| Literature DB >> 32532550 |
Ru Ouyang1, Xinrui Li2, Rui Wang2, Qiqi Zhou1, Yali Sun2, Enjun Lei3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To observe the effects of preoperative right stellate ganglion block on perioperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing lung lobectomy.Entities:
Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Autonomic function; Bloqueio do gânglio estrelado; Fibrilação atrial; Função autonômica; Lobectomia; Lobectomy; Stellate ganglion block
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32532550 PMCID: PMC9373709 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjan.2020.03.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Anesthesiol ISSN: 0104-0014
Figure 1Study Flowchart.
Figure 2Note: TG, Thyroid Gland; CA, Carotid Artery; IJ, Internal Jugular vein; AS, Anterior Scalene; LCM, Longus Collis Muscle.
Comparison of preoperative and operative clinical factors between the two groups.
| Characteristic | S Group (n = 100) | C Group (n = 100) |
|---|---|---|
| Sex | ||
| Male | 61 | 58 |
| Female | 39 | 42 |
| Age (Y) | 64.78 ± 5.744 | 66.04 ± 6.334 |
| Tumor location | ||
| Right | 59 | 61 |
| Upper | 28 | 30 |
| Middle | 10 | 8 |
| Lower | 21 | 23 |
| Left | 41 | 39 |
| Upper | 30 | 31 |
| Lower | 11 | 8 |
| FEV1 (%) | 76.57 ± 3.245 | 76.62 ± 3.362 |
| Hypertension | ||
| Yes | 48 | 51 |
| No | 52 | 49 |
| Diabetes | ||
| Yes | 32 | 29 |
| No | 68 | 71 |
| Urinary volume (mL) | 326.90 ± 89.924 | 331.55 ± 97.513 |
| Blood loss (mL) | 129.40 ± 65.440 | 137.64 ± 56.293 |
| Infusion volume (mL) | ||
| Liquid | 1231.98 ± 147.619 | 1257.67 ± 195.688 |
| Colloid | 525.41 ± 80.767 | 515.59 ± 75.978 |
Comparison of POAF and other types of arrhythmias between the two groups.
| Type | S Group n = 100 | C Group n = 100 | χ2 | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atrial fibrillation | 3/100 (3%) | 10/100 (10%) | 4.031 | 0.045 |
| Other atrial arrhythmia | 20/100 (20%) | 38/100 (38%) | 7.868 | 0.005 |
| Ventricular arrhythmia | 28/100 (28%) | 39/100 (39%) | 1.792 | 0.09 |
Note: Qualitative data were expressed as numbers or percentages, and the comparison between the two groups used Chi-Square tests and Fisher probabilities.
Figure 3Note: The data’s followed a normal distribution, and the comparison between the two groups used the parametric test.