 24.29–32.14 | 37–40.71 | ||
| Birth weight, g | 1155.88 ± 307.43 | 3415.78 ± 476.32 | |
| 640–1995 | 2268–4265 | ||
| Small for GA | 0 (0) | 1 (4) | 0.49 |
| Vaginal delivery | 8 (32) | 13(59) | 0.08 |
| APGAR score at 5 min, median (range) | 8 (2–9) | 9 (6–9) | |
| Highest level of ventilatory support | |||
| High frequency ventilation | 1 (4) | ||
| Conventional ventilation | 17 (68) | ||
| NIPPV, Vapotherm or CPAP | 5 (20) | ||
| Minimum pH | 7.32 ± 0.05 | ||
| Maximum pCO2, mmHg | 45.84 ± 17.58 | ||
| Length of mechanical ventilation, d | 14.88 ± 17.58 | ||
| 1–77 | |||
| Pressor support | 3 (12) | ||
| PDA | 5 (20) | ||
| PDA requiring ligation | 1 (4) | ||
| NEC | 10 (40) | ||
| NEC requiring surgery | 2 (8) | ||
| BPD | 6 (24) | ||
| Clinical infection | 1 (4) |
Significance:
< 0.05,
< 0.01,
< 0.001;
data presented as mean ± SD (range) or n (% of n), unless specified otherwise. Gender, mode of delivery and SGA compared using Fisher’s exact test; the rest compared using Mann-Whitney U Test.;
APGAR score, minimum pH and maximum PCO2 data from 24 premature infants, minimum PO2 from 19 premature infants;
Birth weight data from 23 fetuses, GA from 24, mode of delivery from 22, APGAR from 20; NIPPV – nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation; CPAP – continuous positive airway pressure, PDA – patent ductus arteriosus, NEC – necrotizing enterocolitis, BPD – bronchopulmonary dysplasia.
Duration of resting state scans (in minutes).
| | Fetus | Premature infants | | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||
| Scan duration | 7 | 0 | 8.27 | 1.70 | |
| Retained after preprocessing (min, %) | 5.41 (77.29) | 0.64 (9.15) | 7.50 (91.06) | 1.82 (11.79) | |
| Minimum scan length | 4.40 | – | 4.13 | – | |
| Maximum scan length | 6.85 | – | 9.87 | – | – |
| Retained for analysis (min, %) | 5.31 (75.89) | 0.64 (8.62) | 5.31 (67.08) | 0.63 (16.23) | 0.70 |
Significance:
< 0.05,
< 0.01,
< 0.001.
Summary of frame-by-frame motion in healthy fetuses and premature infants.
| Metric | Fetus | Premature infants | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
| Max excursion | 0.49 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.09 |
| Max excursion | 0.53 | 0.19 | 0.25 | 0.12 |
| Max excursion | 0.69 | 0.16 | 0.41 | 0.22 |
| Max excursion pitch (°) | 0.97 | 0.30 | 0.93 | 0.44 |
| Max excursion yaw (°) | 0.99 | 0.31 | 0.53 | 0.34 |
| Max excursion roll (°) | 1.01 | 0.24 | 0.67 | 0.50 |
| Mean excursion | 0.11 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Mean excursion | 0.12 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| Mean excursion | 0.17 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| Mean excursion pitch (°) | 0.20 | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.02 |
| Mean excursion yaw (°) | 0.20 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.04 |
| Mean excursion roll (°) | 0.20 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.06 |
| RMSrel
| 0.14 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| RMSrel
| 0.17 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.03 |
| RMSrel
| 0.23 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.05 |
| RMSrel pitch (°) | 0.27 | 0.08 | 0.20 | 0.11 |
| RMSrel yaw (°) | 0.27 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.06 |
| RMSrel
| 0.28 | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.10 |
| Max FD (mm) | 1.32 | 0.17 | 0.74 | 0.34 |
| Ave FD (mm) | 0.48 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.08 |
Motion parameters are different between groups (p < 0.01) except for max excursion pitch (°).
Top 20 significantly connected ROI pairs in fetuses and premature infants.
| | Fetus | | Premature infant | | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROI 1 | ROI 1 | ROI 1 | ROI 1 | |||
| 1 | CGant-R | CGant-L | 0.75 | CGant-R | CGant-L | 0.77 |
| 2 | PHGant-L | FUSant-L | 0.74 | CGpost-R | CGpost-L | 0.76 |
| 3 | PHGant-R | FUSant-R | 0.69 | THA-R | THA-L | 0.75 |
| 4 | CGpost-R | CGpost-L | 0.67 | CAU-L | LEN-L | 0.75 |
| 5 | MITant-L | FUSant-L | 0.66 | CRB-L | CRB-R | 0.75 |
| 6 | ATLmed-L | PHGant-L | 0.65 | HIP-L | PHGant-L | 0.70 |
| 7 | AMY-R | ATLmed-R | 0.63 | OCC-R | OCC-L | 0.70 |
| 8 | ATLmed-R | ATLlat-R | 0.62 | CAU-R | LEN-R | 0.69 |
| 9 | CAU-R | LEN-R | 0.61 | HIP-R | PHGant-R | 0.68 |
| 10 | MITant-R | FUSant-R | 0.61 | ATLmed-L | ATLlat-L | 0.65 |
| 11 | CAU-L | LEN-L | 0.60 | PAR-R | PAR-L | 0.65 |
| 12 | CRB-L | CRB-R | 0.59 | AMY-L | PHGant-L | 0.64 |
| 13 | FRO-R | FRO-L | 0.59 | FRO-R | FRO-L | 0.63 |
| 14 | MITant-L | MITpost-L | 0.58 | AMY-R | PHGant-R | 0.62 |
| 15 | CAU-R | THA-R | 0.58 | STN-L | LEN-L | 0.62 |
| 16 | PHGpost-L | FUSpost-L | 0.57 | STN-R | STN-L | 0.61 |
| 17 | THA-R | LEN-R | 0.57 | STm-R | INS-R | 0.61 |
| 18 | STGmid-R | STGpost-R | 0.56 | THA-L | LEN-L | 0.61 |
| 19 | CAU-L | THA-L | 0.56 | HIP-L | AMY-L | 0.61 |
| 20 | ATLmed-L | ATLlat-L | 0.56 | STGmid-R | STGpost-R | 0.60 |
Fig. 2.Averaged connectivity maps in representative ROIs: left hippocampus (top), left cerebellum (middle), and right anterior cingulate (bottom). Images are t statistical maps overlaid on high-resolution cohort-specific templates. Maps thresholded at p < 0.001 followed by AFNI’s ClustSim; red to yellow indicate low to high t values.
Fig. 3.Subnetwork with increased connectivity in premature infants compared to fetuses.
(A) shows ipsilateral (gray) and cross-hemispheric (red) connections that were different between groups. Force-directed graph (B) shows full subnetwork; line thickness reflect strength of differences; size of circle indicate number of other regions linked to an ROI; and, colors specify anatomical groupings based on Makropoulos (Makropoulos et al., 2014).
Fig. 4.Medial to lateral connectivity gradient.
Medial structures share stronger connections than lateral ones.