John J G Pritchard1, Graham Hamilton2, Carolyn D Hurst3, Sioban Fraser4, Clare Orange5, Margaret A Knowles3, Robert J Jones6, Hing Y Leung7, Tomoko Iwata8. 1. School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom. 2. Glasgow Polyomics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom. 3. Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom. 4. Department of Pathology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom. 5. Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom. 6. Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom. 7. Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, United Kingdom. 8. School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Tomoko.Iwata@glasgow.ac.uk.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Real-time monitoring of disease status would be beneficial for timely decision making in the treatment of urothelial cancer (UC), and may accelerate the evaluation of clinical trials. Use of cell free tumor DNA (cftDNA) as a biomarker in liquid biopsy is minimally invasive and its successful use has been reported in various cancer types, including UC. The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of digital droplet PCR (ddPCR)-based assays to monitor UC after treatment. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Blood, urine and matching formalin fixed, paraffin embedded diagnostic specimens were collected from 20 patients diagnosed with stage T1 (n = 2) and T2/T3 (n = 18) disease. SNaPshot assays, Sanger sequencing and whole exome sequencing were used to identify tumor-specific mutations, and somatic mutation status was confirmed using patient-matched DNAs extracted from buffy coats and peripheral blood mononucleocytes. The ddPCR assays of the tumor-specific mutations were used to detect the fractional abundance of cftDNA in plasma and urine. RESULTS: SNaPshot and Sanger sequencing identified point mutations in 70% of the patients that were assayable by ddPCR. Cases of remission and relapse monitored by assays for PIK3CA E542K and TP53 Y163C mutations in plasma and urine concurred with clinical observations up to 48 months from the start of chemotherapy. A new ddPCR assay for the telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter (-124) mutation was developed. The TERT assay was able to detect mutations in cases below the limit of detection by SNaPshot. Whole exome sequencing identified a novel mutation, CNTNAP4 G727*. A ddPCR assay designed to detect this mutation was able to distinguish mutant from wild-type alleles. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated that ddPCR assays could be used to detect cftDNA in liquid biopsy monitoring of the post-therapy disease status in patients with UC. Overall, 70% of the patients in our study harbored mutations that were assayable by ddPCR.
OBJECTIVES: Real-time monitoring of disease status would be beneficial for timely decision making in the treatment of urothelial cancer (UC), and may accelerate the evaluation of clinical trials. Use of cell free tumor DNA (cftDNA) as a biomarker in liquid biopsy is minimally invasive and its successful use has been reported in various cancer types, including UC. The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of digital droplet PCR (ddPCR)-based assays to monitor UC after treatment. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Blood, urine and matching formalin fixed, paraffin embedded diagnostic specimens were collected from 20 patients diagnosed with stage T1 (n = 2) and T2/T3 (n = 18) disease. SNaPshot assays, Sanger sequencing and whole exome sequencing were used to identify tumor-specific mutations, and somatic mutation status was confirmed using patient-matched DNAs extracted from buffy coats and peripheral blood mononucleocytes. The ddPCR assays of the tumor-specific mutations were used to detect the fractional abundance of cftDNA in plasma and urine. RESULTS: SNaPshot and Sanger sequencing identified point mutations in 70% of the patients that were assayable by ddPCR. Cases of remission and relapse monitored by assays for PIK3CA E542K and TP53 Y163C mutations in plasma and urine concurred with clinical observations up to 48 months from the start of chemotherapy. A new ddPCR assay for the telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter (-124) mutation was developed. The TERT assay was able to detect mutations in cases below the limit of detection by SNaPshot. Whole exome sequencing identified a novel mutation, CNTNAP4 G727*. A ddPCR assay designed to detect this mutation was able to distinguish mutant from wild-type alleles. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated that ddPCR assays could be used to detect cftDNA in liquid biopsy monitoring of the post-therapy disease status in patients with UC. Overall, 70% of the patients in our study harbored mutations that were assayable by ddPCR.